Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privilege local code execution
-
DeliveryTrigger use-after-free race in kernel object
-
ExploitReclaim freed allocation with controlled data
-
ExecutionCorrupt kernel memory structures
-
ImpactElevate to SYSTEM privileges
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already have local, authenticated access with low privileges on the target Windows host (AV:L/PR:L) - there is no remote or network-facing path and no user interaction is needed (UI:N). The high attack complexity (AC:H) implies a timing-dependent precondition, characteristic of winning a use-after-free race on a kernel object, so reliable exploitation is non-trivial and may require multiple attempts. Limiting factors: the need for a pre-existing local foothold, the race-condition reliability barrier, the absence of any public exploit code, and applicability only to the enumerated unpatched builds (e.g., Windows 11 24H2 below 10.0.26100.9711 and Windows Server 2025 below 10.0.26100.33650). Installing the available Microsoft update removes the condition entirely. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but moderate-urgency issue rather than a drop-everything emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U, 7.0 HIGH) describes a local-only attack (AV:L) that requires an already-authenticated low-privilege foothold (PR:L) and high attack complexity (AC:H), typically indicating a race condition or non-deterministic heap state common to use-after-free (CWE-416) flaws. The technical impact is total (C:H/I:H/A:H), consistent with full SYSTEM-level privilege elevation if exploitation succeeds. The signals are internally consistent and point toward LOW immediate risk: CISA SSVC lists Exploitation=none and Automatable=no, there is no CISA KEV listing and no public POC identified, so there is no evidence of active exploitation or weaponization. The AC:H and PR:L requirements further constrain real-world abuse to attackers who already have code execution on the host (e.g., post-compromise or malicious local user). The main factor elevating priority is prevalence - the Windows Kernel is ubiquitous - so while per-host risk is gated by local access and race-condition reliability, the enormous install base means this belongs in the next scheduled patch cycle. No major conflicts in the data, though note the 'Denial Of Service' tag sits alongside an elevation-of-privilege description; the A:H impact makes DoS a plausible secondary outcome but the primary vector per the description and SSVC (Technical Impact: total) is privilege escalation. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already gained low-privileged code execution on a Windows host (e.g., via phishing, a standard user account, or a sandboxed process) triggers a use-after-free race condition in the Windows Kernel to corrupt kernel memory and elevate to SYSTEM. Because the flaw has high attack complexity (AC:H), the attacker likely needs to repeatedly win a timing-sensitive race, and no public exploit code is currently available, raising the practical bar. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Privilege escalation in the Windows Kernel lets an authenticated local attacker with low privileges trigger a timing-dependent use-after-free in kernel memory and, on success, execute code at a higher integrity level (SYSTEM) on the affected host. Only unpatched Windows 11 24H2/25H2/26H1/26H2 and Windows Server 2025 builds are in scope, and the attacker must already hold a local foothold on the machine - there is no remote or network-facing path. CISA's SSVC assessment records no exploitation and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, but because the technical impact is rated total and a vendor patch is already shipping, the update should be treated as a routine-but-priority patch rather than an emergency.
RemediationAI
Primary fix: install the Microsoft security update referenced in the MSRC Update Guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83675), which moves each affected branch to its listed fixed build - Windows 11 24H2 to 10.0.26100.9711 or later, 25H2 to 10.0.26200.9711 or later, 26H1 to 10.0.28000.3231 or later, 26H2 to 10.0.26300.9711 or later, and Windows Server 2025 (including Server Core) to 10.0.26100.33650 or later; this is classified as 'Patch available per vendor advisory', with the fix delivered through the normal Windows cumulative-update channel, so standard servicing (Windows Update, WSUS, or Intune) and a reboot are required for the kernel change to take effect. Because exploitation requires an existing local low-privileged foothold (AV:L/PR:L) and an AC:H race, the practical risk reduction before patching comes from shrinking that foothold and raising the cost of the race: enforce least privilege so that interactive and service accounts cannot run arbitrary user-mode code, restrict local logon and RDP rights to users who genuinely need them, and use WDAC or AppLocker to block untrusted binaries and script interpreters on high-value terminals - the trade-off is potential breakage of legitimate line-of-business tooling and additional helpdesk load. Attack-surface reduction on servers (disabling unnecessary interactive sessions, removing unneeded local admin rights, and tightening who can launch low-integrity processes) lowers the chance an attacker ever reaches the prerequisite state, at the cost of operational flexibility. Monitoring-wise, enable kernel-level exploit protection (HVCI/Memory Integrity and, where feasible, kernel pool hardening) on the affected builds, since these features make use-after-free primitives materially harder to weaponize; be aware that HVCI can degrade performance and conflict with third-party kernel drivers. Finally, treat unexplained bugchecks, unexpected reboots, or repeated crashes on host endpoints as a possible signal of failed race attempts and investigate rather than dismiss them, and prioritize patching of internet-exposed or multi-user systems (RDP hosts, terminal servers, jump boxes) where a low-privileged foothold is most easily obtained. No vendor-released workaround that removes the flaw itself is documented; there is no evidence of active exploitation, so emergency out-of-band measures are not indicated, but the update should be scheduled within normal patch-cycle commitments.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 6 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause class is CWE-416 (Use After Free), a memory-corruption pattern in which a kernel object or pool allocation is freed while a stale pointer to it remains reachable, so a subsequent dereference operates on attacker-influenced or reallocated memory. In the Windows kernel this gives a local attacker a classic primitive for corrupting kernel structures and redirecting execution under kernel privileges. The assessed vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H is consistent with that mechanism: AV:L/PR:L means the attacker must already be running code on the box with ordinary user rights, UI:N means no victim interaction or lure is required, and AC:H reflects a timing/race precondition - the window between free and reuse must be hit reliably, which typically demands repeated attempts, heap grooming, or system-load manipulation rather than a single deterministic call. Scope is unchanged (S:U), and the high confidentiality, integrity, and availability ratings match the 'Memory Corruption' and 'Denial Of Service' tags attached to this entry: a failed race can crash the host, while a successful one yields full kernel-level control. Windows Kernel privilege-escalation bugs of this shape are commonly chained after an initial browser or document compromise to convert user-level code execution into SYSTEM, which is why they carry weight even without a network attack surface.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local kernel UAF needs an existing low-priv foothold (PR:L) and a timing race (AC:H); successful escalation yields full SYSTEM control, so C/I/A all High.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Use after free in Windows Kernel allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Executive ViewAI
A high-severity Windows Kernel privilege-escalation flaw affects Windows 11 24H2/25H2/26H1/26H2 and Windows Server 2025 builds, allowing an attacker who already holds a local foothold on a machine to elevate to SYSTEM-level control of that host. Exposure is confined to endpoints and servers in those build families and cannot be reached remotely or over the network, and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis - a vendor patch is already available. Leadership should treat this as a scheduled priority-patching obligation for IT operations rather than a crisis, with the main organizational risk being an existing local compromise being escalated into full host control on unpatched systems.
Apply vendor patch. If immediate deployment is not possible, restrict local interactive logon and local administrator rights to the minimum necessary population, increase monitoring for suspicious token or integrity-level elevation activity on affected hosts, and prioritize patching of any system where local access is widely shared.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.
Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2026-99324
GHSA-v687-ch6q-f8cg
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB