Skip to main content

Windows Security Center CVE-2026-71347

| EUVDEUVD-2026-99573 MEDIUM
Race Condition (CWE-362)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-gvrf-mf7p-mr6p
6.4
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain privileged local foothold
  2. Delivery
    Target Security Center shared resource
  3. Exploit
    Trigger timing-sensitive race condition
  4. Execution
    Corrupt shared state concurrently
  5. Impact
    Elevate to higher privilege

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Concurrency control, locking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already be an authorized, high-privilege local user (PR:H) with the ability to execute code on the affected Windows 11 host and to interact concurrently with the Windows Security Center's shared resource. Success further depends on winning a non-deterministic timing window inherent to the race condition (AC:H), meaning repeated attempts are typically needed and reliable single-shot exploitation is unlikely. No remote vector and no user interaction are involved; limiting factors are the pre-existing privilege requirement, the local-only attack surface, and the timing sensitivity, all of which reduce realistic risk below what the 'total' technical impact alone would suggest.

Impact

This is a moderate-priority, local privilege-escalation issue that most signals agree is NOT a widespread-exploitation emergency despite affecting a ubiquitous platform. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N, base 6.4) requires the attacker to already be authenticated with high privileges on the machine and to win a timing-sensitive race (AC:H), which materially constrains reliable exploitation. CISA's SSVC framework reinforces this: Exploitation=none (no observed activity) and Automatable=no (the race cannot be reliably scripted at scale), even though Technical Impact=total. No KEV listing and no public POC were identified, so there is currently no evidence of in-the-wild use. The one tension worth noting is the 'Information Disclosure' tag versus the description, which describes privilege elevation (CWE-362 race condition) rather than disclosure - the EoP framing and C:H/I:H/A:H impacts should be treated as authoritative over that tag. Net: a legitimate patch-in-normal-cycle item, elevated only because the affected product is Windows, but not an out-of-band drop-everything vulnerability given the high-privilege precondition, high attack complexity, and absence of exploitation signals.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already has a privileged (but not SYSTEM-level) foothold on a Windows 11 host - for example a compromised service account or a local admin-adjacent process - repeatedly triggers a timing-sensitive operation in the Windows Security Center to win a race condition and corrupt shared state, thereby elevating to a higher privilege level. Because AC:H and PR:H apply, exploitation requires local access, existing privileges, and multiple timing attempts rather than a single deterministic action. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

A race condition (CWE-362) in the Windows Security Center component of Windows 11 allows an attacker who already holds high privileges on the host to escalate privileges locally, affecting Windows 11 24H2 (builds below 10.0.26100.9445), 25H2 (below 10.0.26200.9445), and 26H1 (below 10.0.28000.2954). The attack is local-only and requires PR:H - the adversary must already be an authorized, high-privilege local user able to execute code and interact concurrently with the shared resource - and AC:H means success depends on winning a narrow, non-deterministic timing window, so repeated attempts are normally required. No public exploit code has been identified and CISA's SSVC assessment rates exploitation as 'none', making this a moderate-priority local elevation issue rather than a widespread-exploitation emergency, despite the high technical impact of the race class and its presence in a ubiquitous platform.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: update Windows 11 to build 10.0.26100.9445 (24H2), 10.0.26200.9445 (25H2), or 10.0.28000.2954 (26H1) or later, distributed through Windows Update, Windows Server Update Services, or the Microsoft Update Catalog, as documented in the MSRC update guide at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-71347. Because the fix addresses a synchronization flaw in a core OS component, there is no meaningful configuration toggle that closes the race while preserving full Windows Security Center functionality, and disabling or neutering the Security Center is explicitly a poor trade-off since it removes protection state monitoring, results in unsupported configurations, and may itself increase exposure. Effective compensating controls therefore target the preconditions rather than the code path: enforce strict least privilege so that the set of accounts able to execute code locally with high privileges (the PR:H requirement) is kept as small as operationally possible, and audit those accounts regularly - the trade-off is increased administrative friction and the need for break-glass procedures. Deploy Windows Defender Application Control (WDAC) or AppLocker in enforcement mode to block untrusted or unsigned binaries from running on endpoints, which denies an attacker the local execution foothold the race requires, at the cost of application compatibility testing and ongoing policy maintenance. Segment and monitor privileged local sessions with endpoint detection and response, alerting on anomalous token or privilege-change behavior originating from Security Center-related processes; this does not prevent the race but shortens detection time. Finally, because exploitation is timing-sensitive (AC:H) and no public exploit code is known, prioritization can follow standard patch-cycle cadence for high-privilege local escalation issues, with the understanding that exploitation is not confirmed in the wild.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9445
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9445
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.2954

Affected Packages

euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9445
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9445
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.2954

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 3 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-362, concurrent execution using a shared resource with improper synchronization - a classic race condition in which two or more execution threads or processes access Windows Security Center state without adequate locking or atomicity. This can manifest as a time-of-check/time-of-use (TOCTOU) style flaw: the component verifies the caller's identity or a security-relevant property at one point, but the underlying object can be modified between the check and the subsequent privileged operation, allowing a lower-privileged or otherwise restricted context to act with elevated rights. The CVSS 3.1 vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H confirms the key constraints: the attack surface is strictly local (AV:L), no user interaction is needed (UI:N), the impact scope is unchanged (S:U) but confidentiality, integrity, and availability are all rated High, and the practical difficulty is dominated by AC:H and PR:H. Windows Security Center is a core platform service that brokers security posture and protection state information, so a successful race can produce state inconsistencies that a privileged attacker then leverages; because the component sits inside the OS rather than a remote service, there is no network-reachable attack path here. Microsoft's own metadata tags the issue as involving a race condition and information disclosure, indicating the race primitives can leak or corrupt state before being chained into privilege elevation.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 6.4 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 6.4 MEDIUM

Local-only race condition (AV:L, AC:H) exploitable only by an already-privileged user (PR:H); winning the race yields full control of the host, so C/I/A:H.

3.1 AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:19 cve.org
MEDIUM 6.4

DescriptionCVE.org

Concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows Security Center allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 89% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Core Windows 11 component present on vast numbers of enterprise and consumer endpoints
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Race conditions occur when multiple concurrent requests exploit the brief time gap between checking a condition and acting upon it (TOCTOU - Time of Check, Time of Use).

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy