Skip to main content

Remote Desktop Client CVE-2026-83688

| EUVDEUVD-2026-99328 HIGH
Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-cr9h-7wwm-7crx
8.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Lure victim to malicious RDP server
  2. Delivery
    Client initiates RDP connection
  3. Exploit
    Server sends crafted RDP data
  4. Execution
    Trigger heap buffer overflow in client
  5. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code as user

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the victim to actively initiate an RDP session from the Windows Remote Desktop Client to an attacker-controlled or compromised RDP server (consistent with UI:R) - the attacker cannot trigger it against a passive client. There is no listening-service or inbound attack surface; the limiting factor is the required user action of connecting outbound (e.g., opening a malicious .rdp file or following a crafted connection prompt). No authentication to the victim system is needed (PR:N), and default client configurations are affected across all listed Windows/Windows Server builds, but the social-engineering step to make the victim connect is the primary practical barrier to exploitation.

Impact

This is a credible, high-priority patch item but not an emergency drop-everything issue. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, score 8.8) indicates a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated flaw with total CIA impact, but the UI:R flag is decisive: this is a client-side vulnerability in the Remote Desktop Client, meaning a victim must be induced to connect to an attacker-controlled or compromised RDP endpoint - the attacker cannot simply reach out and hit a listening service. The signals are internally consistent and point to targeted rather than mass exploitation: CISA SSVC lists Exploitation as 'none' and Automatable as 'no' (the required user interaction defeats automated/wormable spraying), while Technical Impact is 'total,' matching the C:H/I:H/A:H and CWE-122 heap overflow leading to code execution. There is no CISA KEV listing and no EPSS score was provided in the input, and no public exploit was supplied, so there is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' Net: real priority due to ubiquitous Windows footprint and total impact, but realistic exploitation is gated behind social engineering, lowering immediate urgency relative to a PR:N/UI:N server-side RCE. Note: EPSS data is absent from the input and cannot be weighed here.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker stands up a malicious or compromised RDP server and lures a victim (via phishing link, .rdp file attachment, or a hijacked connection) into connecting their Windows Remote Desktop Client to it. The malicious server returns crafted RDP protocol data that overflows a heap buffer in the client, achieving arbitrary code execution in the context of the connecting user. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.8% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft's Windows Remote Desktop Client (mstsc.exe) lets an unauthorized remote attacker execute code over a network when a victim connects outbound to a malicious or compromised RDP server, per CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (8.8). Because the vulnerable component is the client rather than a listening service, exploitation is not automatable against passive hosts - it hinges on user action such as opening a crafted .rdp file or following a malicious connection prompt, which is why CISA's SSVC assessment records Exploitation: none and Automatable: no. Microsoft has published fixes and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis; the issue is a high-priority patching item but not an emergency drop-everything event.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: Microsoft has shipped fixes for CVE-2026-83688 in its Windows cumulative updates; apply the update that raises each affected build to at least the fixed revision recorded by EUVD - Windows 10 1607 to 10.0.14393.9612, Windows 10 1809 to 10.0.17763.9376, Windows 10 21H2/22H2 to 10.0.19044.7807, Windows 11 23H2 to 10.0.22631.7652, Windows 11 24H2 to 10.0.26100.9711, Windows 11 25H2 to 10.0.26200.9711, Windows 11 26H1 to 10.0.28000.3231, Windows 11 26H2 to 10.0.26300.9711, Windows Server 2012 to 6.2.9200.26434, Windows Server 2012 R2 to 6.3.9600.23470, Windows Server 2016 to 10.0.14393.9612, Windows Server 2019 to 10.0.17763.9376, Windows Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5761, and Windows Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.33650 - following the advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83688. Because the flaw is only reachable when the user initiates an outbound RDP session to an untrusted server, compensating controls should target that path: block outbound TCP/UDP 3389 (and RDP over HTTPS gateways) from client endpoints to untrusted networks at the host firewall or perimeter, with the trade-off that legitimate outbound remote administration from those machines stops working; restrict launching mstsc.exe and opening .rdp files via AppLocker or WDAC application/file rules, or disable the Remote Desktop Connection client through Group Policy, with the trade-off that all RDP client use - including legitimate - is blocked on affected hosts; and pair either control with user awareness guidance not to open unsolicited .rdp attachments or connection prompts, since the SSVC rating of Automatable: no means unattended mass exploitation is not expected but targeted social engineering remains the realistic delivery vector.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

CVE-2026-83688 is a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) in the Windows Remote Desktop Client, the component that implements the client side of the Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) and is exposed through mstsc.exe and .rdp connection files. Classic heap overflow root cause: the client trusts a length or count field in server-supplied protocol data (connection negotiation, server-to-client channel data, or capability exchange) and writes past the end of an allocated heap buffer without adequate bounds validation, corrupting adjacent heap metadata and objects. Because the attacker is the RDP server side of the session - not a listener on the victim host - there is no inbound service or port to attack; the victim must initiate the outbound session (UI:R), while no authentication to the victim system is required (PR:N) and the flaw is reachable in default client configurations across every listed Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server build, including Server Core installations. A successful heap corruption in the client process yields code execution in the context of the connecting user with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact (S:U), consistent with the SSVC Technical Impact rating of total.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Client-side heap overflow reachable over the network with no auth, but requires the user to connect to a malicious RDP server (UI:R); code execution yields full C/I/A impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:20 cve.org
HIGH 8.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Heap-based buffer overflow in Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A critical-severity memory corruption flaw in Microsoft's Windows Remote Desktop Client (mstsc.exe) means an employee who simply connects to a hostile or compromised RDP server could have their workstation taken over and their data, credentials, and files exposed or tampered with. The risk is concentrated in any workforce that initiates outbound RDP sessions - IT administrators, remote support staff, and third-party contractors - and it cannot spread without a user opening a crafted connection file or accepting a malicious prompt. Leadership should treat this as a scheduled, high-priority patch obligation rather than a crisis, because the attacker must first lure a user into connecting.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.8%
Top 43% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Remote Desktop Client ships across all supported Windows and Windows Server versions
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.8%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

45
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy