Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain low-priv local foothold
  2. Delivery
    Launch crafted process targeting DWM
  3. Exploit
    Trigger type confusion in Desktop Window Manager
  4. Execution
    Corrupt memory to hijack execution
  5. Impact
    Elevate privileges to SYSTEM

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Type safety enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to already have local, low-privileged execution on the target Windows system (CVSS PR:L, AV:L) - this is a post-compromise privilege-escalation primitive, not a remote entry point. The flaw lies in Desktop Window Manager (dwm.exe), a graphics-stack component present and running by default on all Windows desktop installations, so no special feature or non-default configuration is needed to reach the vulnerable code; the type-confusion condition is triggered by a locally executed crafted program. The principal limiting factor is the local-access prerequisite: a remote attacker cannot exploit this directly and must first obtain a foothold. No user interaction is required (UI:N), and attack complexity is low (AC:L), so once local access exists exploitation is straightforward.

Impact

This is a genuine but second-tier priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.8) is internally consistent and credible for a Desktop Window Manager (dwm.exe) type-confusion flaw: it requires local access and low privileges (an authenticated standard user or a process the attacker already controls), but then yields high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact - classic local privilege escalation to SYSTEM. No EPSS score was provided in the input, and KEV status is not present, so there is no signal of active exploitation - per the precision rules this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' No POC was supplied either. The description ('local') and the CVSS attack vector (AV:L) agree, so there is no vector/description conflict. The one notable discrepancy is between the input Tags ('Information Disclosure', 'Memory Corruption') and the actual vulnerability class: this is a type-confusion (CWE-843) elevation-of-privilege issue with full C/I/A impact, not merely information disclosure. The risk profile is typical of Patch-Tuesday EOP bugs: not remotely wormable, but highly valuable as the second stage of an exploit chain after initial access, and therefore a reliable candidate for eventual real-world weaponization once patched details or a POC emerge. Priority: patch promptly, but it is not a drop-everything emergency absent exploitation evidence.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has already gained low-privileged code execution on a Windows host - for example via phishing, a malicious document, or a compromised standard user account - runs a crafted program that triggers the type-confusion condition in Desktop Window Manager to corrupt memory and elevate to SYSTEM. No user interaction is required and attack complexity is low. No public exploit code was identified in the provided data, so this scenario is inferred from the CVSS vector and CWE rather than a confirmed POC.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

Local privilege escalation in Microsoft's Desktop Window Manager (dwm.exe) allows a low-privileged attacker who already has code execution on a Windows system to bring about a type-confusion condition and obtain elevated rights, scored CVSS 3.1 7.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). Because DWM is present and running by default in every interactive Windows desktop session, no special feature or non-default configuration is required to reach the vulnerable code; only a locally executed crafted program is needed. This is a post-compromise escalation primitive rather than a remote entry point, no public exploit identified at time of analysis, and Microsoft's MSRC update-guide entry is the authoritative reference for affected builds and the fix.

RemediationAI

Primary remediation is to apply Microsoft's security update for this CVE; the vendor advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-69926 should be treated as authoritative for the applicable Windows cumulative update (KB) and fixed build numbers, which were not specified in the supplied data - patch status therefore reads as: Patch available per vendor advisory, with the exact fixed version not independently confirmed here. Prioritize this update on multi-user endpoints, RDP/VDI hosts, and shared workstations, where a low-privileged local foothold is most readily obtained and escalation has the greatest blast radius. Because this is a local privilege-escalation primitive rather than a remote entry point, the practical compensating controls are those that shrink the attacker's starting position: enforce application allow-listing with WDAC or AppLocker so unvetted binaries cannot run on the endpoint, standardize users on non-administrative accounts, and monitor EDR telemetry for abnormal dwm.exe behavior, unexpected crashes, or suspicious cross-process handle activity against the compositor. The trade-off of WDAC/AppLocker is non-trivial - it requires audit-mode tuning first and can break unsigned line-of-business or update utilities - and disabling DWM is not a viable mitigation on supported Windows releases because the compositor is required for the desktop to render. There are no meaningful network-layer workarounds for a flaw of this class, so exposure reduction plus prompt patching is the realistic path; until the update is deployed, restrict interactive local logon and untrusted-code execution on high-value hosts where feasible.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 13 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Desktop Window Manager is the Windows compositor that renders window surfaces, manages the graphics/display stack, and runs by default on all desktop Windows installations. The root cause is CWE-843, Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type (type confusion): the component accepts a resource whose runtime type does not match the type expected by the code path handling it, so a locally crafted program can cause memory to be interpreted under the wrong type. Public tagging of this CVE as 'Memory Corruption' and 'Information Disclosure' is consistent with that root cause - a mistyped object can be used to read or corrupt adjacent memory, which in a compositor process is the stepping stone from a low-integrity caller to higher-privileged execution. The assessed vector (AV:L/PR:L/AC:L/UI:N, S:U, C:H/I:H/A:H) means the attacker must already hold a local low-privileged foothold but needs no user interaction and faces low complexity, and successful abuse yields high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact within the same security scope. No CPE strings were supplied in the intelligence feed, so exact affected builds must be taken from the Microsoft MSRC update guide rather than inferred.

Know when Windows 10 1809 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.8 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local-only EOP by a low-privileged user triggering type confusion in a default OS component, yielding SYSTEM-level control, so AV:L/PR:L/AC:L with full C/I/A impact.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:19 nvd
HIGH 7.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Desktop Window Manager allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Microsoft's Desktop Window Manager (dwm.exe) - a component that runs by default in every interactive Windows desktop session - carries a local privilege-escalation flaw that would let an attacker who has already gained a foothold on an endpoint elevate to full administrative rights over that machine. No vendor patch is available yet, so every Windows workstation, server with a desktop experience, and VDI session in the estate is exposed, and the only barrier to exploitation is an attacker's ability to run a crafted program locally. Leadership should view this as a severity multiplier rather than a new entry point: it converts any single compromised user account or low-privilege foothold into a full endpoint takeover, which is why it warrants attention despite requiring a pre-existing compromise.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: enforce least privilege and remove standing local administrator rights so a compromised account cannot leverage the escalation; deploy application allowlisting (WDAC/AppLocker) to block execution of unsigned or unvetted binaries from user-writable locations; enable LSA protection and Credential Guard; apply Defender ASR rules; restrict interactive logon on servers; and monitor for anomalous dwm.exe behaviour, cross-process access, and privilege-escalation patterns via EDR. Apply the vendor patch as soon as Microsoft publishes a fixed version.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 71% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Desktop Window Manager is a core component of all modern Windows installations
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation More Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +39
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2021-1732 HIGH POC
7.8 Feb 25

Windows Win32k contains an out-of-bounds write vulnerability enabling local privilege escalation to SYSTEM, exploited by

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2021-36934 HIGH POC
7.8 Jul 22

Windows contains an elevation of privilege vulnerability known as 'HiveNightmare' or 'SeriousSAM' where overly permissiv

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2024-21412 HIGH POC
8.1 Feb 13

Internet Shortcut Files Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.1), this vulnerability is rem

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy