Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessStand up malicious RDP server
-
DeliveryLure victim into connecting
-
ExploitTrigger use-after-free in client
-
ExecutionWin heap race for code execution
-
ImpactCompromise victim host
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the victim to initiate an RDP session from the Windows Remote Desktop Client to an attacker-controlled or compromised RDP server (UI:R); the attacker does not authenticate to anything (PR:N) but cannot act without that outbound connection. The AC:H metric indicates a non-trivial condition - a memory race or specific heap state in the use-after-free - must be met for reliable code execution, so exploitation is not guaranteed on a single attempt. Limiting factors for defenders: requires social engineering to get a user to connect to a hostile endpoint, affects the client rather than any exposed listening service, and is fixed by applying the available Microsoft updates. |
| Impact | Microsoft rates this 7.5 (High) via CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, reflecting network reach and total compromise (C:H/I:H/A:H) but tempered by high attack complexity (AC:H) and required user interaction (UI:R). CISA's SSVC framework reinforces a lower real-world priority: Exploitation=none, Automatable=no, Technical Impact=total - meaning no observed exploitation and no mass-scalable attack path, even though a successful exploit yields full control. There is no CISA KEV listing and no public proof-of-concept in the provided data, and no EPSS score was supplied, so exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified. This is a genuinely serious client-side RCE but, on current signals, a patch-on-normal-cycle item rather than an emergency: the AC:H (likely a race/heap-grooming condition in the use-after-free) plus the need to lure a user into connecting to a malicious RDP endpoint substantially raises the bar versus a wormable, unauthenticated server-side flaw. Note the direction of the vector: the RDP *client* is the victim, so 'over a network' means the attacker operates a malicious/compromised RDP server, not that any listening service is remotely reachable. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker stands up a malicious or compromised RDP server and, via phishing or a crafted .rdp file/link, induces a victim to connect with the Windows Remote Desktop Client. Malformed server responses trigger a use-after-free (CWE-416) in the client, and after winning the required race/memory-grooming condition the attacker executes arbitrary code in the context of the connecting user. No public exploit code is identified in the provided data at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Use-after-free memory corruption in the Windows Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute code in the context of the connecting user, but only after the victim initiates an outbound RDP session to an attacker-controlled or compromised server. Microsoft rates the issue 7.5 (High) under CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, reflecting a total loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability that is tempered by high attack complexity and mandatory user interaction. CISA's SSVC assessment records exploitation as 'none' and no public exploit identified at time of analysis; Microsoft has released fixed builds through its update guide.
RemediationAI
Patch available per vendor advisory: apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-69994 (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-69994), which raises the Remote Desktop Client to the EUVD-listed fixed builds for each branch - for example 10.0.19044.7807 for Windows 10 21H2/22H2, 10.0.22631.7652 for Windows 11 23H2, 10.0.26100.9711 for Windows 11 24H2, 10.0.26100.33650 for Windows Server 2025, 10.0.26200.9711 for Windows 11 25H2, 10.0.14393.9612 for Windows Server 2016/Windows 10 1607, 10.0.17763.9376 for Windows Server 2019/Windows 10 1809, 10.0.20348.5761 for Windows Server 2022, 6.2.9200.26434 for Windows Server 2012, and 6.3.9600.23470 for Windows Server 2012 R2. Because this is a client-side flaw that requires a user to connect outbound to a hostile server, the most effective compensating control - if patching must be staged - is to stop users from initiating RDP sessions to untrusted or unknown endpoints, for instance by restricting outbound TCP/3389 (and RDP-over-HTTPS 443 tunnels) at the egress firewall to an allow-list of known corporate RDP hosts, and by removing or blocking standalone .rdp connection files delivered by email or chat; the trade-off is loss of flexibility for legitimate remote access and heavier helpdesk load. Disabling clipboard, drive, and printer redirection in client policy reduces server-supplied attack surface on the virtual channels but does not eliminate the underlying memory-safety defect in the core client, so it should only be treated as a temporary hardening measure while updates roll out. Standard user privileges and application-control/integrity policies limit what a successful exploit can do, but the assessed impact (C:H/I:H/A:H) means they should not be relied on as the primary mitigation. Microsoft has released updates, so no compensating control should be treated as a substitute for patching.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 20 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-416 (use after free) in the Remote Desktop Client, the mstsc component that Windows users run to connect outbound to RDP servers. Because the client trusts and parses data supplied by the remote server, a malicious or compromised RDP endpoint can drive the client into freeing a heap object and then referencing it again, enabling memory corruption and, with the right heap grooming and timing, arbitrary code execution. The CVSS vector marks the attack as network reachable (AV:N) and requiring no authentication to the target (PR:N), yet with high attack complexity (AC:H) and required user interaction (UI:R); the independent assessment explains that AC:H reflects a non-trivial condition - a memory race or specific heap state - that must be met for reliable code execution, so success is not guaranteed on a single attempt and repeated user connections may be needed. Notably the defect is client-side: no listening service is exposed, so the exposure comes from users connecting outward, not from inbound RDP traffic to a host. EUVD tracks the affected Windows builds across Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server 2012 through Server 2025 generations, plus their Server Core installations, which matches a shared client binary that is patched per-branch rather than a single product line.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Client connects over a network to a malicious server (AV:N) and the user must initiate it (UI:R); the use-after-free requires winning a race, so AC:H; no attacker auth (PR:N) and full compromise of the client (C/I/A:H).
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Use after free in Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Executive ViewAI
Windows Remote Desktop Client contains a use-after-free vulnerability (CVE-2026-69994) that could allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute code on a victim's machine when they connect to a malicious RDP server, though no public exploit identified at time of analysis. This affects any employee or administrator who initiates outbound RDP sessions to external or untrusted hosts, potentially leading to data theft, lateral movement, or service disruption. Leadership should prioritize patching because RDP is widely used for remote work and IT operations, and a successful exploit could compromise sensitive systems.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.
Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2026-99852
GHSA-v59c-4j4j-w2mv
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB