Skip to main content

Windows Partition Driver CVE-2026-83514

| EUVDEUVD-2026-99908 HIGH
Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-fxg8-grfv-4gmw
7.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged local foothold
  2. Delivery
    Craft malicious driver IOCTL/input
  3. Exploit
    Trigger heap buffer overflow in partition driver
  4. Execution
    Corrupt kernel memory for code execution
  5. Impact
    Elevate to SYSTEM privileges

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already have authenticated local access and the ability to run code as a low-privileged user on the target host (CVSS PR:L, AV:L); there is no remote or network-facing attack surface and no user interaction is needed. The attacker must be able to reach the Windows Partition Management Driver (e.g., issue device I/O to it), which is present by default on all supported Windows client and server builds, so no special or non-default configuration is required once local access exists. The primary limiting factor is the need for a pre-existing local foothold - this is a post-compromise escalation, not an initial-access vector - which is why CISA rates it Automatable: no.

Impact

This is a credible but not emergency-tier privilege-escalation issue. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.8 HIGH) is internally consistent with the description of an 'authorized attacker' elevating privileges 'locally': local attack vector, low complexity, and low privileges already required (PR:L), with high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The signals point away from widespread opportunistic exploitation: CISA SSVC lists Exploitation as 'none' and Automatable as 'no' (consistent with a local-only EoP that cannot be sprayed remotely), though Technical Impact is 'total,' matching the C:H/I:H/A:H kernel-driver compromise. This CVE is NOT in CISA KEV and no POC is referenced, so it is not confirmed exploited. No EPSS score was supplied in the input, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified here. Net: a genuine SYSTEM-level escalation primitive worth patching on standard Patch Tuesday timelines, but it requires an attacker to already have a foothold and local code execution, so it is a second-stage/post-compromise risk rather than an internet-facing emergency.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already gained low-privileged local code execution on a Windows host (for example via phishing, a malicious installer, or a compromised standard user account) invokes the vulnerable Windows Partition Management Driver with crafted input that overflows a heap buffer, corrupting kernel memory to gain SYSTEM privileges. No user interaction is required (UI:N) and attack complexity is low (AC:L). No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Local privilege escalation in the Windows Partition Management Driver lets an attacker who already holds a low-privileged local foothold on the host trigger a heap-based buffer overflow in kernel mode and gain full SYSTEM-level code execution. The flaw is rated CVSS 7.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), meaning no user interaction and no network surface are involved - the only prerequisite is authenticated local access and the ability to issue crafted I/O to the driver, which ships by default on every affected Windows build. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and CISA's SSVC assessment records Exploitation: none and Automatable: no, so this is a post-compromise escalation and not an initial-access vector; a vendor patch is available.

RemediationAI

Apply the Microsoft update for CVE-2026-83514 from the MSRC update guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-83514); the advisory's build thresholds define the patched minimums referenced in the EUVD data - for example 10.0.26100.9711 for Windows 11 24H2, 10.0.26100.33650 for Windows 11 25H2 and Windows Server 2025, 10.0.22631.7652 for Windows 11 23H2, 10.0.19044.7807 for Windows 10 21H2/22H2, 10.0.14393.9612 for Windows 10 1607 and Windows Server 2016, 10.0.17763.9376 for Windows 10 1809 and Windows Server 2019, 10.0.20348.5761 for Windows Server 2022, and 6.2.9200.26434 / 6.3.9600.23470 for Windows Server 2012 and 2012 R2. Because the driver is a required kernel-mode component of the storage stack, there is no supported way to disable or unload it, and blocking access to it would break partition and volume management, so the practical compensating controls are aimed at denying the prerequisite local foothold rather than at the driver itself: enforce application control such as WDAC or AppLocker to stop untrusted binaries from running under a low-privileged account (trade-off: requires a maintained allow-list and can break unsigned or line-of-business software), restrict interactive logon and local execution rights so that standard users cannot launch arbitrary code on sensitive servers (trade-off: reduces administrative flexibility), and deploy least-privilege and credential-hygiene controls to make the initial local compromise harder. Since the attack is local-only with no user interaction, endpoint detection should focus on unexpected device I/O requests to the partition management driver and on unusual child processes spawning from low-privileged contexts, and the patch should be prioritised on multi-user systems, RDP/VDI hosts and servers where several low-privileged accounts already execute code.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability is a CWE-122 heap-based buffer overflow, the classic class in which a length or size value derived from externally supplied input is trusted without adequate bounds validation, so a write into a heap-allocated buffer overruns its allocation and corrupts adjacent kernel memory. The affected component is the Windows Partition Management Driver, a kernel-mode storage-stack driver that services partition and volume management requests for the operating system; because it is a default, always-loaded component on both client and server SKUs, it exposes an attack surface to any locally executing process that can open a handle and send I/O control requests to the device. Under the assessed vector (AV:L, PR:L, UI:N), a low-privileged authenticated user can supply a malformed request that overflows the driver's heap buffer; because the corruption occurs in kernel memory, successful exploitation converts the low-privileged context into ring-0 code execution, yielding the high confidentiality, integrity and availability impact reflected in the score. The SSVC technical-impact rating of "total" reflects that full kernel compromise on the target host, while the Automatable: no rating reflects the requirement for a pre-existing local foothold and a bespoke trigger rather than a remotely sprayable exploit. EUVD lists the affected codebases across the full Windows 10, Windows 11 and Windows Server 2012-through-2025 families, confirming the driver is present in the default install base rather than an optional feature set.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local-only EoP requiring an existing low-privileged account (AV:L, PR:L) with straightforward triggering (AC:L); kernel heap overflow yields full SYSTEM compromise, so C:H/I:H/A:H.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:19 cve.org
HIGH 7.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Partition Management Driver allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity local privilege escalation flaw in the Windows Partition Management Driver allows anyone who already has a low-privileged foothold on a Windows host to escalate to full SYSTEM-level control of the machine. Because this driver ships by default on every affected Windows build, the exposure spans the entire Windows estate rather than a niche subset of systems, and the flaw turns any minor compromise, stolen credential, or malicious insider action into total host takeover. Leadership should treat this as a containment and blast-radius issue: it does not create new entry points, but it undermines endpoint defenses and lateral-movement barriers on any machine an attacker has already touched.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 74% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
core Windows kernel driver shipped on all supported client and server editions
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy