Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessLure victim to malicious RDP endpoint
-
DeliveryVictim initiates client connection
-
ExploitServer sends crafted response data
-
ExecutionTrigger use-after-free in client
-
ImpactExecute arbitrary code as user
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the victim to initiate a Remote Desktop Client connection to an attacker-controlled or compromised RDP server (UI:R), so the attacker cannot reach a passive target directly - a malicious .rdp file, link, or hijacked server is the realistic delivery path. The vector is network-reachable and unauthenticated on the client side (AV:N/PR:N), but high attack complexity (AC:H) implies the attacker must win a specific race or memory-state condition to reliably trigger the use-after-free, and SSVC Automatable=no indicates it cannot be dependably automated at scale. Limiting factors: mandatory user interaction, dependence on the user connecting outbound to an untrusted server, and the non-trivial exploitation conditions of the UAF. |
| Impact | Signals are mixed and point to a serious-but-not-emergency priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R) describes a network-reachable, unauthenticated flaw, but the high attack complexity (AC:H) and required user interaction (UI:R) materially constrain real-world exploitation - this is a client-side use-after-free (CWE-416) in the Remote Desktop Client, meaning the victim must be induced to connect to an attacker-controlled or compromised RDP server rather than the attacker reaching the target directly. CISA's SSVC framework reinforces a lower urgency: Exploitation=none (no observed exploitation), Automatable=no (cannot be reliably mass-exploited, consistent with AC:H and UI:R), though Technical Impact=total aligns with the C:H/I:H/A:H full-compromise rating. No EPSS score was provided in the input, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified here. The CVE is NOT on CISA KEV and no POC is referenced, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Net: a legitimately high-severity memory-corruption RCE with full technical impact, but current data (no exploitation, non-automatable, interaction-gated) suggests it is a patch-on-normal-cadence item rather than a drop-everything emergency, pending any change in exploitation status. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker stands up a malicious RDP server (or compromises a legitimate one) and lures a user into connecting to it, for example via a crafted .rdp file or link. When the Remote Desktop Client processes attacker-controlled server data, a use-after-free is triggered, allowing arbitrary code execution in the context of the connecting user. High attack complexity (AC:H) and the need for the victim to initiate the connection (UI:R) make reliable exploitation non-trivial; no public exploit is identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Use-after-free in the Windows Remote Desktop Client lets an unauthenticated attacker execute arbitrary code on a connecting client by luring a user into initiating an RDP session to an attacker-controlled or compromised server. The vector is network-reachable with no privileges required (PR:N), but practical exploitation depends on the victim starting the outbound connection (UI:R) and on the attacker winning a specific memory-state or timing condition (AC:H), which is consistent with CISA's SSVC rating of non-automatable and no observed exploitation. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and Microsoft has published fixed builds covering all affected Windows 10, Windows 11 and Windows Server platforms; because the trigger is client-initiated rather than a passive listening service, the realistic delivery paths are malicious .rdp files, crafted links, or a hijacked RDP endpoint.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: Microsoft has published fixed builds for every affected platform through its update guide (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-70012), so the primary action is to apply the current monthly cumulative update to all Windows clients and servers - fixed levels include 10.0.22631.7652 for Windows 11 23H2, 10.0.26100.9711 for 24H2, 10.0.19044.7807 for Windows 10 21H2/22H2, 10.0.14393.9612 for Server 2016 and Windows 10 1607, 10.0.17763.9376 for Server 2019/Windows 10 1809, 10.0.20348.5761 for Server 2022, 10.0.26100.33650 for Server 2025, 6.2.9200.26434 for Server 2012 and 6.3.9600.23470 for Server 2012 R2. Until patching completes, compensating controls should target the client-initiated attack path: block or tightly allowlist outbound RDP (TCP/UDP 3389) at the host firewall or egress proxy so users cannot reach untrusted RDP servers, at the cost of breaking legitimate remote administration from those hosts; treat .rdp files and rdp:// links as untrusted content by removing their automatic file association or quarantining them at the mail/web gateway, which adds friction for routine remote-desktop use; and require RDP server certificate validation plus, where the infrastructure supports it, RDP restricted-admin/RD Gateway brokering so users connect only to known-good endpoints. Given CISA's SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: no) and the absence of identified public exploit code, these protections can follow the normal monthly patch cadence rather than an emergency response, but internet-exposed or BYOD endpoints that routinely open third-party .rdp files should be prioritized.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 20 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability is a use-after-free (CWE-416) in the Remote Desktop Client, the Windows component (primarily mstsc.exe and its RDP core libraries) that parses server-side protocol data during an outbound RDP session. A memory object is released while a reference to it remains live, so a subsequent dereference operates on freed heap memory, which can be steered by heap grooming into code execution or, more simply, into a crash of the client session - matching the supplied tags of Use After Free, Memory Corruption and Denial Of Service. The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H shows the attacker does not need credentials and can reach the target across a network, but must convince the user to connect outward to a hostile server and must satisfy non-trivial heap-timing conditions, which is why the attack complexity is high and no scope change is recorded. Affected CPE coverage spans a very broad Windows estate: Windows 10 1607/1809/21H2/22H2, Windows 11 23H2/24H2/25H2/26H1/26H2, Windows Server 2012 and 2012 R2 (including Server Core), 2016, 2019, 2022 and 2025 (including Server Core), with fixed builds such as 10.0.22631.7652, 10.0.26100.33650, 10.0.19044.7807 and 6.2.9200.26434. The vulnerability maps to EUVD-2026-99856 and was reported by secure@microsoft.com.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Client-side UAF triggered by a malicious RDP server, so AV:N with UI:R and PR:N; AC:H reflects the non-deterministic use-after-free race, with full C/I/A impact on the user context.
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Use after free in Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Executive ViewAI
A memory-safety flaw in the Windows Remote Desktop Client - the component installed on virtually every managed Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server endpoint in the estate - allows an attacker to run arbitrary code on the machine of any employee who connects to a malicious or hijacked RDP endpoint, including through a lure as simple as opening a crafted .rdp file or link. Because the trigger is the outbound connection rather than a listening service, the exposure follows user behavior and third-party RDP destinations rather than perimeter architecture, which means it can reach users on VPN-only and remote-work devices that traditional network controls do not cover. Microsoft has released fixed builds and there is no confirmed active exploitation or public exploit code at time of analysis, so this is a manageable, patch-driven risk provided remediation is completed on the same cadence as normal monthly updates.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.
Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2026-99856
GHSA-gqrh-69vp-vmmw
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB