Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privilege authenticated network access
-
ExploitSend crafted IKE/IPsec packets to IKE Extension
-
ExecutionTrigger out-of-bounds read in parser
-
ImpactDisclose adjacent process memory contents
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation targets the Windows IKE (Internet Key Exchange / IPsec) Extension, so the affected host must have IKE/IPsec processing reachable by the attacker - typically systems running IPsec, IKEv2 VPN, or Windows Firewall with Advanced Security connection-security rules. Per the CVSS vector, the attacker must be authorized (PR:L), meaning some level of authenticated or trusted access is required rather than fully anonymous access; no user interaction is needed (UI:N) and attack complexity is low (AC:L). The impact is limited to confidentiality (information disclosure of process memory) with no integrity or availability effect, which bounds realistic risk. Limiting factors: the required privilege level and the need for the IKE Extension to be exposed/enabled to the attacker's network path. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-severity information-disclosure flaw that signals should be read as 'patch on normal cycle,' not 'emergency.' The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, 6.5) indicates a low-complexity network-reachable attack but one that requires existing privileges (PR:L), with only confidentiality impact (C:H) and no integrity or availability effect. CISA's SSVC decision supports a low-urgency posture: Exploitation=none (no observed exploitation), Automatable=no, and Technical Impact=partial. There is no CISA KEV listing and no public POC in the provided data, so active or widespread exploitation is not indicated. EPSS is not provided, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified here. The signals are consistent rather than conflicting: a real but bounded issue affecting an enormously deployed platform (Windows), where the authentication requirement (PR:L) and lack of integrity/availability impact materially cap real-world risk. Note one tension to verify: the CVSS confidentiality rating is High (C:H) while CISA's Technical Impact is only 'partial,' suggesting the memory disclosure, though rated high-confidentiality, may expose limited or non-deterministic data. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who already holds low-level authenticated access reachable to the target sends specially crafted IKE (IPsec key-exchange) traffic to the Windows IKE Extension, triggering an out-of-bounds read that returns adjacent process memory in the response or error path. The leaked memory could contain sensitive material such as cryptographic key fragments, tokens, or other process data useful for follow-on attacks. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and the low attack complexity (AC:L) means a working exploit, if developed, would be reliable to trigger. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Memory disclosure in the Windows IKE (Internet Key Exchange) Extension lets an attacker who already holds low-level authorized access on the target read out-of-bounds process memory and leak potentially sensitive data over the network. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, 6.5) confirms a low-complexity, network-reachable attack that requires existing privileges, needs no user interaction, and produces only confidentiality impact with no integrity or availability effect. Microsoft has released vendor patches, no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and CISA's SSVC assessment records exploitation as 'none' with partial technical impact, so this should be treated as a normal-cycle patch rather than an emergency.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: Microsoft's security update fixes the out-of-bounds read - deploy it through Windows Update or the MSRC updating guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83521) and verify each host reaches the fixed build for its release (for example 10.0.22631.7652 on Windows 11 23H2, 10.0.26100.9711 on 24H2/25H2-adjacent 26H2 builds, 10.0.17763.9376 on Server 2019, 10.0.20348.5761 on Server 2022, 10.0.26100.33650 on Server 2025, and the corresponding 6.2.9200.26434 / 6.3.9600.23470 builds on the legacy Server 2012 and 2012 R2 platforms). If immediate patching is not possible, reduce exposure of the IKE Extension: block inbound UDP 500 and 4500 (and IPsec ESP/AH) from untrusted networks at the perimeter so crafted IKE payloads cannot reach the parser - the trade-off is that this breaks IKEv2 VPN client connectivity and site-to-site tunnels terminating on those hosts. On machines that do not terminate IPsec or IKEv2, disable the relevant Windows Firewall with Advanced Security connection-security rules and stop or restrict the IKE service so the vulnerable parser is not reachable - the trade-off is loss of IPsec-protected traffic to and from that host. Where tunnels are required in the interim, restrict IKE peers to a small allowlist of known VPN gateways and monitor for anomalous IKE traffic, since the vector's PR:L prerequisite means the attacker must already hold an authorized/trusted position. None of these controls address the root cause, so patching on a normal maintenance cycle remains the primary fix; no vendor patch-absent condition applies here.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 20 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is a CWE-125 out-of-bounds read inside the Windows implementation of the IKE (Internet Key Exchange) Extension, the component that handles IKEv1/IKEv2 negotiation for IPsec. When Windows processes IKE packets - for example as part of an IKEv2 VPN, a site-to-site IPsec tunnel, or a Windows Firewall with Advanced Security connection-security rule - the extension parses attacker-influenced payload structures without adequately bounds-checking the length/offset fields, so the parser can read past the end of an allocated buffer and return adjacent process memory to the peer. Because the read is the primitive rather than a write, there is no memory-corruption or code-execution path here; the realistic outcome is disclosure of heap or stack contents, which can include pointers or other data useful for follow-on attacks. The CVSS vector's PR:L indicates the attacker must occupy an authorized or trusted position relative to the affected host (consistent with IKE negotiation requiring credentials or an established trust relationship rather than fully anonymous reachability), and UI:N plus AC:L mean no victim interaction and no special conditions beyond that access. Exploitability therefore depends on the host actually running and exposing IKE/IPsec processing to the attacker's network path.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Network-facing IKE service (AV:N, AC:L) requires attacker authorization (PR:L, no UI); an out-of-bounds read discloses memory (C:H) with no integrity or availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Out-of-bounds read in Windows IKE Extension allows an authorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
EUVD-2026-99300
GHSA-9rgq-7w7w-hfxm
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB