Skip to main content

Windows Graphics Component CVE-2026-69326

| EUVDEUVD-2026-99899 HIGH
Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122)
2026-10-13 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-xv6q-wj8h-75cv
8.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Craft malicious font payload
  2. Delivery
    Deliver via document/web/email
  3. Exploit
    Victim opens content
  4. Execution
    Trigger heap overflow in font parser
  5. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code in user context

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the victim to open or render attacker-controlled content containing a malformed font processed by the Windows Graphics/Fonts subsystem - e.g., a document, email, or web page that embeds the crafted font. The limiting factor is the mandatory user interaction (CVSS UI:R): there is no server-side or unattended trigger, so the attacker must socially engineer the victim into opening the content. No authentication is required (PR:N) and no special non-default configuration is indicated; the affected font-parsing code path is present in default installations of all listed Windows client and server builds. Code executes in the context of the user who opens the content, so running as a low-privilege/standard user limits the immediate blast radius.

Impact

Signals are consistent in severity but divergent on urgency. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 8.8) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated code-execution flaw whose only gating factor is required user interaction (UI:R) - the hallmark of a font-parsing bug triggered when a victim opens attacker-supplied content. CISA SSVC, however, tempers this: Exploitation is rated 'none' (no observed or public exploitation), Automatable 'no' (the UI:R requirement prevents scripted mass-exploitation/wormability), while Technical Impact is 'total,' matching the C:H/I:H/A:H full-compromise profile. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or public POC was supplied in the input, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. Net: this is a genuinely high-impact, high-priority patch for any Windows estate because of total technical impact and the enormous installed base, but it is NOT currently an emergency drive-by threat - exploitation requires luring a user to open malicious content, and no active exploitation or automation is evidenced. Priority should be driven by prevalence and impact, not by any confirmed in-the-wild signal, which is absent.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker crafts a malicious font (or a document/web page embedding one) and delivers it via email attachment, a web page, or a shared file. When the victim opens the content, the Windows Graphics/Fonts component parses the malformed font and triggers a heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122), allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code in the victim's context. No public exploit was identified in the provided data, and user interaction is required for the attack to succeed.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.6% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 14, 2026

Heap-based buffer overflow in the Windows Graphics/Fonts subsystem (CVE-2026-69326) lets remote attackers execute arbitrary code on affected Windows client and server systems when a victim opens or renders content containing a malformed embedded font. All Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 builds listed in the advisory are affected, and the vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) with a total technical impact rating under CISA's SSVC framework. Exploitation is gated by mandatory user interaction - there is no unattended or server-side trigger - and there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no CISA KEV listing, so while severity signals are consistent, urgency signals diverge.

RemediationAI

Apply the Microsoft security update referenced in the MSRC advisory (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-69326); patch status is 'Patch available per vendor advisory' and remediation should bring each platform to at least its fixed build - Windows 10 1607/Server 2016 to 10.0.14393.9612, Windows 10 1809/Server 2019 to 10.0.17763.9376, Windows 10 21H2/22H2 to 10.0.19044.7807, Windows 11 23H2 to 10.0.22631.7652, Windows 11 24H2 and Windows Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.9711 and 10.0.26100.33650 respectively, Windows 11 25H2 to 10.0.26200.9711, Windows 11 26H1 to 10.0.28000.3231, Windows 11 26H2 to 10.0.26300.9711, Windows Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5761, Windows Server 2012 to 6.2.9200.26434, and Windows Server 2012 R2 to 6.3.9600.23470. Where patching must be staged, enable Windows untrusted-font blocking so fonts not installed under %windir%\Fonts are refused (trade-off: applications and documents relying on embedded or user-supplied fonts will render incorrectly or fail), force untrusted Office documents and email attachments into Protected View and strip embedded fonts at the mail/document gateway (trade-off: reduced fidelity for legitimate documents), and have users open untrusted content only as standard users rather than administrators to limit the blast radius of any successful code execution. Note that these are compensating controls only; because exploitation is triggered by rendering attacker-supplied font content, there is no network-port or service-permission workaround that fully removes the risk.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5761
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26434
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.3231
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9612
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 26H2 10.0.26300.0 <10.0.26300.9711
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9376
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9711
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23470
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33650
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7652
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7807
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9711

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7807
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7652
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9711
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9711
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.3231
euvd windows_11_version_26h2 fix: 10.0.26300.9711
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23470
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26434
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9612
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9376
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5761
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33650
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33650

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 20 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause class is CWE-122, a heap-based buffer overflow in the font parsing path of the Windows graphics stack. Font files (TrueType/OpenType and related embedded-font containers) are parsed by privileged graphics code that reads attacker-influenced table lengths and offsets; when those lengths are trusted without adequate bounds checking during heap allocation, out-of-bounds writes can occur, corrupting adjacent heap metadata and enabling controlled memory corruption that can be turned into code execution in the context of the parsing process. Font parsing has long been a high-value attack surface because fonts are embedded in documents, email messages, and web pages and are rendered automatically by many applications, and because the parsing code runs inside the user's session where graphics libraries are loaded. Per NVD and ENISA EUVD data, the affected component is shipped in default installations of Windows 10 (1607, 1809, 21H2, 22H2), Windows 11 (23H2, 24H2, 25H2, 26H1, 26H2), and Windows Server 2012, 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022, and 2025, including Server Core installations; no CPE strings were supplied, so scoping must rely on the build-based version ranges in the advisory. The assessed vector (PR:N, UI:R) indicates an unauthenticated remote attacker who must convince a victim to render crafted content; code execution occurs with the privileges of the user who opens it.

Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Malicious font delivered over the network but needs a victim to open it, so AV:N/PR:N/UI:R; a heap overflow yielding code execution gives full C:H/I:H/A:H.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 13, 2026 - 20:20 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 13, 2026 - 19:18 cve.org
HIGH 8.8

DescriptionCVE.org

Heap-based buffer overflow in Graphic Fonts allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A memory-corruption vulnerability in the Windows graphics and font rendering component exposes the full managed Windows estate - Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 - to remote code execution, and a vendor patch is now available. Exploitation is unauthenticated but gated by user interaction, meaning the realistic attack path runs through email attachments, document previews, and web-rendered content, placing document-heavy and browsing-heavy user populations at greatest risk rather than unattended server workloads. Leadership should treat this as a high-priority, broadly applicable patching obligation: no public exploit code or active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis, so the divergence between the high severity score and the current absence of exploitation activity should drive scheduled urgency rather than emergency response.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.6%
Top 51% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Microsoft Windows OS and server editions, present in nearly all enterprises
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.6%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

45
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

CVE-2025-52691 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 29

Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio

CVE-2019-0803 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 09

Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in

CVE-2020-1472 MEDIUM POC
5.5 Aug 17

A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr

CVE-2025-33053 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables

CVE-2025-33073 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 10

Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker

CVE-2025-13315 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b

CVE-2013-10047 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 01

An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote

CVE-2012-10030 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Aug 05

FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit

CVE-2025-34101 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio

CVE-2025-13316 HIGH POC
8.2 Nov 19

Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred

CVE-2025-34095 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 10

Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/

CVE-2025-11953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 03

React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy