Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privileged local foothold
-
DeliveryInvoke Windows Event Tracing operations
-
ExploitWin race to trigger use-after-free
-
ExecutionCorrupt freed kernel object
-
ImpactElevate privileges to SYSTEM
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already possess authenticated local access with low privileges (PR:L) on the target Windows host - this is a local privilege-escalation primitive, not a remote entry point. The specific component is Windows Event Tracing (ETW); the attacker must interact with ETW operations to reach the vulnerable freed object. The principal LIMITING factor is the High Attack Complexity (AC:H): as a use-after-free, reliable exploitation depends on winning a memory-lifecycle race condition, which is timing-dependent and not guaranteed on each attempt. No user interaction is needed (UI:N), and exploitation affects default configurations of supported Windows client and server builds below the patched versions listed in EUVD (e.g., Windows 11 24H2 before 10.0.26100.9711, Server 2025 before 10.0.26100.33650). The need for pre-existing local access and the race-condition reliability barrier substantially constrain real-world risk. |
| Impact | This is a locally-exploitable use-after-free (CWE-416) elevation-of-privilege flaw in the Windows Event Tracing (ETW) subsystem, rated CVSS 7.0 (High). The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H tells a measured story: exploitation is local (AV:L), requires an already-authenticated low-privileged attacker (PR:L), needs no user interaction (UI:N), but carries High Attack Complexity (AC:H) - consistent with the race-condition timing typical of use-after-free bugs, meaning reliable exploitation is non-trivial. Impact is total (C:H/I:H/A:H), matching the SSVC 'Technical Impact: total' rating. Crucially, the exploitation signals point AWAY from urgent priority: CISA SSVC lists Exploitation: 'none' and Automatable: 'no', there is no CISA KEV listing, no EPSS score was provided in the input, and no public proof-of-concept is referenced - so this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' The signals are internally consistent (local EoP, high complexity, not automatable, no observed exploitation), so this is best characterized as a genuine-but-not-emergency patch-cycle item rather than a drop-everything threat: it requires an attacker who already has a foothold on the host. Note that EPSS data is absent and cannot be factored in; prioritize relative to other local EoP flaws in the same Patch Tuesday set. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already gained low-privileged code execution on a Windows host (e.g., via phishing, a compromised standard user account, or a separate initial-access bug) locally triggers the use-after-free in Event Tracing by winning a timing race, corrupting kernel/privileged memory to elevate to SYSTEM. Because Attack Complexity is High (AC:H) and no public PoC is referenced, successful exploitation requires defeating the race condition reliably, which limits casual abuse. No user interaction is required once the attacker has their initial foothold. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Local privilege escalation in Microsoft Windows Event Tracing (ETW) lets an authenticated attacker who already holds low-privileged local access on a target host trigger a use-after-free condition (CWE-416) and execute code in a more privileged security context, potentially reaching SYSTEM. The flaw carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.0 (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H): it is a local-only primitive that requires pre-existing low-privilege credentials, no user interaction, and is gated by High Attack Complexity because reliable exploitation hinges on winning a memory-lifecycle race rather than a deterministic trigger. All supported Windows client and server builds below the vendor-patched revision levels are affected, including Windows 10 21H2/22H2, Windows 11 23H2/24H2/25H2/26H1/26H2, Windows Server 2016/2019/2022/2025 and their Server Core installations, and Microsoft has released fixes; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, no CISA KEV listing, and CISA's SSVC framework rates exploitation as none and the activity as not automatable, so this should be treated as a high-value post-compromise escalation primitive rather than an imminent mass-exploitation threat.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: Microsoft has published fixes via the MSRC update guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83707); apply the current cumulative Windows update so each host reaches or exceeds the fixed build listed in EUVD-2026-99339 - Windows 10 21H2/22H2 to 10.0.19044.7807 or later, Windows 10 1607/Server 2016 to 10.0.14393.9612, Windows 10 1809/Server 2019 to 10.0.17763.9376, Windows 11 23H2 to 10.0.22631.7652, Windows 11 24H2 and Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.33650 or 10.0.26100.9711 as appropriate for the SKU, Windows 11 25H2 to 10.0.26200.9711, Windows 11 26H1 to 10.0.28000.3231, Windows 11 26H2 to 10.0.26300.9711, and Windows Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5761. Until patching completes, the effective compensating controls are those that deny the prerequisite rather than the bug itself: audit and aggressively trim local interactive and service accounts so that PR:L access is not broadly available on high-value hosts, restrict RDP, console, and interactive logon to trusted administrators, and treat any low-privileged foothold on a Windows endpoint as a potential stepping stone to SYSTEM - note the trade-off that these controls reduce operational flexibility for helpdesk and shared-workstation scenarios but directly remove the attacker prerequisite. Do not attempt to disable or unload the ETW subsystem as a mitigation: ETW is a core OS component consumed by Windows Event Log, Defender, and most EDR/SIEM agents, so stopping trace sessions or blocking provider registration degrades the very telemetry needed to detect this exploitation and can destabilize the host, and it would not remove the vulnerable code path. Detection effort is better spent on behavioral monitoring for anomalous ETW session creation/teardown, unexpected writes to provider registration structures, and crashes or unexpected restarts of tracing and logging processes, since the UAF's first symptom is often localized memory corruption or availability loss before privilege escalation. Finally, because exploitation requires a race-condition win, EDR heuristics tuned for repeated rapid ETW manipulation and post-exploit token or process-context elevation on the same host provide the best chance of catching attempts that the patch has not yet blocked.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 16 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Windows Event Tracing is the operating system's built-in instrumentation and diagnostics framework; it underpins provider registration and callback dispatch (EtwRegister/EtwUnregister and the Etw* provider APIs), trace session and buffer management (StartTrace/ControlTrace/StopTrace, ETW logger and consumer threads), and the event log channel plumbing that feeds Windows Event Log and third-party telemetry agents such as EDR and SIEM collectors. The vulnerability class is CWE-416 (Use After Free), meaning an object allocated for ETW bookkeeping - most plausibly a trace session, provider registration, or consumer context structure - is released while a thread or callback still holds a pointer to it, and a subsequent dereference operates on reallocated or attacker-influenced memory. This is the classic route from memory corruption to controlled write or function-pointer hijack, which is why the assessed integrity and confidentiality impacts are High despite the Local attack vector and unchanged scope. The High Attack Complexity rating is directly explained by the UAF nature of the bug: the attacker must interleave ETW registration, tracing, or session-teardown activity with the vulnerable free path in a way that wins a timing window, so the primitive is not deterministic and may require repeated attempts, heap grooming, or failure-tolerant retry logic. The accompanying tags (Denial Of Service, Use After Free, Memory Corruption) are consistent with a UAF whose first observable symptom is often a crash of the tracing or logging process, with privilege escalation as the pursued secondary effect, and the CPE/version data confirms exposure is broad and configuration-independent across default installs of the listed builds.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local EoP requiring an authenticated low-priv user (AV:L/PR:L); use-after-free race condition justifies AC:H; privilege escalation to SYSTEM yields full C:H/I:H/A:H with unchanged scope.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Use after free in Windows Event Tracing allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Executive ViewAI
A high-severity local privilege-escalation flaw in Microsoft Windows Event Tracing affects supported Windows client and server builds, allowing an authenticated attacker who already holds low-privileged local access to potentially gain SYSTEM-level control on a host. The immediate business risk is concentrated in shared endpoints and servers where unprivileged users or compromised accounts can execute code locally, because elevation could enable credential theft, persistence, and lateral movement across the environment. Leadership should prioritize patching affected Windows systems and limiting unnecessary local privileges to reduce the window for host-level compromise.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.
Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2026-99339
GHSA-3mjg-j8h9-9c7g
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB