Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Identify Windows DHCP Server on target network
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted malformed DHCP packet to UDP port 67
  3. Exploit
    Trigger out-of-bounds read in DHCP packet parser
  4. Execution
    Receive or infer leaked server memory contents
  5. Impact
    Extract sensitive data from disclosed memory

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

No authentication is required - DHCP by design accepts unauthenticated packets from any network client, so PR:N accurately reflects the protocol's open nature. The primary prerequisite is that the Windows DHCP Server role must be explicitly installed and running on the target system; this role is not enabled by default on Windows Server or Windows 10, limiting exposure to systems where it has been deliberately deployed. Network reachability to UDP port 67 on the target server is required; standard enterprise perimeter firewalls block this port from external networks, confining realistic exploitation to internal network segments or VLANs with DHCP service access. No specific client OS, DHCP option, or non-default DHCP Server configuration is documented as a prerequisite beyond the role being active.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N confirms unauthenticated, low-complexity network exploitation with confidentiality-only impact - there is no code execution or denial-of-service component disclosed. DHCP's broadcast nature means any LAN-adjacent host can send packets to UDP port 67 without prior network enumeration, lowering the practical bar. Despite this, EPSS at 0.77% (53rd percentile) indicates exploitation is not currently observed at scale, and the absence from CISA KEV reinforces that this is not a confirmed threat-actor target at this time. Even a mid-sized municipal IT team in sopot should treat this as urgent enough to include in the next standard Windows patch cycle, particularly on domain DHCP servers that may hold network topology, lease data, or other infrastructure details in memory adjacent to the vulnerable buffer. The most significant complicating factor is that Windows Server 2012 and 2012 R2 are end-of-life platforms; organizations relying on those systems must hold active Extended Security Update (ESU) subscriptions to receive this patch, otherwise they remain unpatched without an easy alternative.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker on the same LAN segment as a Windows DHCP Server - or any host routable to UDP port 67 on that server - sends a specially crafted DHCP Discover or Request packet containing a malformed option or length field that triggers the out-of-bounds read in the server's packet parser. The server's response or a detectable behavioral side-channel reveals bytes from adjacent memory, which may include cached network configuration data, lease table contents, or other sensitive server state. No public POC is known at time of analysis, but the low attack complexity (AC:L) suggests an independent trigger could be developed by a skilled attacker through DHCP protocol fuzzing.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.8% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv2 – Sep 10, 2026

Out-of-bounds read in the Windows DHCP Server component allows unauthenticated network attackers to disclose potentially sensitive server memory contents by sending a specially crafted DHCP packet. The flaw spans a broad range of Windows releases from Server 2012 through Server 2025 and certain Windows 10 builds, with Microsoft-confirmed patches available and exact fix build numbers documented by ENISA EUVD-2026-73249. No public exploit code and no CISA KEV listing exist at time of analysis; EPSS at 0.77% (53rd percentile) reflects low current exploitation probability despite the trivially low attack complexity.

Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
v1 Sep 09, 2026 - 04:30 CVSS 5.9

Out-of-bounds memory read in the Windows DHCP Server service exposes sensitive server-process memory to unauthenticated network attackers via crafted DHCP packets. Affecting Windows Server 2012 through 2025 and two Windows 10 LTSC/SAC builds (1607 and 1809), the flaw carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 5.9 with high attack complexity limiting practical exploitation. Microsoft has released cumulative updates for all affected builds, and no public exploit or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-70124, delivered via Windows Update, WSUS, or SCCM, targeting the minimum fixed builds documented per platform in EUVD-2026-73249 (e.g., Windows Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.33438, Windows Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5622, Windows Server 2019 to 10.0.17763.9245, Windows Server 2016 to 10.0.14393.9512). Organizations running Windows Server 2012 or 2012 R2 must verify active ESU enrollment before expecting to receive this patch; without it, those systems remain exposed. As an interim compensating control, restrict inbound UDP port 67 traffic on network firewalls and internal VLAN ACLs to only subnets that legitimately obtain DHCP leases from the server - this narrows the exploitable network reach without disrupting DHCP functionality. Where the DHCP Server role is not actively needed on a given system, disabling it via Server Manager or PowerShell (Remove-WindowsFeature DHCP) eliminates the attack surface entirely. Advisory: https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70124.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26349
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9245
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33438
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23397
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33438
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9245
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9512
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26349
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9245
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23397
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5622
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9512
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9512

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9512
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9245
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26349
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23397
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23397
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26349
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9512
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9512
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9245
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9245
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5622
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33438
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33438

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 13 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerable component is the Windows DHCP Server service, which processes Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol packets per RFC 2131 over UDP port 67. CWE-125 (Out-of-Bounds Read) indicates that packet parsing logic reads beyond an allocated buffer boundary when handling a malformed DHCP request, potentially exposing adjacent heap or stack memory to the requester. CPE data confirms the flaw is present across a long Windows codebase lineage: from Windows Server 2012 (kernel 6.2.9200) through Windows Server 2025 (kernel 10.0.26100), plus Windows 10 client builds 1607 and 1809. The presence of client CPEs alongside server CPEs suggests the vulnerable DHCP parsing code is shared across Windows editions, though the DHCP Server role itself is not installed by default on either platform. DHCP's design as an unauthenticated, broadcast-capable protocol means the attack surface is inherently wider than most network services requiring prior authentication.

Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 7.5 HIGH

DHCP server accepts unauthenticated network packets by design; OOB read exposes memory with no write or availability impact path.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from NVD.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

5
Analysis Updated
Sep 10, 2026 - 16:59 vuln.today
v2 - CVSS changed
Severity Changed
Sep 10, 2026 - 16:52 NVD
MEDIUM HIGH
CVSS changed
Sep 10, 2026 - 16:52 NVD
5.9 (MEDIUM) 7.5 (HIGH)
Patch available
Sep 08, 2026 - 18:35 EUVD
CVE Published
Sep 08, 2026 - 18:20 cve.org
MEDIUM 5.9

DescriptionNVD

Out-of-bounds read in Windows DHCP Server allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Microsoft Windows DHCP Server, a critical infrastructure component across enterprise deployments, contains a vulnerability allowing unauthenticated attackers to access server memory and potentially expose credentials or confidential data. Though vendor patches are available and active exploitation remains limited, the fundamental role of DHCP in network operations requires prompt remediation to protect against unauthorized information disclosure.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.8%
Top 47% exploitable
Prevalence
High
common Windows Server role in enterprise Active Directory environments
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Unlikely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.8%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy