Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessLure victim to malicious network share
-
DeliveryDeliver crafted CSC/offline-files response
-
ExploitTrigger heap overflow in CSC service
-
ExecutionExecute code in privileged context
-
ImpactGain elevated system privileges
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation targets the Windows Client-Side Caching (CSC) / Offline Files service, which caches content from SMB network shares. The attacker must get a victim to interact (UI:R) - typically by connecting to or accessing an attacker-controlled network share/resource so the CSC service parses a crafted response and overflows a heap buffer. Limiting factors: required user interaction (no fully automatic/wormable path, consistent with SSVC Automatable:no), and vendor patches are already available across all affected builds; unpatched, default Windows installations with Offline Files/CSC in use are exposed over the network. |
| Impact | This is a serious but not emergency-grade issue. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 8.8) describes network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated exploitation with full confidentiality/integrity/availability impact, gated only by required user interaction. CISA's SSVC framework tempers this: Exploitation is rated 'none' (no observed attacks), Automatable is 'no' (UI:R breaks reliable mass-automation), while Technical Impact is 'total' - consistent with the heap overflow yielding full system control. There is no CISA KEV listing and no public POC in the provided data, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' Note a real labeling tension defenders should be aware of: Microsoft's description frames this as privilege elevation ('elevate privileges over a network'), yet the CVSS vector carries PR:N (unauthenticated) and AV:N - more characteristic of remote code execution than classic local EoP. This is Microsoft's standard characterization for CSC EoP flaws triggered via a malicious network resource, but verify the exact exploitation path with MSRC before assuming no authentication foothold is needed. Net: a patch-promptly priority given ubiquitous Windows exposure and total impact, but the UI:R requirement and 'Exploitation: none' SSVC signal argue against drop-everything urgency absent new exploitation evidence. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker lures a user into connecting to an attacker-controlled network share or offline-files resource; the Client-Side Caching service processes a maliciously crafted response and overflows a heap buffer, letting the attacker run code in the service's privileged context. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and the single required click/connection (UI:R) is the main hurdle. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Privilege elevation on unpatched Windows hosts is possible through a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122) in the Client-Side Caching (CSC) / Offline Files service, which caches content fetched from SMB network shares. The assessed vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R) describes an unauthenticated remote attacker, but success hinges on a victim interacting - typically by connecting to or accessing an attacker-controlled share so CSC parses a crafted response and overflows a heap buffer - which is consistent with SSVC rating automatic exploitation as 'no' and with the SSVC exploitation signal of 'none'. Microsoft has released patches for every affected build, and no public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, so this is a serious but not emergency-grade issue demanding prompt, scheduled patching rather than crisis response.
RemediationAI
Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-70068 as documented in the MSRC update guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70068), bringing each host to at or above the fixed build listed for its edition - for example 10.0.17763.9376 for Windows Server 2019 and Windows 10 1809, 10.0.14393.9612 for Windows Server 2016 and Windows 10 1607, 10.0.19044.7807 for Windows 10 21H2/22H2, 10.0.20348.5761 for Windows Server 2022, and 10.0.26100.33650 for Windows Server 2025 / Windows 11 24H2-adjacent builds; the patch is vendor-released and available, so no compensating control is a substitute for updating. Where patching must be staged, reduce exposure by disabling the Offline Files feature / stopping the CSC service (Computer Configuration or 'csc' service configuration) on systems that do not need cached SMB content - accepting that mobile users lose offline file availability - and by blocking outbound SMB (TCP 445) from user workstations to untrusted or internet-routable networks to prevent users from reaching attacker-controlled shares, with the trade-off of breaking legitimate access to remote file servers that are not reachable through an approved path. Note that the attack requires a user to access a malicious share, so user awareness messaging about opening or connecting to untrusted network shares complements, but does not replace, the patch. No vendor-published workaround removing the flaw without updating is identified in the available data.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 20 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The Client-Side Caching (CSC) service, exposed to users as Offline Files, is the Windows component that transparently caches files from SMB network shares so they remain available when the network is unavailable; the service runs in a privileged context and parses network-supplied metadata and file content. CWE-122 (heap-based buffer overflow) indicates that a length or size value derived from attacker-controlled input is not correctly validated before a heap allocation or copy, so a crafted response from a network share causes data to be written past the end of a heap buffer. Such corruption in a privileged service creates a classic privilege-elevation primitive, matching the CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) and the SSVC technical impact rating of 'total'. The PR:N component of the vector confirms the overflow trigger itself requires no prior authentication, while UI:R reflects the practical prerequisite that the target user must connect to or otherwise access the malicious share or resource that feeds the crafted data to CSC. Because the attack surface is network-facing SMB/Offline Files functionality rather than a local-only parser, unpatched default installations that actually use CSC are the relevant risk group.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-reachable CSC service triggered via a malicious resource needing one user action, so AV:N/PR:N/UI:R; heap overflow yields code execution in a privileged context giving total C/I/A impact within one scope.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Client-Side Caching (CSC) Service allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Executive ViewAI
A high-severity privilege elevation flaw in the Windows Client-Side Caching (Offline Files) service allows an attacker to gain elevated rights on affected hosts, with the added risk that the vulnerable component is the same one organizations rely on for offline access to file shares. Exploitation requires a user to interact with attacker-controlled content, typically by connecting to a malicious SMB share, so the exposure is driven by user behavior and by how broadly Offline Files is enabled across the estate rather than by opportunistic scanning. Leadership should treat this as a scheduled, high-priority patch event affecting the full Windows client and server footprint, not a crisis requiring emergency change control.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2026-99682
GHSA-649g-vvx3-jhhq
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB