Skip to main content

Microsoft Defender CVE-2026-70264

| EUVDEUVD-2026-100136 MEDIUM
Improper Link Resolution Before File Access (CWE-59)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-878h-ggqr-r6qq
5.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged local foothold
  2. Delivery
    Plant crafted symbolic/hard link
  3. Exploit
    Defender follows link during file access
  4. Execution
    Read privileged file contents
  5. Impact
    Disclose sensitive information locally

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V5 - File Handling Symlink resolution safety
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already hold a local, authenticated low-privileged account on the Windows host (CVSS PR:L, AV:L) - this is not remotely reachable. The attacker must be able to create or control a filesystem link (symbolic or hard link, per CWE-59) that a Microsoft Defender file-access operation then resolves, causing Defender to read a file on the attacker's behalf. Limiting factors: no remote vector, prior local access is mandatory, impact is confined to information disclosure (no write/integrity or availability effect), and affected deployments are those running Windows Defender platform versions below 1.1.26090.9; updating to that build removes the condition.

Impact

This is a genuine-but-moderate priority, not a drop-everything issue. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, base 5.5) describes a local, low-complexity attack requiring an already-authenticated low-privileged account, yielding high confidentiality impact only (no integrity or availability loss). All exploitation signals point low: CISA SSVC rates Exploitation as 'none', Automatable as 'no', and Technical Impact as only 'partial', which is internally consistent with the local, single-system, info-disclosure nature of CWE-59 link-following. No EPSS score was supplied in the input, the CVE is not on CISA KEV, and no public proof-of-concept is referenced - so exploitation is unconfirmed on every available signal. The main real-world consideration is prevalence rather than exploitability: Microsoft Defender ships on essentially every modern Windows endpoint, so the installed base is enormous even though the attack itself requires prior local access and only leaks information. No signals conflict here; the picture is coherent (low exploitation likelihood, high deployment, limited impact). Note that EPSS is absent, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quoted.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A low-privileged user (or malware already running under such an account) on a Windows host plants or manipulates a symbolic/hard link so that a Microsoft Defender operation follows it and accesses a file the attacker should not be able to read, disclosing its contents. Exploitation is entirely local and requires an existing foothold, with no user interaction. No public exploit code is referenced for this CVE.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Microsoft Defender platform builds earlier than 1.1.26090.9 resolve filesystem links without properly validating them, allowing an attacker who already holds a local, low-privileged account to plant a symbolic link, junction, or hard link that Defender's own file access then follows, disclosing the contents of a file the attacker could not otherwise read. The assessed vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, base 5.5) confirms this is strictly local, requires prior authenticated access (PR:L), and results in confidentiality impact only, with no integrity or availability effect and no remote path. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, CISA's SSVC assessment records exploitation as none and automatable as no, and Microsoft has shipped a fixed Defender platform build, making this a moderate-priority hardening item rather than an emergency patch.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor fix by ensuring the Microsoft Defender platform is updated to version 1.1.26090.9 or later (Microsoft's advisory is at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70264); verify the installed platform build with Get-MpComputerStatus and check AMProductVersion, since platform updates roll out on their own cadence via Windows Update/Microsoft Update and Microsoft Update Catalog rather than through monthly OS servicing. If a host cannot be updated immediately, the compensating control that matches the threat model is to remove the attacker's ability to create the link in the first place, or to take away the local foothold the exploit requires: on Windows 10 and later, symbolic link creation requires the SeCreateSymbolicLinkPrivilege (granted by Developer Mode or to administrators), so disabling Developer Mode and auditing that privilege assignment blocks the most common symlink variant, though it does not stop NTFS hard links or junctions that standard users can still create within directories they control. Because the bug requires local code execution (AV:L/PR:L), restricting interactive logon and RDP access to trusted users, and applying least privilege so that unprivileged accounts cannot write to directories Defender scans, materially shrinks exposure; the trade-off is operational friction for legitimate developer workflows and for users who rely on junctions in profile or cache directories. Note that no signature or definition update alone addresses the flaw; the fix is in the platform build, and per Microsoft the information disclosure is local and low-severity, so this can be scheduled with routine Defender platform hygiene rather than treated as an emergency.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Defender 0 <1.1.26090.9

Affected Packages

euvd windows_defender fix: 1.1.26090.9

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-59, 'Improper Link Resolution Before File Access (Link Following),' a class of bug that arises when a privileged process opens a path that an unprivileged user can influence through the filesystem namespace. On Windows this includes symbolic links, NTFS junctions, mount points, and hard links; if Defender resolves such a link before applying its access checks or before it accounts for the fact that the target has changed, it can be tricked into reading an arbitrary file with its own token and then exposing that content to the link's creator. The affected component is the Defender antimalware platform itself, identified by ENISA EUVD as 'Windows Defender 0 < 1.1.26090.9,' i.e. every platform build below 1.1.26090.9 on hosts where the Defender platform is installed. The scope of the flaw is deliberately narrow per the assessed vector: S:U means the compromise does not cross a security authority boundary, C:H with I:N/A:N means the outcome is bounded to information disclosure, and AV:L/PR:L means the attacker must already be running code locally as an authenticated user before the bug is reachable. No CPE strings were supplied beyond the EUVD version range, so treat the platform build number, not the Windows OS build, as the version selector.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 5.5 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
ENISA EUVD HIGH
vuln.today AI 5.5 MEDIUM

Local link-following by an already-authenticated low-privileged user (AV:L, PR:L, AC:L, UI:N); impact is confidentiality-only disclosure, so C:H with I:N/A:N and unchanged scope.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:19 cve.org
MEDIUM 5.5

DescriptionCVE.org

Improper link resolution before file access ('link following') in Microsoft Defender allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 64% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Microsoft Defender ships built-in on virtually all modern Windows endpoints
Threat Intel
1
1 sources
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

33
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +28
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: +5

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy