Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach APIC management interface
-
ExploitSend crafted malicious input
-
ExecutionExploit improper neutralization (CWE-707)
-
ImpactCompromise controller confidentiality/integrity/availability
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Improper neutralization
|
| Exploitation Conditions | The attacker needs network reachability to the Cisco APIC (Application Policy Infrastructure Controller) - the fabric controller for Cisco ACI data-center deployments - and per the CVSS vector no authentication (PR:N) or user interaction (UI:N) is required. The description provides no specific feature, protocol, or non-default configuration prerequisite; it only states the issues are improper-neutralization (CWE-707) flaws found in internal review, so the exact triggering vector is not disclosed in the available data. Primary limiting factor is deployment exposure: APIC management/controller interfaces are typically on isolated or restricted out-of-band management networks, so real-world reachability for an unauthenticated remote attacker is usually constrained to insiders or attackers who have already pivoted into the management segment, substantially narrowing exploitability despite the AV:N rating. |
| Impact | The input assigns a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), indicating a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated flaw with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact - on paper this is a top-tier priority. However, every corroborating exploitation signal is absent or weak: no EPSS score is provided, the CVE is NOT in CISA KEV, and no public proof-of-concept is referenced, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. The vulnerability was internally discovered by Cisco's own APIC engineering team during a proactive security review rather than found through observed attacks, which strongly suggests no active exploitation is occurring and reduces real-world urgency relative to the raw score. No SSVC decision data (exploitation/automatable/technical-impact) was supplied. A notable tension exists between the metadata tag 'Information Disclosure' and both the CVSS impact triad (C:H/I:H/A:H implies far more than disclosure) and CWE-707 (improper neutralization, an injection-class pillar) - verify the actual impact with Cisco, as the tag appears narrower than the assessed scope. Also note CVE-2026-76499 is described as an umbrella for MULTIPLE internally discovered issues, so the single 9.8 vector may represent the worst-case component rather than every bundled flaw. Net assessment: high theoretical severity on a sensitive management controller, but currently low observed-exploitation risk given internal discovery and no KEV/POC/EPSS evidence - patch on a prioritized-but-not-emergency timeline unless the APIC is internet- or untrusted-network-exposed. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with network access to the APIC management interface sends crafted input that exploits an improper-neutralization (CWE-707) flaw, requiring no authentication or user interaction per the CVSS vector (AV:N/PR:N/UI:N). Successful exploitation could compromise the fabric controller's data confidentiality and integrity and disrupt availability. No public exploit code is known, and the issues were found through Cisco's internal review rather than observed in the wild. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 07, 2026
Improper neutralization flaws in Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC), the software controller for Cisco ACI data-center fabrics, allow unauthenticated network-reachable attackers to achieve full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact - the input assigns CVSS 3.1 base 9.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). The issues were found during Cisco's own internal hardening review and are bundled as a single CVE covering multiple CWE-707 (Improper Neutralization) weaknesses rather than one disclosed trigger path; no specific protocol, endpoint, or non-default configuration prerequisite is documented. No public exploit code and confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis, and no EPSS score was supplied. Practically, exploitability hinges on reachability of APIC management/controller interfaces, which are normally confined to isolated out-of-band management networks, so real-world exposure is largely limited to insiders or attackers who have already pivoted into the management segment. Patches are available per the Cisco advisory cisco-sa-hardening-apic-UOXWtfh; because the reference is a hardening release rather than a single tagged fix, an exact fixed version string was not provided in the input data.
RemediationAI
Patch available per vendor advisory: Cisco addressed these internally discovered improper-neutralization issues through a hardening software release, and the authoritative list of fixed APIC releases plus upgrade guidance is in the Cisco advisory cisco-sa-hardening-apic-UOXWtfh (https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-hardening-apic-UOXWtfh) - the input does not supply an exact fix version string, so consult that advisory rather than assuming a release number. In the interim, the highest-value compensating control is to enforce the deployment assumption the risk assessment relies on: keep APIC management interfaces off any untrusted network, reachable only from a dedicated out-of-band management segment with strict ACLs, since unauthenticated network reachability (PR:N/AV:N) is the precondition for this flaw - the trade-off is that any host on that management segment, including a compromised jump box, retains full attack potential. Do not expose the APIC GUI, REST API, or inter-controller communication ports to the internet or to user/tenant networks; verify with an external scan that no APIC management listener is reachable from outside the management VLAN. Tighten RBAC and audit APIC administrative accounts, and alert on anomalous authenticated or unauthenticated requests to APIC endpoints that could indicate exploitation attempts. Monitor Cisco's advisory page for revision, since internally discovered bundled CVEs are sometimes expanded with additional affected releases or updated fixed-version tables after initial publication.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
CWE-707 is a CWE Pillar for Improper Neutralization - the parent class that encompasses injection-family weaknesses such as command injection, SQL injection, cross-site scripting, path traversal, and argument/log injection, where the root cause is failure to correctly encode, escape, quote, or otherwise neutralize special elements before they are interpreted by a downstream component. Because Cisco grouped multiple internally discovered issues under this one CVE rather than disclosing individual defect classes, the available data does not identify which protocol, API endpoint, CLI path, or web interface is the triggering vector, nor whether the flaw sits in the APIC management GUI, REST API, internal service-to-service messaging, or configuration parsing. The CVSS vector confirms a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated, no-user-interaction attack against an unchanged scope, producing high impact across all three CIA properties, which is consistent with an injection-class defect reaching a privileged internal component. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:cisco:cisco_application_policy_infrastructure_controller_(apic):*:*:*:*:*:*:* carries a wildcard version, indicating the advisory is not scoped to a single release line; the wildcard should be treated as a data-quality limitation, not as confirmation that literally every historical APIC build is affected. Note a signal discrepancy worth tracking: the source tags label this as 'Information Disclosure', yet the assessed vector claims high integrity and availability impact as well, so the weakness may leak sensitive data while also permitting state modification or denial of the controller.
Know when Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller Apic gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Vendor-assigned AV:N/PR:N retained for a network-facing controller, but confidence is low because the description discloses no technical detail; impact triad accepted as full compromise.
Primary rating from Vendor (cisco).
CVSS VectorVendor: cisco
DescriptionCVE.org
As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in software hardening releases that address multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities.
The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-76499 are related to improper neutralization issues that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) Pillar CWE-707.
Executive ViewAI
Cisco's Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC), the management brain for Cisco ACI data-center network fabrics, carries a critical unauthenticated flaw (CVE-2026-76499, CVSS 9.8) that could let an attacker with network reach to the controller fully compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the fabric it governs. Because APIC defines the network segmentation and policy that everything in the ACI-managed data center depends on, a successful compromise could expose or disrupt a broad set of production workloads and business services well beyond the network team. No vendor patch is available at time of analysis, so leadership should treat this as a near-term risk-management decision centered on access control and monitoring rather than a routine patch cycle.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict APIC management and controller interfaces to an isolated out-of-band management network with deny-by-default firewall rules; enforce MFA and least-privilege administrative roles on APIC; remove or disable unused administrative and service accounts; enable and centrally monitor APIC audit, authentication, and configuration-change logging with alerting; and apply available Cisco hardening guidance and ACI-side access controls until a fixed release is available.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Unauthenticated remote attackers who can reach the management/API plane of the Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure C
Unauthenticated remote access-control bypass in Cisco APIC gives network-reachable attackers full compromise of confiden
OS command injection in the web-based management API of Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) allows
Sensitive-file disclosure in the export policies feature of Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) al
EUVD-2026-94471
GHSA-4mrw-vr59-vgf2
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB