Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessIdentify network-reachable SCG endpoint
-
DeliverySend unauthenticated HTTP request with SSRF payload
-
ExploitSCG server issues uncontrolled outbound request
-
ExecutionServer connections or threads exhausted
-
ImpactSCG service availability disrupted
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | No authentication is required - the vulnerable endpoint is exposed to unauthenticated remote attackers, as confirmed by PR:N and UI:N in the CVSS vector. The attack is fully automatable (SSVC: Automatable yes), requiring only network reachability to the SCG service. There is no described requirement for a special configuration mode, specific feature flag, or non-default setting. What limits exploitation is deployment context: SCG appliances are typically internal enterprise tools and may not be directly internet-exposed; however, any network-adjacent attacker (including those on internal segments) can exploit this without credentials. Impact is strictly availability - no conditions exist in the available data that would elevate this to confidentiality or integrity breach. |
| Impact | Raw CVSS of 7.5 (High) is driven by full network accessibility, no authentication, and high availability impact - a configuration that makes this look urgent on paper. However, several signals temper that urgency. EPSS is only 0.18% (8th percentile), indicating very low observed or modeled exploitation activity. CISA SSVC rates exploitation as none and technical impact as partial, consistent with a DoS-only outcome. There is no CISA KEV entry and no known public proof-of-concept. The impact is strictly denial of service - no credential theft, no lateral movement, no data exposure - which limits the worst-case business consequence to service disruption of the SCG management plane. For organizations relying on SCG for automated support workflows, unavailability could indirectly delay hardware diagnostics, but this is operationally bounded. SSVC marks it as automatable (yes), meaning a scanner or script could repeatedly trigger DoS, raising the nuisance-attack potential. Overall: patch promptly during the next maintenance window, but this does not warrant emergency out-of-band remediation unless SCG uptime is critical-path for operations. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An external or internal attacker with network access to an exposed SCG management endpoint crafts an HTTP request containing a SSRF payload pointing to a resource designed to cause resource exhaustion (e.g., a slow-responding or loopback endpoint). The SCG server fetches the attacker-controlled target, consuming connection slots or memory until the service becomes unresponsive. Because no authentication is required, this can be automated and repeated to maintain a persistent denial-of-service condition. No public exploit code is known at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv2 – Sep 09, 2026
Server-Side Request Forgery in Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) 5.0 enables unauthenticated remote attackers to cause denial of service against both the Application and Appliance (Virtual Edition) deployment forms. The CVSS vector confirms fully unauthenticated network exploitation with no user interaction, targeting availability exclusively - confidentiality and integrity are unaffected. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified; EPSS places this in the 8th percentile, and the CISA SSVC assessment lists exploitation status as none.
Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
Server-Side Request Forgery in Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) 5.0 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to direct the server to issue outbound requests to attacker-controlled or internal destinations, with the vendor citing denial-of-service as a primary outcome. The CVSS 7.3 vector (C:L/I:L/A:L) goes beyond the description's DoS framing, reflecting SSRF's canonical ability to probe internal services and relay limited requests - a discrepancy that is vendor-originated and worth noting. No public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: SCG Application 5.36.00.00 and SCG Appliance (Virtual Edition) 5.36.00.16, per Dell Security Advisory DSA-2026-382 (https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-in/000503426/dsa-2026-382-security-update-for-dell-secure-connect-gateway-virtual-edition-multiple-vulnerabilities). Administrators should update the Application edition to 5.36.00.00 or later and the Appliance/Virtual edition to 5.36.00.16 or later. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict network access to the SCG management interface using firewall rules or network segmentation, permitting only trusted management hosts to reach SCG endpoints - this reduces the attack surface since AV:N/PR:N means any network-reachable host can trigger the SSRF. Note that restricting access may limit SCG's own outbound communication to Dell support infrastructure; verify that permitted egress rules remain intact after applying any inbound ACLs.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) is an enterprise support-automation appliance that facilitates secure, automated telemetry and support communications between Dell hardware and Dell support infrastructure. The vulnerability is classified as CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery), meaning the application accepts attacker-supplied input that it uses to construct outbound HTTP/network requests, without adequately validating or restricting the destination. In this SSRF variant, the crafted request does not appear to enable internal network pivot or data exfiltration (C:N/I:N in the CVSS vector), but instead causes resource exhaustion or connection-loop conditions that degrade or halt SCG service availability. Two deployment forms are affected: the Application edition (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:dell:secure_connect_gateway:*:*:*:*:application:*:*:*) and the Virtual/Appliance edition (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:dell:secure_connect_gateway:*:*:*:*:virtual:*:*:*).
Know when Secure Connect Gateway gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Network-reachable, no auth required, no interaction needed; impact is strictly availability via DoS, no confidentiality or integrity effect.
Primary rating from Vendor (emc).
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionNVD
Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to denial of service.
Executive ViewAI
Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) 5.0 contains an unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability allowing remote attackers to cause denial of service against production deployments. While no active exploitation has been identified to date and a patch is available, organizations running SCG 5.0 face potential disruption to secure connectivity services from unauthenticated network attacks.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
More in Secure Connect Gateway
View allLocal privilege escalation to root in Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) 5.0 lets a low-privileged operator with SSH acce
Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) 5.0 Appliance - SRS, version(s) 5.24, contains a Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographi
Dell SCG, versions prior to 5.22.00.00, contain a SQL Injection Vulnerability in the SCG UI for an internal assets REST
Dell Secure Connect Gateway 5.20 contains an improper authentication vulnerability during the SRS to SCG update path. Ra
Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) 5.0 Appliance - SRS, version(s) 5.24, contains an Improper Certificate Validation vuln
Dell SCG, versions prior to 5.22.00.00, contain a SQL Injection Vulnerability in the SCG UI for an internal audit REST A
Path traversal vulnerability in Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) versions 5.28.00.xx through 5.32.00.xx allows high-pri
Certificate hostname validation failure in Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) 5.0 enables an unauthenticated remote attac
Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) 5.0 Appliance and Application, version(s) versions 5.26 to 5.30, contain(s) an Executi
SQL injection in Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) 5.0 allows a remote low-privileged attacker to extract sensitive data
Hardcoded cryptographic key exposure in Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) 5.0 allows a remote low-privileged attacker to
Dell SCG 5.14 contains an information disclosure vulnerability during the SRS to SCG upgrade path. Rated medium severity
EUVD-2026-74764
GHSA-7rc5-fh65-vpm3
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB