Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privileged remote access
-
ExploitSubmit crafted mistyped input
-
ExecutionBypass improper type validation
-
ImpactDisclose or tamper limited information
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Specified type validation
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to hold low-privileged access to the Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager (PR:L) and to reach it over the network (AV:N), then supply input of an unexpected/specified type that the application fails to validate (CWE-1287). Realistic exploitation is meaningfully limited by high attack complexity (AC:H) - the attacker must satisfy conditions outside their control (e.g., specific application state or timing) - and by the need for an existing authenticated/low-privilege foothold; it is not a remote-unauthenticated flaw against default configurations. Only instances running SCG Policy Manager versions prior to 5.34.00.16 are affected. |
| Impact | This is a genuinely low-priority vulnerability, and the signals are internally consistent rather than conflicting. The vendor CVSS 3.1 vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N, base 3.1) describes a network-reachable but hard-to-exploit flaw: it requires an attacker to already hold low-level privileges (PR:L), demands high attack complexity (AC:H, implying conditions outside the attacker's control such as timing, specific state, or race conditions), and yields only low-impact integrity effects (I:L) with no confidentiality (C:N) or availability (A:N) impact per the vendor scoring. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or public POC is present in the provided data, so there is no evidence of active or imminent exploitation - the appropriate status is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. One notable internal tension: the description explicitly cites 'Information exposure and Information tampering,' yet the vendor vector sets C:N (no confidentiality impact) while only recording I:L. 'Information exposure' normally maps to a confidentiality impact, so the vendor's C:N appears to understate the described effect - verify the confidentiality impact with Dell DSA-2026-385. Net: a high-CVSS scare this is not; it is a low-severity, high-complexity, privilege-requiring issue best handled via routine patching rather than emergency response. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already obtained a low-privileged authenticated foothold on, or network path to, the Dell SCG Policy Manager sends crafted input of an unexpected type to a function that fails to properly validate it (CWE-1287), causing the application to disclose or tamper with limited information. Because the CVSS vector specifies high attack complexity (AC:H), success depends on conditions the attacker cannot fully control, making reliable exploitation difficult. No public exploit code is identified at the time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 09, 2026
Authenticated low-privileged users with network reach to Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager instances running versions earlier than 5.34.00.16 can supply input of an unexpected type that the application accepts without validating it, resulting in limited information exposure and limited information tampering (assessed CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N). Realistic exploitation is constrained by high attack complexity, meaning the attacker must first satisfy conditions outside their control such as a specific application state or timing, and by the prerequisite of an existing low-privilege foothold, so this is not a remote unauthenticated flaw against default configurations. No public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation (CISA KEV) were identified at time of analysis, and the overall risk is genuinely low rather than merely rated low.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: upgrade SCG Policy Manager to version 5.34.00.16 or later, as documented in Dell advisory DSA-2026-385 (https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-ca/000503592/dsa-2026-385-security-update-for-dell-secure-connect-gateway-policy-manager-multiple-vulnerabilities). Because no public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation (CISA KEV) exist at time of analysis, and the defect requires an existing low-privilege authenticated session plus favourable conditions (AC:H), this upgrade can be scheduled on a normal maintenance cycle instead of an emergency change. If the update cannot be applied immediately, compensating controls should target the two prerequisites: restrict network access to the SCG Policy Manager administrative and API interfaces to trusted management subnets, jump hosts or VPN clients only - accepting that this may break remote-support workflows and unattended agent connectivity that rely on broader reachability - and audit, minimize and rotate low-privilege accounts and their role assignments on the appliance, since the flaw is only reachable from an authenticated foothold (PR:L) and least privilege reduces the data and records an attacker can reach. Where API access is exposed, front it with a proxy that enforces strict schema and type validation on request bodies, noting that such a proxy is a partial mitigation and will not cover non-HTTP paths into the product.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause class is CWE-1287, Improper Validation of Specified Type of Input: the Policy Manager component of Dell Secure Connect Gateway (formerly the Secure Remote Services / OpenManage Enterprise remote-support stack) accepts structured input through its management interfaces but does not verify that the supplied data matches the type the downstream logic expects before processing it. That class of defect typically surfaces as a type-confusion or type-coercion weakness in parsing/API handling (for example, an API field declared as one type being supplied as another and then coerced into application logic), which can leak partial backend data and let the attacker alter records or state within the bounds of their own low-privilege session. The CPE cpe:2.3:a:dell:secure_connect_gateway_(scg)_policy_manager:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* confirms the affected artifact is the SCG Policy Manager product rather than SCG core appliances or unrelated Dell management software, and the version gate in the advisory limits exposure to builds prior to 5.34.00.16. The assessed vector is network-reachable (AV:N) but high complexity (AC:H) and authenticated at the low-privilege level (PR:L) with no user interaction (UI:N), scope unchanged, and limited confidentiality and integrity impact; the vendor-published base vector agreed on network reach, high complexity and low privilege but listed C:N, while our assessment rates C:L, with both signals placing the outcome in the low-impact range rather than full compromise of the appliance.
Know when Secure Connect Gateway Scg Policy Manager gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Network-reachable (AV:N) but needs low privileges (PR:L) and high complexity (AC:H); description's 'information exposure' justifies C:L alongside I:L tampering, with no availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (dell).
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionNVD
Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Improper Validation of Specified Type of Input vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information exposure and Information tampering.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Weak authentication throttling in Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager allows unauthenticated remote attacke
Privilege escalation, filesystem access, and remote code execution in Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager a
Authorization bypass in Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager lets an authenticated, low-privileged user tamp
Improper X.509 certificate validation in Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager lets an unauthenticated attack
Privilege escalation in Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager allows an authenticated, network-reachable low-
Elevation of privilege in Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager lets an attacker who already holds a valid lo
Improper TLS certificate validation in Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager lets a man-in-the-middle who alr
Server-side request forgery in Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager allows a remote attacker who already hol
Protection mechanism bypass in Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager (versions below the vendor-fixed release
Cross-site request forgery in Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager prior to the vendor-fixed build allows a
Local privilege escalation in Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager versions prior to 5.34.00.16 lets a low-p
Unauthenticated remote attackers can reach a critical function in Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager witho
EUVD-2026-95566
GHSA-4wq5-53x9-qmrm
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Exploit-DB