Skip to main content

Remote Desktop Client CVE-2026-70012

| EUVDEUVD-2026-99856 HIGH
Use After Free (CWE-416)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-gqrh-69vp-vmmw
7.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Lure victim to malicious RDP endpoint
  2. Delivery
    Victim initiates client connection
  3. Exploit
    Server sends crafted response data
  4. Execution
    Trigger use-after-free in client
  5. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code as user

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the victim to initiate a Remote Desktop Client connection to an attacker-controlled or compromised RDP server (UI:R), so the attacker cannot reach a passive target directly - a malicious .rdp file, link, or hijacked server is the realistic delivery path. The vector is network-reachable and unauthenticated on the client side (AV:N/PR:N), but high attack complexity (AC:H) implies the attacker must win a specific race or memory-state condition to reliably trigger the use-after-free, and SSVC Automatable=no indicates it cannot be dependably automated at scale. Limiting factors: mandatory user interaction, dependence on the user connecting outbound to an untrusted server, and the non-trivial exploitation conditions of the UAF.

Impact

Signals are mixed and point to a serious-but-not-emergency priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R) describes a network-reachable, unauthenticated flaw, but the high attack complexity (AC:H) and required user interaction (UI:R) materially constrain real-world exploitation - this is a client-side use-after-free (CWE-416) in the Remote Desktop Client, meaning the victim must be induced to connect to an attacker-controlled or compromised RDP server rather than the attacker reaching the target directly. CISA's SSVC framework reinforces a lower urgency: Exploitation=none (no observed exploitation), Automatable=no (cannot be reliably mass-exploited, consistent with AC:H and UI:R), though Technical Impact=total aligns with the C:H/I:H/A:H full-compromise rating. No EPSS score was provided in the input, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified here. The CVE is NOT on CISA KEV and no POC is referenced, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Net: a legitimately high-severity memory-corruption RCE with full technical impact, but current data (no exploitation, non-automatable, interaction-gated) suggests it is a patch-on-normal-cadence item rather than a drop-everything emergency, pending any change in exploitation status.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker stands up a malicious RDP server (or compromises a legitimate one) and lures a user into connecting to it, for example via a crafted .rdp file or link. When the Remote Desktop Client processes attacker-controlled server data, a use-after-free is triggered, allowing arbitrary code execution in the context of the connecting user. High attack complexity (AC:H) and the need for the victim to initiate the connection (UI:R) make reliable exploitation non-trivial; no public exploit is identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.6% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Use-after-free in the Windows Remote Desktop Client lets an unauthenticated attacker execute arbitrary code on a connecting client by luring a user into initiating an RDP session to an attacker-controlled or compromised server. The vector is network-reachable with no privileges required (PR:N), but practical exploitation depends on the victim starting the outbound connection (UI:R) and on the attacker winning a specific memory-state or timing condition (AC:H), which is consistent with CISA's SSVC rating of non-automatable and no observed exploitation. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and Microsoft has published fixed builds covering all affected Windows 10, Windows 11 and Windows Server platforms; because the trigger is client-initiated rather than a passive listening service, the realistic delivery paths are malicious .rdp files, crafted links, or a hijacked RDP endpoint.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: Microsoft has published fixed builds for every affected platform through its update guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70012), so the primary action is to apply the current monthly cumulative update to all Windows clients and servers - fixed levels include 10.0.22631.7652 for Windows 11 23H2, 10.0.26100.9711 for 24H2, 10.0.19044.7807 for Windows 10 21H2/22H2, 10.0.14393.9612 for Server 2016 and Windows 10 1607, 10.0.17763.9376 for Server 2019/Windows 10 1809, 10.0.20348.5761 for Server 2022, 10.0.26100.33650 for Server 2025, 6.2.9200.26434 for Server 2012 and 6.3.9600.23470 for Server 2012 R2. Until patching completes, compensating controls should target the client-initiated attack path: block or tightly allowlist outbound RDP (TCP/UDP 3389) at the host firewall or egress proxy so users cannot reach untrusted RDP servers, at the cost of breaking legitimate remote administration from those hosts; treat .rdp files and rdp:// links as untrusted content by removing their automatic file association or quarantining them at the mail/web gateway, which adds friction for routine remote-desktop use; and require RDP server certificate validation plus, where the infrastructure supports it, RDP restricted-admin/RD Gateway brokering so users connect only to known-good endpoints. Given CISA's SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: no) and the absence of identified public exploit code, these protections can follow the normal monthly patch cadence rather than an emergency response, but internet-exposed or BYOD endpoints that routinely open third-party .rdp files should be prioritized.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability is a use-after-free (CWE-416) in the Remote Desktop Client, the Windows component (primarily mstsc.exe and its RDP core libraries) that parses server-side protocol data during an outbound RDP session. A memory object is released while a reference to it remains live, so a subsequent dereference operates on freed heap memory, which can be steered by heap grooming into code execution or, more simply, into a crash of the client session - matching the supplied tags of Use After Free, Memory Corruption and Denial Of Service. The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H shows the attacker does not need credentials and can reach the target across a network, but must convince the user to connect outward to a hostile server and must satisfy non-trivial heap-timing conditions, which is why the attack complexity is high and no scope change is recorded. Affected CPE coverage spans a very broad Windows estate: Windows 10 1607/1809/21H2/22H2, Windows 11 23H2/24H2/25H2/26H1/26H2, Windows Server 2012 and 2012 R2 (including Server Core), 2016, 2019, 2022 and 2025 (including Server Core), with fixed builds such as 10.0.22631.7652, 10.0.26100.33650, 10.0.19044.7807 and 6.2.9200.26434. The vulnerability maps to EUVD-2026-99856 and was reported by secure@microsoft.com.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.5 HIGH

Client-side UAF triggered by a malicious RDP server, so AV:N with UI:R and PR:N; AC:H reflects the non-deterministic use-after-free race, with full C/I/A impact on the user context.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:19 cve.org
HIGH 7.5

DescriptionCVE.org

Use after free in Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A memory-safety flaw in the Windows Remote Desktop Client - the component installed on virtually every managed Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server endpoint in the estate - allows an attacker to run arbitrary code on the machine of any employee who connects to a malicious or hijacked RDP endpoint, including through a lure as simple as opening a crafted .rdp file or link. Because the trigger is the outbound connection rather than a listening service, the exposure follows user behavior and third-party RDP destinations rather than perimeter architecture, which means it can reach users on VPN-only and remote-work devices that traditional network controls do not cover. Microsoft has released fixed builds and there is no confirmed active exploitation or public exploit code at time of analysis, so this is a manageable, patch-driven risk provided remediation is completed on the same cadence as normal monthly updates.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.6%
Top 54% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Remote Desktop Client ships with virtually all supported Windows editions
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Unlikely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.6%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.

Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy