Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain local low-privileged access
-
DeliveryInvoke Windows Installer operation
-
ExploitTrigger use-after-free race window
-
ExecutionReuse freed object with controlled data
-
PersistExecute code as SYSTEM
-
ImpactFull host compromise
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already have local access to the target with at least low-level (standard user) privileges (PR:L, AV:L) - there is no remote or network path. The flaw lies in the Windows Installer component, so the attacker must be able to invoke or interact with an installer operation to reach the vulnerable code. The primary limiting factor is the high attack complexity (AC:H), characteristic of a use-after-free that depends on winning a memory-reuse race, making reliable exploitation non-trivial. No user interaction is required (UI:N). These constraints make this a post-compromise privilege-escalation primitive rather than an initial-access vector. |
| Impact | The provided CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.0 HIGH) describes a local-only elevation-of-privilege flaw: the attacker must already have local access and low-level privileges (PR:L), and exploitation is gated by high attack complexity (AC:H) - consistent with a use-after-free (CWE-416) that typically requires winning a race or precisely controlling allocation timing. No EPSS score was supplied, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified. The CVE is NOT listed in CISA KEV and no public exploit (POC) is indicated in the input, so this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' No SSVC decision data was provided. Netting these signals: this is a credible but not emergency-tier issue - the HIGH CVSS is driven by full C/I/A impact (SYSTEM-level compromise once exploited), but the local vector, required authentication, and high complexity substantially limit real-world mass exploitation. It is best treated as a standard patch-cycle priority rather than a drop-everything item, with the caveat that local EoP bugs in Windows Installer are attractive as the privilege-escalation link in post-compromise chains. Note: the input 'Denial Of Service' tag partially conflicts with the description, which states privilege elevation, not availability loss; the A:H metric covers the availability dimension. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who already has a low-privileged local account on a Windows host (e.g., via phishing, a stolen credential, or an earlier foothold) runs a crafted program that triggers the use-after-free in Windows Installer, winning the required race condition to reuse freed memory. Successful exploitation elevates them from a standard user to SYSTEM, granting full control of the machine. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and the high attack complexity means reliable exploitation requires precise timing. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026
Local privilege escalation in Microsoft Windows Installer lets an authenticated attacker who already holds low-level (standard user) rights on a Windows host trigger a use-after-free and gain SYSTEM-level code execution. Every supported Windows client and server release in scope is affected - Windows 10, Windows 11 (23H2 through 26H2), and Windows Server 2012 through 2025, including Server Core installations. Exploitation is local-only and gated by high attack complexity (a memory-reuse race), so it is a post-compromise escalation primitive rather than an initial-access vector; no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and no CISA KEV listing.
RemediationAI
Patch available per vendor advisory: apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-70272 from the MSRC update guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70272), which rolls each affected Windows build to or above the remediated levels identified in the affected-version data - for example 10.0.26100.33650 for Server 2025/Windows 11 24H2, 10.0.26200.9711 for Windows 11 25H2, 10.0.22631.7652 for Windows 11 23H2, 10.0.19044.7807 for Windows 10 21H2/22H2, 10.0.17763.9376 for Windows 10 1809/Server 2019, and 10.0.14393.9612 for Windows 10 1607/Server 2016; confirm the installed build number after servicing rather than assuming. Because exploitation requires an attacker to already have a local standard-user foothold and to drive an Installer operation, the highest-value compensating control is cutting that foothold: enforce least privilege and remove unnecessary local interactive or RDP access, and use WDAC or AppLocker to block execution of untrusted binaries that could invoke msiexec. Blocking or disabling the Windows Installer service (msiserver) does close the local attack surface, but the trade-off is severe - all MSI package installs, repairs, upgrades, and many enterprise software deployments and updates will fail until the service is re-enabled, so this is only realistic on hardened, tightly managed server tiers. Logging and alerting on msiexec executions from unusual parent processes or user contexts, plus prompt crash telemetry review of the Installer process, provides detection value but does not prevent exploitation. Rotating credentials or reviewing privileges after suspected exploitation is advisable given the post-compromise nature of this flaw.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 20 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Windows Installer is the MSI-based installation and servicing subsystem on Windows, implemented by msiexec.exe and msi.dll and backed by the privileged msiserver service, which processes installer databases, transforms, patches, and custom actions - much of that content supplied by users or applications and parsed in a SYSTEM-level context. The root cause class here is CWE-416 (use after free): a heap object inside the Installer is released while a reference to it survives, and a later dereference of that dangling pointer reads or writes memory that may already have been reallocated. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) captures the resulting boundary: local access plus standard-user privileges are prerequisites, no victim interaction is needed, and the high attack complexity reflects the heap grooming and timing control required to win the reuse race reliably. Because the vulnerable component runs with elevated privileges, a successful dangling-pointer reuse converts a standard user token into code running as SYSTEM or an administrative service context. Note the supplied tags also flag memory corruption and denial of service, which fits the same defect surface: unreliable exploitation attempts can crash the Installer process even when privilege escalation fails.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local-only EoP requiring an existing low-priv account (AV:L/PR:L); use-after-free race gives AC:H; successful exploit yields SYSTEM so C/I/A all High.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Use after free in Windows Installer allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Executive ViewAI
A high-severity local privilege escalation flaw in Microsoft Windows Installer affects nearly the entire supported Windows estate - Windows 10, Windows 11 releases 23H2 through 26H2, and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 including Server Core - allowing an attacker with an existing low-privilege foothold on a host to elevate to SYSTEM-level code execution. It is a post-compromise escalation primitive rather than an initial-access vector, so it does not change how an intruder gets in, but it materially increases what they can do once inside. Leadership should care because the affected population is effectively every Windows endpoint and server the organization operates, and any single compromised asset could be converted into full administrative control of that system.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.
Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2026-99262
GHSA-m7wp-6wr2-w8jp
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB