Skip to main content

ArubaOS-S Switch CVE-2026-76741

| EUVDEUVD-2026-93975 MEDIUM
Stack-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-121)
2026-10-06 security-alert@hpe.com GHSA-8j79-v8wq-px92
6.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: hpe
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate to switch mgmt interface
  2. Exploit
    Send crafted input to vulnerable interface
  3. Execution
    Trigger buffer overflow in parser
  4. Impact
    Crash or hang device (DoS)

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Stack buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires valid authenticated access (PR:L) to the affected management interface of an AOS-S (ArubaOS-Switch) device; it is network-reachable (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L) and no user interaction (UI:N). The limiting factor is the authentication prerequisite - an attacker must hold working credentials on the switch, so unauthenticated/anonymous exploitation is not supported by the CVSS data. Impact is confined to denial-of-service (A:H only; C:N/I:N), meaning the realistic risk is device crash/disruption rather than compromise. The exact affected software versions and configuration preconditions are not specified in the available input and should be confirmed against HPE advisory hpesbnw05156en_us.

Impact

This is a moderate-priority, not a top-tier, issue. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H, base 6.5) is internally consistent with the description: a network-reachable, low-complexity flaw that requires authentication (PR:L) and yields only availability impact (DoS), with no confidentiality or integrity loss. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, POC, or SSVC decision data was provided, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active or automatable exploitation. The authentication requirement (PR:L) is the key mitigating signal - an attacker must already hold valid credentials on the switch management interface, which substantially narrows the realistic attacker population to insiders or those who have already obtained access. Because impact is limited to denial-of-service (no code execution or data exposure is claimed), this is better characterized as an availability/reliability risk for managed network infrastructure than as a critical breach vector. Prioritize patching on internet- or widely-exposed management planes, but it does not rise to emergency status absent exploitation evidence.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already possesses valid low-privileged credentials to an AOS-S switch management interface sends crafted input to the vulnerable interface, triggering a buffer overflow that crashes or hangs the device and disrupts network connectivity. No public exploit code is known, and the attacker gains no code execution or data access - only a denial-of-service outcome. Because authentication is required (PR:L), the scenario most realistically involves a malicious insider or an attacker leveraging previously compromised credentials.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 06, 2026

A buffer overflow in an affected interface of HPE Aruba AOS-S (ArubaOS-Switch) networking devices lets an authenticated remote attacker crash or destabilize the switch, producing a denial-of-service condition. Successful exploitation requires valid credentials on the device (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H, base score 6.5), so the realistic risk is management-plane disruption and loss of network availability rather than data compromise or code execution - the assessed impact is availability-only (A:H) with no confidentiality or integrity effect. There is no indication of confirmed active exploitation or of publicly available exploit code at the time of analysis, and the issue is rated moderate priority; specific affected firmware builds and configuration preconditions must be confirmed against HPE advisory hpesbnw05156en_us.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch version is identified in the available data, so the primary action is to open HPE advisory hpesbnw05156en_us (https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=hpesbnw05156en_us&docLocale=en_US) and apply the fixed AOS-S firmware build it designates for each affected switch model; if the advisory does not yet list a fix, track it and schedule an out-of-band firmware update. Until then, apply compensating controls targeted at the authenticated network-facing attack path: restrict reachability of the switch's management and protocol interfaces to a dedicated out-of-band management VLAN with explicit ACLs, so only trusted administrative subnets can initiate sessions (trade-off: remote management from other segments breaks and administrators must stage changes from the privileged network); disable unused remote management services such as Telnet, the web UI, and SNMP where they are not required, leaving only SSH with strong credentials (trade-off: reduces monitoring or tooling integration that depends on those protocols); enforce least-privilege, uniquely named administrative accounts and rotate credentials, since exploitation requires valid credentials (trade-off: operational overhead, but it removes shared-account access paths). Because the impact is availability-only, ensure switch configuration backups and a tested recovery/restart procedure are in place so a crash causes minimal outage, and monitor for unexpected reboots or interface process restarts as a possible indicator of exploitation attempts.

Affected VersionsENISA

AOS-Switch (AOS-S) 16.11.0000 ≤16.11.0031

Affected Packages

euvd aos_switch_aos_s no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

AOS-S is the operating system family for HPE Aruba's wired switching portfolio (ArubaOS-Switch), whose management and protocol-facing interfaces are reachable over the network. The reported defect class is a buffer overflow in one of those interfaces: input that exceeds the size expected by the processing routine is not adequately bounds-checked, corrupting adjacent memory and causing the affected process - or the device - to fault. The vulnerability identifier does not carry an assigned CWE in the supplied data, but the vendor tag 'Buffer Overflow' maps to the classic memory-corruption family (CWE-120/121/122 style out-of-bounds or unchecked-copy conditions). The CVSS vector confirms the exploitation profile: network-reachable (AV:N), low complexity (AC:L), no user interaction (UI:N), and privileged (PR:L) - meaning the attacker must already hold working credentials to reach the vulnerable code path, which is why unauthenticated or anonymous exploitation is not supported by the data. Impact is scoped unchanged (S:U) and limited to availability, pointing to a crash/restart denial-of-service rather than memory-corruption-driven code execution.

Know when Aruba gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (hpe) PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Authenticated remote attacker (PR:L, AV:N) exploits a low-complexity buffer overflow causing only denial-of-service, so C:N/I:N/A:H with unchanged scope.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (hpe).

CVSS VectorVendor: hpe

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the affected interface of AOS-S. Successful exploitation could allow an authenticated remote attacker to cause a denial-of-service condition on the affected system.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 69% exploitable
Prevalence
High
AOS-S (ArubaOS-Switch) runs on widely-deployed HPE/Aruba enterprise switches
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A stack-based buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a buffer located on the stack than it was allocated to hold.

More in Aruba

View all
CVE-2024-26304 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 01

There is a buffer overflow vulnerability in the underlying L2/L3 Management service that could lead to unauthenticated r

CVE-2024-26305 CRITICAL
9.8 May 01

There is a buffer overflow vulnerability in the underlying Utility daemon that could lead to unauthenticated remote code

CVE-2021-25162 HIGH POC
8.1 Mar 30

A remote execution of arbitrary commands vulnerability was discovered in some Aruba Instant Access Point (IAP) products

CVE-2026-76742 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 06

Unauthenticated remote attackers can bypass authentication in the web management interface of HPE AOS-S (ArubaOS-Switch)

CVE-2015-4650 CRITICAL
9.8 Oct 16

Aruba Networks ClearPass Policy Manager before 6.4.7 and 6.5.x before 6.5.2 allows remote attackers to gain shell access

CVE-2014-6626 CRITICAL
10.0 Nov 19

Aruba Networks ClearPass before 6.3.6 and 6.4.x before 6.4.1 does not properly restrict access to unspecified administra

CVE-2015-1389 MEDIUM POC
4.3 May 28

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Aruba Networks ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) before 6.4.5 allows remote at

CVE-2014-5342 CRITICAL
10.0 Nov 19

Aruba Networks ClearPass before 6.3.5 and 6.4.x before 6.4.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via u

CVE-2021-25159 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Mar 30

A remote arbitrary file modification vulnerability was discovered in some Aruba Instant Access Point (IAP) products in v

CVE-2021-25155 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Mar 30

A remote arbitrary file modification vulnerability was discovered in some Aruba Instant Access Point (IAP) products in v

CVE-2026-76747 CRITICAL
9.1 Oct 06

Unauthenticated remote attackers can trigger buffer overflows in an interface of HPE Aruba AOS-S (ArubaOS-Switch) that i

CVE-2022-37897 CRITICAL
9.8 Dec 12

There is a command injection vulnerability that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy