Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain valid credentials for any protected inets directory
-
DeliveryEnumerate additional directory-protected paths on same server
-
ExploitCraft HTTP Basic Auth request targeting restricted directory
-
Executionmod_auth queries global dets/mnesia namespace without path scope
-
PersistServer validates credentials and returns 200
-
ImpactExfiltrate content from unauthorized directory
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization logic validation
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Three simultaneous conditions must hold for exploitation. First, the inets httpd server must have mod_auth configured with either a dets or mnesia authentication backend - plain-text and in-memory ETS backends are not affected by the namespace collapse. Second, the server configuration must define at least two distinct directory protection blocks targeting different paths, creating the multi-block scenario where the namespace is shared. Third, the attacker must already possess valid credentials for at least one of the protected directories on that server instance, reflecting the PR:L requirement in the CVSS vector. Exploitation is bounded to confidentiality: an attacker gains unauthorized read access to content in directories they should not reach but cannot modify data or disrupt service. Users with no credentials on the server at all cannot exploit this vulnerability. |
| Impact | The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L) yields a score of 6.0, accurately reflecting that network exploitation is mechanically simple but gated behind two prerequisites: a specific server configuration and possession of existing credentials. The AT:P (attack requirements present) flag is the key moderating signal - deployments with only one directory block or using plain-text/ETS backends are entirely unaffected. EPSS data is absent from the provided intelligence, limiting probabilistic exploitation forecasting. No CISA KEV listing and no public exploit code exist at time of analysis, keeping this out of the immediate triage tier despite the high confidentiality impact. Real-world risk scales directly with how much trust separation inets directory blocks are expected to enforce: even a mid-sized municipal IT team in sopot running inets-based internal administrative portals should treat patching as urgent if directory-level user segregation is a security control rather than mere convenience. The absence of integrity and availability impact (VI:N, VA:N) bounds the worst case to unauthorized read access, but for sensitive data partitioned by directory this remains a serious control failure. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who holds valid credentials for a low-sensitivity directory - for example, a read-only documentation area - submits an HTTP Basic Authentication request using those credentials against a higher-privilege directory such as an admin configuration endpoint on the same inets server instance. Because mod_auth queries the dets store without a directory-path qualifier, the user is found in the global namespace and authentication succeeds, returning a 200 response with the restricted content. No public exploit code exists at time of analysis, so exploitation requires manual construction of the HTTP request. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 01, 2026
Directory namespace isolation failure in Erlang/OTP's inets httpd mod_auth module allows an authenticated low-privilege user to bypass access controls on protected directories they were never granted access to. Servers using dets or mnesia persistence backends with multiple directory configuration blocks across OTP 17.x through 29.x are affected, with patched releases available for all three supported branches. No active exploitation has been confirmed and no public exploit code exists at time of analysis, but the horizontal privilege escalation within a running inets instance poses a meaningful risk to any deployment using per-directory access tiering.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to OTP 27.3.4.17 (inets 9.3.2.7), OTP 28.5.0.6 (inets 9.6.2.3), or OTP 29.0.6 (inets 9.7.2) as appropriate for the deployed release line, per the advisory at https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-c3cq-q8x6-547g. Three separate patch commits address the three branches: 6982e381, c5ccec8ed2, and 6101cb74ff. If an immediate upgrade is not feasible, a targeted workaround is to collapse all protected paths into a single directory configuration block and replicate any access distinctions at the application layer - this eliminates the multi-block namespace collapse entirely, though it sacrifices mod_auth's native per-directory granularity. Alternatively, switching from dets or mnesia backends to the plain-text auth backend avoids the vulnerable code path; this trade-off sacrifices persistence and concurrent-access safety but is viable for low-traffic internal servers. Servers that use only a single protected directory block, or that use plain-text or ETS authentication backends, require no immediate action.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The inets application ships as part of the Erlang/OTP standard library and provides a built-in HTTP server. Its mod_auth module implements HTTP Basic Authentication for directory-scoped access control, supporting multiple backend storage engines: plain-text, ETS (in-memory), dets (disk-based ETS), and Mnesia (OTP's distributed database). The defect, classified as CWE-863 (Incorrect Authorization), arises because check_password/4 in mod_auth.erl and the api_call function in mod_auth_server.erl passed DirData proplists to backend lookup functions without including the {path, Dir} key. As a result, dets and mnesia backends queried a global user/group namespace rather than a per-directory-scoped store. The fix (commits 6982e38, c5ccec8e, 6101cb74) injects {path, Dir} into DirData before all backend calls, restoring isolation. CPE cpe:2.3:a:erlang:otp captures all affected OTP versions. Only the dets and mnesia backends are affected; plain-text and ETS backends do not exhibit this namespace collapse.
Know when Otp gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Requires existing low-privilege credentials (PR:L) and a non-default multi-directory dets/mnesia configuration (AC:H); no integrity or availability impact applies.
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Primary rating from Vendor (EEF).
CVSS VectorVendor: EEF
DescriptionCVE.org
The mod_auth module in OTP's inets httpd server, when configured with dets or mnesia authentication backends and multiple directory configuration blocks, collapses all directory blocks into a single shared user/group namespace. A user added to one protected directory is accepted as valid for all other protected directories on the same server instance.
This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.17, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.6, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.6, corresponding to inets from 5.10 before 9.3.2.7, from 9.4 before 9.6.2.3, and from 9.7 before 9.7.2. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to inets before 5.10, is affected is unknown.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Incorrect access control in Yubico OTP functionality of the YubiKey hardware tokens along with the Yubico OTP validation
Erlang/OTP's ssl application in affected releases (OTP 22.2 through the fixed 27.3.4.18, 28.5.0.7 and 29.1.1) will compl
An on-path attacker can force an Erlang/OTP TLS 1.2 or DTLS client to accept an anonymous cipher suite not offered by th
Denial of service in Erlang/OTP erts (inet_drv SCTP handler) lets unauthenticated remote attackers crash the BEAM VM by
Unauthenticated denial of service in Erlang/OTP's inets httpd allows any remote attacker to exhaust a server's process p
Remote denial of service in Erlang/OTP's ssl application (dtls_packet_demux module) lets an unauthenticated attacker cra
Erlang/OTP's inets HTTP server (httpd) is vulnerable to a slow-body resource exhaustion attack exploitable by unauthenti
Uncontrolled recursion in the Erlang/OTP ssl application when processing a crafted TLS/DTLS certificate chain allows rem
Erlang/OTP's inets HTTP server (httpd) fails to enforce an administrator-configured request body-size limit when process
Remote code execution and denial of service are possible against Erlang/OTP nodes that run the megaco application with t
Remote unauthenticated attackers can exploit Erlang/OTP's built-in inets HTTP server across OTP versions 22.2 through 29
HTTP request smuggling in Erlang/OTP's built-in inets httpd server allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arb
Same weakness CWE-863 – Incorrect Authorization
View allSame technique Authentication Bypass
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Moderate| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.1 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Enterprise Storage 7 | Affected |
| SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2-BCL | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3-BCL | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.2 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.3 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.4 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.5 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
EUVD-2026-69240
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
GitHub
VulDB
Exploit-DB