Skip to main content

Windows EAPHost Service CVE-2026-84016

| EUVDEUVD-2026-99453 HIGH
Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-7hqq-5qcm-whvw
7.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged local session
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted input to EAPHost Service
  3. Exploit
    Trigger out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)
  4. Execution
    Corrupt memory to hijack execution
  5. Impact
    Elevate to SYSTEM privileges

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, write limits
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already hold an authenticated low-privilege local session on the target Windows host (PR:L), and to be able to execute code locally that interacts with the EAPHost Service (the Extensible Authentication Protocol host service used for 802.1X / network authentication). No user interaction is needed (UI:N) and attack complexity is low (AC:L), but the strict AV:L constraint means it cannot be triggered remotely over the network - it is a post-foothold escalation. The primary limiting factors are the need for prior local access and valid (even if unprivileged) credentials; there is no indication a special non-default configuration is required, as EAPHost is a standard Windows component.

Impact

This is a credible, patch-now-class local privilege escalation but not a drop-everything emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N) is internally consistent with the description: an already-authorized local user triggers an out-of-bounds write (CWE-787) in the Windows EAPHost Service to gain full C:H/I:H/A:H impact - effectively SYSTEM-level control. The CVSS vector and description agree (both indicate local, authenticated exploitation), so there is no signal conflict here. CISA's SSVC framework reinforces a measured priority: Exploitation=none (no observed or public exploitation), Automatable=no (consistent with a local EoP requiring an existing foothold, not mass-scannable), but Technical Impact=total (matching the C/I/A:H impact). No EPSS score was provided in the input, and there is no CISA KEV listing and no POC indicator - so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Net: this is a legitimately serious memory-corruption EoP (total technical impact) that an attacker would chain AFTER initial access, but the absence of exploitation evidence and the non-automatable, local-only nature make it a high-priority patch rather than an actively-exploited crisis.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already has a low-privileged authenticated session on a Windows host (via phishing, stolen credentials, or a prior exploit) runs a crafted local program that sends malformed input to the EAPHost Service, triggering an out-of-bounds write that corrupts memory and elevates them to SYSTEM. No user interaction is required and attack complexity is low (AC:L), but exploitation is strictly local and requires an existing foothold. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Local privilege escalation in the Windows EAPHost Service (the Extensible Authentication Protocol host component) allows an attacker who already holds an authenticated, low-privilege local session to trigger an out-of-bounds write and elevate to SYSTEM. The flaw is rated CVSS 7.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), so exploitation is a post-foothold step requiring local code execution and valid credentials, not remote network access; no user interaction is needed and complexity is low. Microsoft has released fixes covering Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server 2012 through 2025, and at time of analysis no public exploit code has been identified and CISA SSVC records exploitation as none, making this a credible patch-now item rather than an emergency.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor-released Microsoft security update for the applicable Windows build; per the EUVD version ranges, patched builds include Windows 10 1607/Server 2016 at 10.0.14393.9612, Windows 10 1809/Server 2019 at 10.0.17763.9376, Windows 10 21H2/22H2 at 10.0.19044.7807, Windows 11 23H2 at 10.0.22631.7652, Windows 11 24H2 and Windows Server 2025 at 10.0.26100.9711 and 10.0.26100.33650 respectively, Windows 11 25H2 at 10.0.26200.9711, Windows 11 26H1 at 10.0.28000.3231, Windows 11 26H2 at 10.0.26300.9711, Windows Server 2022 at 10.0.20348.5761, Windows Server 2012 at 6.2.9200.26434, and Windows Server 2012 R2 at 6.3.9600.23470; confirm the exact KB and ordering in the MSRC advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-84016 (mirrored at https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-84016) before rollout. Because EAPHost is a standard component whose RPC surface cannot simply be turned off without breaking 802.1X wired/wireless authentication and EAP-based VPN (IKEv2) connectivity, the practical compensating controls are access-oriented rather than configuration-oriented until patching completes: enforce least privilege so that unprivileged interactive/RDP sessions are limited to users who genuinely need local logon (side effect: restricts legitimate local/remote interactive use), use WDAC/AppLocker to block untrusted local binaries that could call into the service (side effect: application compatibility and maintenance overhead), and monitor Windows event logs and crash dumps for EapHost/eapsvc faults or unexpected SYSTEM-level process lineage originating from low-privilege sessions (side effect: detection-only, no prevention). Disabling the service or blocking its RPC endpoint outright is not recommended as a workaround because it degrades network authentication for affected hosts. There is no vendor-released patch version beyond the builds above, and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, so prioritization should focus on hosts where low-privilege local or RDP access is broadly granted.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

EAPHost (the Extensible Authentication Protocol Host service, implemented in the Windows EapHost/eapsvc architecture) is the broker that loads and manages EAP method DLLs used for 802.1X wired/wireless authentication, VPN (IKEv2/PPTP with EAP), and Network Access Protection scenarios. Because it runs with high privileges and exposes an RPC/inter-process interface that local callers can reach, defects inside it are a classic local privilege-escalation surface. The root cause here is CWE-787 (Out-of-bounds Write): a memory copy in the service's parsing/handling path writes past the bounds of an allocated buffer, corrupting adjacent heap memory. Under the assessed vector the attacker must already be executing code in an authenticated low-privilege local context (PR:L) with no user interaction (UI:N) and low attack complexity (AC:L); the scope is unchanged (S:U) but confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts are all high (C:H/I:H/A:H) because successful corruption inside the service context yields SYSTEM-level code execution. CISA's SSVC evaluation records technical impact as total, while noting exploitation has not been observed and the issue is not rated automatable.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local privilege escalation by an authenticated user (AV:L, PR:L) with no user interaction (UI:N) and low complexity; memory corruption yields full SYSTEM control, so C/I/A all High.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:20 cve.org
HIGH 7.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Out-of-bounds write in Windows EAPHost Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A privilege-escalation flaw in the Windows EAPHost Service lets an attacker who already has a low-privilege foothold on a Windows 10, Windows 11, or Windows Server 2012-2025 host take full SYSTEM control of that machine. Because the attacker must already be on the endpoint, leadership should treat this as an insider and post-compromise risk amplifier rather than a perimeter threat: any single compromised user account or unpatched workstation can become a full administrative takeover. Unpatched fleets therefore raise the potential blast radius of an already-successful intrusion and should be remediated on a normal patch cycle.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 77% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Windows OS component present across nearly all Windows client and server environments
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy