Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain low-privilege authenticated network access
-
DeliveryLure user to trigger WER action
-
ExploitOverflow heap in Windows Error Reporting
-
ExecutionExecute code in elevated context
-
ImpactAttain full host compromise
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already hold a low-privilege authenticated foothold (PR:L) and to induce user interaction (UI:R) that triggers the vulnerable Windows Error Reporting code path; it is not an unauthenticated, no-interaction remote takeover. The affected component is Windows Error Reporting, present by default across the listed Windows 10/11 and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 builds (including Server Core installations), so no non-default feature needs to be enabled. Limiting factors that reduce real-world risk: the mandatory existing authentication, the required user action, and SSVC's 'Automatable: no' finding, which together make opportunistic or wormable exploitation unlikely. A patch is available from Microsoft; applying the fixed build (per the EUVD version ceilings, e.g. Windows 11 24H2 >=10.0.26100.9445) removes the condition. |
| Impact | This is a moderately serious but not top-tier emergency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 8.0) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity flaw that nonetheless requires an already-authenticated low-privilege attacker (PR:L) AND user interaction (UI:R), both of which meaningfully raise the bar. All three impact metrics are High, consistent with a successful privilege elevation yielding full control of the host, which aligns with the SSVC 'Technical Impact: total' rating. Crucially, the exploitation signals point AWAY from urgent mass exploitation: SSVC reports 'Exploitation: none' and 'Automatable: no', there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC is referenced - so this is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. No EPSS score was provided in the input, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified here. One point worth verifying: the vulnerability is a privilege-elevation bug yet carries AV:N (network attack vector) - this network-based EoP pattern is plausible for Windows Error Reporting but the combination of 'over a network' with an EoP outcome should be confirmed against the Microsoft advisory to understand the exact remote-triggering path. Net assessment: patch on a normal prioritized cadence (it is a privileged-access, totally-impactful Windows flaw) but it does not currently meet the bar for drop-everything emergency response given the authentication requirement, user-interaction requirement, and absence of any observed or automatable exploitation. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A low-privileged but authenticated attacker on the network crafts malicious input that reaches the Windows Error Reporting component and induces a user action (UI:R) that triggers the heap-based buffer overflow. Successful corruption of heap memory lets the attacker execute code in an elevated context, elevating from a limited account to full control of the host. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and SSVC rates exploitation as 'none' and not automatable. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026
Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Error Reporting (WER) lets an authenticated attacker who already holds a low-privilege foothold - and who can induce a victim to interact with the vulnerable reporting path - corrupt heap memory and elevate privileges, with high impact to confidentiality, integrity and availability. The 8.0 score is driven by CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, so this is explicitly not an unauthenticated, no-interaction remote takeover: a prior foothold (PR:L) and user action (UI:R) are both required. Microsoft has shipped fixed builds and CISA's SSVC assessment records Exploitation: none and Automatable: no, so no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis; this is a moderately serious but not top-tier emergency, and the practical risk is further dampened by the mandatory existing authentication and the required user interaction.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: Microsoft has published fixed builds, and the EUVD version ceilings identify the minimum patched levels - Windows 11 24H2 10.0.26100.9445, Windows 11 25H2 10.0.26200.9445, Windows 11 23H2 10.0.22631.7582, Windows 11 26H1 10.0.28000.2954, Windows 10 22H2 10.0.19045.7725, Windows 10 21H2 10.0.19044.7725, Windows 10 1809 and Server 2019 10.0.17763.9245, Windows 10 1607 and Server 2016 10.0.14393.9512, Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.5622, Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.33438, Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.26349, and Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.23398 - so standard monthly servicing or the applicable cumulative update from https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-69363 is the primary and preferred fix. Where immediate patching is not possible, the exploitable precondition is an authenticated attacker plus a user action that drives a crafted error-report payload into the WER pipeline, so compensating controls should target that path: disable Windows Error Reporting host-wide via Group Policy ('Disable Windows Error Reporting' / DisableWindowsErrorReporting registry value under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\Windows Error Reporting) or stop and disable the Windows Error Reporting Service, accepting the trade-off that crash telemetry, automated crash-dump collection and vendor diagnostics are lost and that other applications relying on WER fault reporting may behave differently; alternatively restrict outbound and inbound access to WER reporting endpoints and corporate error-reporting servers at the network boundary, understanding that this does not remove the vulnerable binaries locally and only blocks the delivery vector, and that internal report queues may still be reachable. Because exploitation requires an existing low-privilege account, tightening who can authenticate to managed endpoints and reducing the attack surface available to those accounts provides defense in depth, but none of these workarounds is a substitute for applying the fixed builds. There is no indication of active exploitation (CISA KEV does not list this CVE and SSVC records Exploitation: none, Automatable: no), so remediation can proceed on a normal risk-based patch cadence rather than under emergency-change conditions.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 19 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-122, a heap-based buffer overflow: memory allocated on the heap is written past its bounds because a length or size value is not validated before a copy operation. The affected component is Windows Error Reporting, the built-in crash and fault telemetry subsystem (werfault.exe, WerSvc and the report-queue handling in the Windows Error Reporting service) that collects fault data, packages it into report payloads, and forwards them to Microsoft or to a corporate error-reporting server. Because error reports can traverse the network (AV:N), a crafted or malformed report payload reaching the vulnerable parsing path can trigger the overflow; the heap corruption is then usable to elevate the attacker's privileges within the same security scope (S:U, no scope change). The component ships by default on every listed Windows 10/11 and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 build - including Server Core installations - so no non-default feature must be enabled for the vulnerable code to be present. The independent assessment confirms the assessed vector precisely and notes the limiting factors: the pre-existing authenticated foothold, mandatory user interaction, and SSVC's Automatable: no finding, which together make wormable or opportunistic mass exploitation unlikely.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-reachable per vendor description (AV:N), low complexity, but requires an existing low-privilege account (PR:L) and user interaction (UI:R); successful heap overflow yields full host control (C/I/A:H).
Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).
CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Error Reporting allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Executive ViewAI
A heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Error Reporting (WER) allows an actor who already holds a low-privilege foothold on a Windows host to escalate to higher privileges - potentially full system control - if they can persuade a user to interact with the affected reporting workflow. Because WER ships by default across supported Windows versions, the population of potentially exposed systems is large, but the attack is not a remote takeover: it requires both an existing breach and user action, and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis. Leadership should treat this as a containment and patch-hygiene priority that limits how far an existing intrusion can spread, rather than an imminent external threat requiring emergency action.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
EUVD-2026-99091
GHSA-hhjm-gcgj-3r59
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB