Skip to main content

Dbit T-CPE301K CVE-2026-7192

| EUVDEUVD-2026-88758 CRITICAL
Stack-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-121)
2026-09-29 INCIBE GHSA-r22p-w9qg-87mw
9.3
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: INCIBE
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate to router web UI
  2. Exploit
    Send POST to /js/common/do_cmd.js with over-long parameter
  3. Execution
    Overflow stack buffer overwriting PC/RA
  4. Impact
    Service crash and device reboot (DoS)

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Stack buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Requires network reachability to the T-CPE301K web management interface and, per the description, an authenticated session; the attacker then sends an HTTP POST to the specific endpoint /js/common/do_cmd.js with an excessively long parameter. Exploitation is limited by the authentication requirement (contradicting the PR:N in the scored vector) and by the device's small deployment footprint; the confirmed outcome is DoS/reboot, with arbitrary code execution only a theoretical possibility implied by PC/RA register overwrite.

Impact

The vendor/INCIBE-supplied CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H = 9.3 Critical) rates this as a remote, unauthenticated, full-CIA-impact flaw, but two internal contradictions weaken that headline number. First, the description explicitly says an 'authenticated attacker' is required, which conflicts with the PR:N (no privileges) in the scored vector - these cannot both be true, so the true privilege requirement should be treated as PR:L pending vendor confirmation. Second, the described real-world impact is limited to denial of service and a system reboot (an availability event), which does not match the VC:H/VI:H (full confidentiality and integrity) claimed in the vector; the VC:H/VI:H appears to be an inference from the fact that the overflow overwrites the PC and RA registers (a classic precursor to arbitrary code execution), but no code execution is actually demonstrated or claimed. There is no EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC referenced - only an INCIBE advisory with a vendor patch. Net assessment: this is a genuine, patchable stack overflow in a network-facing router web endpoint, but the effective risk is a post-authentication DoS/reboot rather than the unauthenticated RCE the 9.3 implies. Combined with a small real-world deployment footprint, this is lower real priority than the Critical rating suggests, though the register-overwrite behavior means an RCE upgrade cannot be fully ruled out.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has authenticated to the T-CPE301K router's web management interface sends a crafted HTTP POST to /js/common/do_cmd.js containing an over-length parameter, overflowing a stack buffer and overwriting the PC and RA registers. This crashes the responsible service and forces a device reboot, dropping the router's connectivity; no public exploit code is currently referenced, though the register overwrite hints at potential for further exploitation.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 29, 2026

A stack-based buffer overflow in the web management interface of the Shenzhen Dbit T-CPE301K 4G mini WiFi router allows an attacker who already holds a session on the device to crash the router and force a reboot by sending an HTTP POST to /js/common/do_cmd.js with an excessively long parameter. The published CVSS 4.0 score of 9.3 treats this as remote, unauthenticated, and full impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability, but our independent assessment scores it under CVSS 3.1 as AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H, i.e. an authenticated, availability-only denial-of-service, because exploitation requires network reachability to the management interface plus a valid session on the endpoint, and the confirmed outcome is a crash and restart rather than code execution. There is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit code identified at time of analysis, and the practical risk is further limited by the small deployment footprint of this consumer/SOHO-class router; a vendor patch is available per the INCIBE advisory.

RemediationAI

Patch status per the supplied data is "Vendor-released patch: available from vendor," with no exact firmware version string enumerated in the CPE or reference metadata; the primary action is therefore to obtain the current fixed firmware for the T-CPE301K from Shenzhen Dbit or the INCIBE advisory notice at https://www.incibe.es/en/incibe-cert/notices/aviso/multiple-vulnerabilities-t-cpe301k-4g-mini-wifi-router-shenzhen-dbit and flash the device, confirming the exact build number with the vendor rather than assuming the latest posted image is patched. Because exploitation requires a valid session (PR:L) on the management UI, the most effective short-term compensating control is to remove the attack surface: disable WAN-side/remote administration so the web interface, including /js/common/do_cmd.js, is reachable only from a trusted management VLAN or directly attached host, accepting the trade-off that remote administration must go through a VPN or SSH tunnel instead. Additionally, rotate and strengthen the admin credentials (default-credential reuse is common on SOHO routers and would collapse the authentication barrier entirely), restrict which accounts can reach the management interface, and enable logging/alerting on unexpected reboots as a detection signal, understanding that reboots can have benign causes and this is a noisy indicator. If the device cannot be patched or segmented and is not business-critical, replacing it with a supported router is the most reliable fix, since continued exposure leaves an authenticated attacker, or anyone who guesses or reuses credentials, able to repeatedly force outages. There is no vendor-supplied workaround documented beyond patching, so any input-filtering or WAF-style measure would have to be deployed upstream and tuned to the specific POST parameter, which is brittle and not a substitute for firmware remediation.

Affected VersionsENISA

T-CPE301K 4G Mini WiFi Router 0 <29/09/2026

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is a classic CWE-121 stack-based buffer overflow in the embedded HTTP service that exposes the T-CPE301K's management UI. The endpoint /js/common/do_cmd.js passes an attacker-supplied parameter into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking; an oversized value overflows adjacent stack memory and overwrites the saved return address (RA) and program counter (PC) values, so the device takes an exception, the web/main process dies, and the router reboots. Because the overwrite lands on control-flow data, arbitrary code execution is theoretically possible on the underlying embedded firmware, but the only confirmed and demonstrated impact in the advisory is denial of service via reboot, and no working RCE chain has been published. The CPE record cpe:2.3:a:shenzhen_dbit_network_equipment:t-cpe301k_4g_mini_wifi_router:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* carries a wildcard version, indicating the vendor did not enumerate a fixed firmware build in the CPE feed, so all firmware versions of the product should be treated as potentially affected until the vendor's advisory or a subsequent firmware release states otherwise. The key nuance is that the scored CVSS 4.0 vector claims PR:N (no privileges required), which conflicts with the description's explicit requirement for an authenticated attacker and with our assessed PR:L; the authentication gate is what keeps this from being a pre-auth remote takeover of every exposed device.

Know when T Cpe301K 4G Mini Wifi Router gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (INCIBE) PRIMARY 9.3 CRITICAL
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Description requires an authenticated session (PR:L) over the network web UI (AV:N/AC:L), and the demonstrated impact is DoS/reboot only, so A:H with C:N/I:N.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (INCIBE).

CVSS VectorVendor: INCIBE

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the Dbit T-CPE301K 4G WiFi minirouter allows an authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) and a system reboot via a manipulated HTTP POST request directed at the endpoint ‘/js/common/do_cmd.js’ endpoint containing an excessively long parameter, which overwrites the PC and RA registers.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

The Shenzhen Dbit T-CPE301K 4G mini WiFi router is affected by CVE-2026-7192, a critical-severity stack-based buffer overflow that can force an authenticated reboot through the web management interface. Exploitation requires network reachability to the management interface and a valid session, and the confirmed impact is availability-only denial of service rather than data compromise or code execution. There is no CISA KEV listing, no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and patch available per vendor advisory, so leadership should prioritize patching any deployed units, especially those with exposed management interfaces.

Business Impact: Low
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 84% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche Shenzhen Dbit 4G mini WiFi router, no broad enterprise footprint
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
Low
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

46
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +46
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A stack-based buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a buffer located on the stack than it was allocated to hold.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy