Skip to main content

Remote Desktop Client CVE-2026-69994

| EUVDEUVD-2026-99852 HIGH
Use After Free (CWE-416)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-v59c-4j4j-w2mv
7.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Stand up malicious RDP server
  2. Delivery
    Lure victim into connecting
  3. Exploit
    Trigger use-after-free in client
  4. Execution
    Win heap race for code execution
  5. Impact
    Compromise victim host

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the victim to initiate an RDP session from the Windows Remote Desktop Client to an attacker-controlled or compromised RDP server (UI:R); the attacker does not authenticate to anything (PR:N) but cannot act without that outbound connection. The AC:H metric indicates a non-trivial condition - a memory race or specific heap state in the use-after-free - must be met for reliable code execution, so exploitation is not guaranteed on a single attempt. Limiting factors for defenders: requires social engineering to get a user to connect to a hostile endpoint, affects the client rather than any exposed listening service, and is fixed by applying the available Microsoft updates.

Impact

Microsoft rates this 7.5 (High) via CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, reflecting network reach and total compromise (C:H/I:H/A:H) but tempered by high attack complexity (AC:H) and required user interaction (UI:R). CISA's SSVC framework reinforces a lower real-world priority: Exploitation=none, Automatable=no, Technical Impact=total - meaning no observed exploitation and no mass-scalable attack path, even though a successful exploit yields full control. There is no CISA KEV listing and no public proof-of-concept in the provided data, and no EPSS score was supplied, so exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified. This is a genuinely serious client-side RCE but, on current signals, a patch-on-normal-cycle item rather than an emergency: the AC:H (likely a race/heap-grooming condition in the use-after-free) plus the need to lure a user into connecting to a malicious RDP endpoint substantially raises the bar versus a wormable, unauthenticated server-side flaw. Note the direction of the vector: the RDP *client* is the victim, so 'over a network' means the attacker operates a malicious/compromised RDP server, not that any listening service is remotely reachable.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker stands up a malicious or compromised RDP server and, via phishing or a crafted .rdp file/link, induces a victim to connect with the Windows Remote Desktop Client. Malformed server responses trigger a use-after-free (CWE-416) in the client, and after winning the required race/memory-grooming condition the attacker executes arbitrary code in the context of the connecting user. No public exploit code is identified in the provided data at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.6% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Use-after-free memory corruption in the Windows Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute code in the context of the connecting user, but only after the victim initiates an outbound RDP session to an attacker-controlled or compromised server. Microsoft rates the issue 7.5 (High) under CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, reflecting a total loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability that is tempered by high attack complexity and mandatory user interaction. CISA's SSVC assessment records exploitation as 'none' and no public exploit identified at time of analysis; Microsoft has released fixed builds through its update guide.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory: apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-69994 (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-69994), which raises the Remote Desktop Client to the EUVD-listed fixed builds for each branch - for example 10.0.19044.7807 for Windows 10 21H2/22H2, 10.0.22631.7652 for Windows 11 23H2, 10.0.26100.9711 for Windows 11 24H2, 10.0.26100.33650 for Windows Server 2025, 10.0.26200.9711 for Windows 11 25H2, 10.0.14393.9612 for Windows Server 2016/Windows 10 1607, 10.0.17763.9376 for Windows Server 2019/Windows 10 1809, 10.0.20348.5761 for Windows Server 2022, 6.2.9200.26434 for Windows Server 2012, and 6.3.9600.23470 for Windows Server 2012 R2. Because this is a client-side flaw that requires a user to connect outbound to a hostile server, the most effective compensating control - if patching must be staged - is to stop users from initiating RDP sessions to untrusted or unknown endpoints, for instance by restricting outbound TCP/3389 (and RDP-over-HTTPS 443 tunnels) at the egress firewall to an allow-list of known corporate RDP hosts, and by removing or blocking standalone .rdp connection files delivered by email or chat; the trade-off is loss of flexibility for legitimate remote access and heavier helpdesk load. Disabling clipboard, drive, and printer redirection in client policy reduces server-supplied attack surface on the virtual channels but does not eliminate the underlying memory-safety defect in the core client, so it should only be treated as a temporary hardening measure while updates roll out. Standard user privileges and application-control/integrity policies limit what a successful exploit can do, but the assessed impact (C:H/I:H/A:H) means they should not be relied on as the primary mitigation. Microsoft has released updates, so no compensating control should be treated as a substitute for patching.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-416 (use after free) in the Remote Desktop Client, the mstsc component that Windows users run to connect outbound to RDP servers. Because the client trusts and parses data supplied by the remote server, a malicious or compromised RDP endpoint can drive the client into freeing a heap object and then referencing it again, enabling memory corruption and, with the right heap grooming and timing, arbitrary code execution. The CVSS vector marks the attack as network reachable (AV:N) and requiring no authentication to the target (PR:N), yet with high attack complexity (AC:H) and required user interaction (UI:R); the independent assessment explains that AC:H reflects a non-trivial condition - a memory race or specific heap state - that must be met for reliable code execution, so success is not guaranteed on a single attempt and repeated user connections may be needed. Notably the defect is client-side: no listening service is exposed, so the exposure comes from users connecting outward, not from inbound RDP traffic to a host. EUVD tracks the affected Windows builds across Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server 2012 through Server 2025 generations, plus their Server Core installations, which matches a shared client binary that is patched per-branch rather than a single product line.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.5 HIGH

Client connects over a network to a malicious server (AV:N) and the user must initiate it (UI:R); the use-after-free requires winning a race, so AC:H; no attacker auth (PR:N) and full compromise of the client (C/I/A:H).

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:19 cve.org
HIGH 7.5

DescriptionCVE.org

Use after free in Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Windows Remote Desktop Client contains a use-after-free vulnerability (CVE-2026-69994) that could allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute code on a victim's machine when they connect to a malicious RDP server, though no public exploit identified at time of analysis. This affects any employee or administrator who initiates outbound RDP sessions to external or untrusted hosts, potentially leading to data theft, lateral movement, or service disruption. Leadership should prioritize patching because RDP is widely used for remote work and IT operations, and a successful exploit could compromise sensitive systems.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.6%
Top 54% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Remote Desktop Client (mstsc) ships built-in on all supported Windows versions
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Unlikely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.6%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.

Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy