Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privileged local foothold
-
DeliveryRepeatedly invoke Windows Installer operation
-
ExploitWin race on shared resource
-
ExecutionCorrupt heap during unsynchronized access
-
ImpactExecute code as SYSTEM
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already hold a valid low-privileged local account on the target Windows system (PR:L, AV:L) and to interact with Windows Installer (MSI) operations to trigger the unsynchronized access to a shared resource. The key limiting factor is the race condition itself, reflected in AC:H: success depends on winning a narrow, non-deterministic timing window, so exploitation is typically unreliable and may require many repeated attempts - consistent with CISA SSVC marking it not automatable. No user interaction is needed (UI:N), and no special non-default configuration is indicated; the primary barriers are the prior authenticated foothold and the timing difficulty, making this most relevant on shared or multi-user Windows hosts. |
| Impact | This is a locally-exploitable elevation-of-privilege flaw with a moderate CVSS of 7.0, and the surrounding signals consistently point to lower real-world urgency than the HIGH-adjacent score suggests. The CVSS vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U) requires local access, already-held low privileges, and a high-complexity attack - consistent with winning a timing-sensitive race condition rather than reliable one-shot exploitation. CISA's SSVC framework reinforces this: Exploitation is 'none' (no observed or public exploitation) and Automatable is 'no' (the race cannot be reliably scripted at scale), though Technical Impact is 'total' (full SYSTEM compromise if the race is won). No EPSS score was provided in the input, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified here. There is no CISA KEV listing and no POC indicator, so this is not a confirmed active threat. Note a classification tension to verify with the vendor: the Description characterizes this as a race condition (CWE-362 behavior), while the assigned CWE-122 and the Tags (Buffer Overflow, Heap Overflow) describe a heap-based overflow - likely the race is the trigger that leads to heap corruption, but the primary weakness labeling is inconsistent. Overall this is a patch-in-routine-cycle local EoP, not an emergency; prioritize on multi-user or shared Windows hosts where a low-privileged attacker already has a foothold. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who already has a low-privileged interactive or service account on a Windows host repeatedly triggers Windows Installer operations to win a timing window in which a shared resource is accessed without proper synchronization, corrupting the heap to run code as SYSTEM. Because AC is High, success is non-deterministic and typically requires many attempts, and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis. This is a post-compromise privilege-escalation step rather than an initial-access vector. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Local privilege escalation in Microsoft Windows Installer (msiexec) allows an authenticated low-privileged user to gain SYSTEM-level access by triggering an unsynchronized access to a shared resource during MSI package operations. Exploitation requires a valid local account (PR:L, AV:L) and hinges on winning a narrow timing window (AC:H), so attacks are typically unreliable and may need many repeated attempts - consistent with CISA SSVC rating the issue not automatable. No public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis, and EPSS/KEV signals are absent, so real-world urgency is lower than the HIGH-adjacent, 7.0 CVSS score alone might suggest; vendor patches are available for all affected Windows builds.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: Microsoft has published fixes for all affected builds - apply the applicable cumulative update so each system reaches at least these baselines: Windows 10 21H2/22H2 10.0.19044.7807, Windows 10 1607 and Server 2016 10.0.14393.9612, Windows 10 1809 and Server 2019 10.0.17763.9376, Windows 11 23H2 10.0.22631.7652, Windows 11 24H2 10.0.26100.9711, Windows 11 25H2 10.0.26200.9711, Windows 11 26H2 10.0.26300.9711, Windows 11 26H1 10.0.28000.3231, Server 2012 6.2.9200.26434, Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.23470, Server 2022 10.0.20348.5761, and Server 2025 10.0.26100.33650; route deployment through Windows Update, WSUS, or the MSRC update guide at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83775. Because the flaw requires an existing low-privileged local account and a timing race against the Installer service, the most effective compensating controls target who can reach the attack surface: restrict interactive and service logons on shared/multi-user hosts to reduce the pool of accounts that can attempt the race, and use AppLocker or WDAC to limit execution of msiexec.exe and unauthorized MSI packages to administrators (trade-off: may block legitimate user-driven software installs and requires allow-list maintenance). Raising UAC to Always Notify, or disabling the Windows Installer via the Group Policy 'Turn off Windows Installer' setting on hardened kiosk/RDP hosts, removes the trigger path entirely but will break all MSI-based installs, updates, and repairs on those systems. Monitor for repeated failed or abnormal msiexec operations and unexpected SYSTEM-level process creation as a detection backstop until patching completes.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 20 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is catalogued as CWE-122 (heap-based buffer overflow) with tags for buffer overflow and heap overflow, while the description frames it as a concurrent execution / shared-resource race condition - the practical convergence is a memory-safety defect in Windows Installer's handling of concurrently accessed shared resources, where improper synchronization lets a low-privileged process corrupt the installing service's heap. Windows Installer runs as a privileged service and processes MSI packages on behalf of callers, so a local attacker who can race its internal state can convert that corruption into elevated code execution in a higher-integrity context. The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H describes local vector, high attack complexity, low privileges required, no user interaction, and full confidentiality/integrity/availability impact within the same security scope. CISA SSVC records Technical Impact as total with Exploitation none and Automatable no, reinforcing that the primary barriers are the required pre-existing foothold and the non-deterministic timing needed to win the race.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local race condition (AV:L, AC:H) exploited by an already-authenticated low-privileged user (PR:L) with no interaction, yielding full SYSTEM compromise (C/I/A:H).
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows Installer allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Executive ViewAI
Microsoft Windows Installer (msiexec) contains a local privilege escalation issue that could let an authenticated low-privileged user gain SYSTEM-level control on affected Windows endpoints. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, and exploitation requires local access plus a difficult timing condition, so broad opportunistic attacks are unlikely. Patch available per vendor advisory, but a successful compromise could give an attacker full control of the host, making timely patching and local privilege hygiene important for reducing organizational risk.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2026-99361
GHSA-r92p-89fw-4x82
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB