Skip to main content

phpMyFAQ CVE-2026-76214

| EUVDEUVD-2026-62455 CRITICAL
Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay (CWE-294)
2026-08-19 VulnCheck GHSA-wg4g-rgc9-r6gj
9.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulnCheck
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain network vantage on victim traffic
  2. Delivery
    Capture successful WebAuthn assertion
  3. Exploit
    Replay assertion to login endpoint
  4. Execution
    Null-guard skips anti-replay check
  5. Persist
    Authenticate as victim user
  6. Impact
    Take over account/data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Replay attack prevention
Exploitation Conditions

The target deployment must have WebAuthn/passkey authentication enabled and actively used by at least one account (versions <= 4.1.5). The attacker must first capture a complete, successful WebAuthn assertion for the victim - this is the concrete, limiting prerequisite reflected in AC:H and AT:P, and normally requires a privileged network vantage point (MITM, malicious proxy, or access to traffic/logs) since the assertion transits TLS. Once a valid assertion is captured, no further conditions apply: no hardware key, no user interaction, and no authentication of the attacker are needed to replay it indefinitely. Deployments that do not use WebAuthn logins are not exploitable via this flaw.

Impact

The impact ceiling is high - full account takeover with high confidentiality and integrity impact (VC:H/VI:H) and no privileges or user interaction required (PR:N/UI:N) - but the practical barrier is real: the CVSS 4.0 vector carries AC:H and AT:P, reflecting that the attacker must first obtain a genuine successful WebAuthn assertion for the target, which normally travels over TLS. That capture prerequisite, not a trivial network request, is what gates this bug; once an assertion is obtained (via interception, a compromised proxy/reverse proxy, logged traffic, or a malicious network position), replay is unlimited and trivial. There is no KEV listing and no POC has surfaced, and EPSS data was not provided, so this reads as a serious-but-not-yet-mass-exploited issue. Given that patching is a simple upgrade, any operator using WebAuthn logins - even a mid-sized municipal IT team in rybnik should treat this as urgent - should upgrade promptly rather than wait for exploitation signals. Note the input 'Denial Of Service' tag appears mislabeled; this is an authentication bypass, not a DoS.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker positioned to observe or record a victim's traffic (for example via a malicious or misconfigured reverse proxy, captured logs, or a network foothold) collects one successful WebAuthn login assertion for an administrator. Because phpMyFAQ never persists and consumes the challenge, the attacker resubmits that same assertion to the login endpoint and is authenticated as the victim, repeatedly, without the hardware key or any user interaction. No public POC is currently identified, but the mechanism is fully described in the vendor advisory.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 19, 2026

Authentication bypass via WebAuthn assertion replay in phpMyFAQ affects all versions up to and including 4.1.5, fixed in 4.1.7. Because prepareForLogin generates a login challenge but neither WebAuthn controller writes the mutated key object back to the database, the anti-replay check is short-circuited by its own null guard, so an attacker who captures one successful WebAuthn assertion can resubmit it indefinitely to log in as that user with no hardware key or user interaction. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV, but the root cause is well documented in the vendor advisory.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: upgrade to phpMyFAQ 4.1.7 or later, which persists the WebAuthn challenge so the single-use anti-replay comparison actually executes; this is the primary and complete fix, per advisory GHSA-f534-wv9g-wx2w (https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/security/advisories/GHSA-f534-wv9g-wx2w). If you cannot upgrade immediately, reduce exposure by temporarily disabling WebAuthn/passkey login and falling back to password plus a separately-validated second factor, accepting the usability loss of removing hardware-key auth; ensure the application is only reachable over strict TLS (HSTS, no downgrade) and audit any reverse proxies or TLS-terminating middleware that could log or expose assertion payloads, since captured assertions are the exploitation prerequisite. Invalidate existing sessions after patching in case replayed logins already occurred.

Affected VersionsENISA

phpMyFAQ 0 <4.1.7

Affected Packages

euvd phpmyfaq fix: 4.1.7

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw lives in phpMyFAQ's WebAuthn (FIDO2/passkey) login flow. WebAuthn normally prevents replay by binding each authentication to a fresh server-generated random challenge that must be validated exactly once and then invalidated. Here, prepareForLogin creates and mutates the credential/challenge object in memory, but the controllers never persist that mutation, so on the next request the stored challenge is null. The verification code guards its anti-replay comparison behind a null check, so a null stored challenge causes the comparison to be skipped entirely rather than failing closed. This is a textbook CWE-294 (Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay) caused by a broken single-use-nonce invariant. The affected component is the open-source PHP FAQ application identified by cpe:2.3:a:thorsten:phpmyfaq (all versions through 4.1.5).

Know when Phpmyfaq gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulnCheck) PRIMARY 9.1 CRITICAL
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 7.4 HIGH

Network-reachable login endpoint (AV:N) but exploitation requires first capturing a valid assertion (AC:H); no attacker auth or victim interaction (PR:N/UI:N); replay yields full account takeover (C:H/I:H), no availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Attack Requirements
Present
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Aug 19, 2026 - 15:17 EUVD
CVE Published
Aug 19, 2026 - 14:01 cve.org
CRITICAL 9.1

DescriptionCVE.org

phpMyFAQ before 4.1.7 (affected versions <= 4.1.5) fails to persist the WebAuthn login challenge generated by prepareForLogin, because neither WebAuthn controller saves the mutated key objects back to the database. At login the anti-replay comparison is skipped by its own null guard, allowing an attacker who captures a successful WebAuthn assertion to replay it indefinitely and authenticate as the user without any interaction or hardware key.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

phpMyFAQ versions up to 4.1.5 contain a critical authentication bypass vulnerability that allows attackers who capture a single WebAuthn login assertion to replay it indefinitely and gain unauthorized access to any affected user account without hardware key or additional verification. If phpMyFAQ is deployed in your organization, this vulnerability could expose all user accounts to unauthorized access and potential data compromise.

Business Impact: Severe
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 78% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche self-hosted open-source FAQ app, limited enterprise footprint
Data Quality
7 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Very High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

46
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +46
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2025-59943 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 03

Duplicate-email registration handling in phpMyFAQ 4.0.7 through 4.0.13 (and 4.0-nightly-2025-10-03 and earlier) lets una

CVE-2023-5865 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 31

Insufficient Session Expiration in GitHub repository thorsten/phpmyfaq prior to 3.2.2. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8

CVE-2023-1886 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 05

Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay in GitHub repository thorsten/phpmyfaq prior to 3.1.12. Rated critical severity

CVE-2023-1753 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Mar 31

Weak Password Requirements in GitHub repository thorsten/phpmyfaq prior to 3.1.12. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), t

CVE-2022-3754 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 29

Weak Password Requirements in GitHub repository thorsten/phpmyfaq prior to 3.1.8. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), th

CVE-2026-46364 CRITICAL POC
9.3 May 15

Unauthenticated SQL injection in phpMyFAQ before 4.1.2 allows remote attackers to extract credentials, admin tokens, and

CVE-2017-15730 HIGH POC
8.8 Oct 22

In phpMyFAQ before 2.9.9, there is Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in admin/stat.ratings.php. Rated high severity (CVS

CVE-2017-15808 HIGH POC
8.8 Oct 23

In phpMyFaq before 2.9.9, there is CSRF in admin/ajax.config.php. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is

CVE-2017-15735 HIGH POC
8.8 Oct 22

In phpMyFAQ before 2.9.9, there is Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) for modifying a glossary. Rated high severity (CVSS

CVE-2017-15734 HIGH POC
8.8 Oct 22

In phpMyFAQ before 2.9.9, there is Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in admin/stat.main.php. Rated high severity (CVSS 8

CVE-2024-28107 HIGH POC
8.8 Mar 25

phpMyFAQ is an open source FAQ web application for PHP 8.1+ and MySQL, PostgreSQL and other databases. Rated high severi

CVE-2024-27299 HIGH POC
8.8 Mar 25

phpMyFAQ is an open source FAQ web application for PHP 8.1+ and MySQL, PostgreSQL and other databases. Rated high severi

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy