Skip to main content

Maximo AI Service CVE-2026-78673

| EUVDEUVD-2026-97898 HIGH
Improper Input Validation (CWE-20)
2026-10-12 psirt@us.ibm.com GHSA-25fm-f8v8-9pqg
7.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: us
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach Maximo AI Service over network
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted malformed input
  3. Exploit
    Trigger improper input validation (CWE-20)
  4. Execution
    Service crashes or hangs
  5. Impact
    Denial of service to users

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires network reachability to the IBM Maximo AI Service API/interface (versions 9.1.0 and 9.2.0); per AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N no authentication, user interaction, or special configuration is stated as required, so default network-exposed deployments are at risk. The description does not name the specific vulnerable feature, endpoint, parameter, or input format that triggers the improper input validation, so the concrete trigger could not be extracted from available data. The principal limiting factor is exposure scope: impact is confined to availability (service disruption) with no data compromise, and risk is materially reduced where the AI Service is not exposed beyond trusted internal networks.

Impact

The input CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H, base 7.5) describes a remotely reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated flaw whose sole impact is availability (C:N/I:N), consistent with a denial-of-service condition from improper input validation (CWE-20). All signals agree on 'high severity by score, availability-only impact' - there is no confidentiality or integrity exposure and no code execution implied. However, the real-world priority signals are largely MISSING: no EPSS probability was provided, the CVE is NOT listed in CISA KEV, and no public proof-of-concept is referenced. With no exploitation-probability or active-exploitation data, this reads as a high-CVSS issue whose true urgency cannot be elevated above 'patch in normal cycle' from the data alone. The single reference is an IBM support page (node/7290473) reported by IBM PSIRT; exact triggering input and whether exploitation requires reachable/authenticated API endpoints is NOT detailed in the available description - verify affected deployment exposure with IBM's advisory.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A remote attacker with network access to the IBM Maximo AI Service endpoint sends malformed or malicious input that the service fails to validate properly, causing the service to crash or become unresponsive and denying asset-management functionality to legitimate users. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) indicates this can be triggered over the network, at low complexity, without authentication or user interaction. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 12, 2026

Denial of service in IBM Maximo AI Service 9.1.0 and 9.2.0 lets remote, unauthenticated attackers disrupt the service through improper input validation (CWE-20), with impact limited to availability and no confidentiality or integrity loss. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H, base 7.5) indicates the flaw is network reachable, low complexity, and requires no privileges or user interaction, so any deployment exposing the AI Service interface beyond trusted internal networks is at risk. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and the CVE is not listed as confirmed actively exploited (CISA KEV); the practical risk is driven by exposure scope rather than observed attack activity.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version is identified in the available data, so the first step is to track IBM's advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7290473 for an updated fix level for Maximo AI Service 9.1.0 and 9.2.0 and apply it as soon as it is published. Until then, apply compensating controls matched to the availability-only, unauthenticated, network-reachable nature of the flaw: block external access to the Maximo AI Service API/interface at the firewall or load balancer so only trusted management and integration networks can reach it (trade-off: breaks legitimate remote integrations and any cloud-hosted client traffic until those paths are re-established via VPN or allow-listing), and place the service behind an authenticating reverse proxy or API gateway with per-client request rate limits and request-size caps (trade-off: may throttle legitimate batch or high-volume AI inference workloads, and gateway rules will not understand proprietary payload semantics, so they must be tuned rather than simply enabled). Additionally, enable verbose request logging and alerting on malformed-request bursts or abnormal response latency and memory growth so operators can detect and restart the affected service quickly; note that restarts and rate limiting only reduce blast radius and do not remove the underlying input-validation defect.

Affected VersionsENISA

Maximo AI Service 9.1.0
Maximo AI Service 9.2.0

Affected Packages

euvd maximo_ai_service no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability is an input-validation failure (CWE-20) in IBM Maximo AI Service, the AI/ML component layered onto the Maximo asset management platform. Because the root cause class is improper validation of externally supplied input, the likely mechanism is that a malformed or specially crafted request reaching the AI Service API/interface is processed without adequate sanitization, exhausting resources or throwing the service into an unrecoverable state, which manifests purely as an availability loss (C:N/I:N/A:H) rather than data disclosure or tampering. The advisory does not name the specific vulnerable feature, endpoint, parameter, or input format that triggers the condition, and no CPE strings were supplied in the input data, so the affected technology can only be pinned to the Maximo AI Service 9.1.0 and 9.2.0 releases rather than a more granular component or library. Notification originated from IBM PSIRT (psirt@us.ibm.com), consistent with a vendor-internal discovery or coordinated disclosure rather than a third-party exploit report.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (us) PRIMARY 7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.5 HIGH

Remotely reachable unauthenticated input-validation DoS (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) with availability-only impact (A:H, C:N/I:N) and no scope change, matching a classic CWE-20 crash.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (us).

CVSS VectorVendor: us

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

IBM Maximo AI Service 9.1.0, and 9.2.0 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper input validation.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

IBM Maximo AI Service versions 9.1.0 and 9.2.0 carry a high-severity input validation flaw that a remote, unauthenticated attacker can use to disrupt the service, and IBM has not yet released a fix. Because the AI Service underpins asset-management and maintenance workflows, an outage can stall the operational teams that depend on it rather than exposing data. Leadership should treat this as an availability and exposure-management issue today: the practical risk tracks how widely the service interface is reachable, not any observed attack activity.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict network access to the IBM Maximo AI Service interface so it is not reachable from untrusted networks; segment and firewall affected 9.1.0 and 9.2.0 instances; front the service with an authenticated reverse proxy or API gateway; apply rate limiting and input filtering at the perimeter; monitor for service disruption or restart events; and maintain a rapid-deployment path for the vendor patch once IBM releases it.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 78% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
IBM Maximo is common enterprise asset management; AI Service is a specific module
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

38
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy