Skip to main content

OpenEXR CVE-2026-68516

MEDIUM
Stack-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-121)
2026-08-24 security-advisories@github.com
6.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: github
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Craft EXR with malformed JPEG 2000 SIZ tile geometry
  2. Delivery
    Deliver file to target user or automated pipeline
  3. Exploit
    Target application decodes HTJ2K-compressed EXR
  4. Execution
    OpenJPH AVX2 decoder computes invalid tile/codeblock dimensions
  5. Persist
    Stack out-of-bounds write triggered
  6. Impact
    Application process crashes

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Stack buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires that the target system runs OpenEXR version 3.4.0 through 3.4.13 with HTJ2K compression support compiled in - this code path was introduced in 3.4.0 and is not present in earlier versions. The crafted file must be processed through the HTJ2K decode path specifically; EXR files using other compression types do not trigger the vulnerable code. The CVSS UI:R metric indicates a user or automated process must open and attempt to decode the file. Limiting factors include: the need to deliver a file to a decoding context, the UI:R interaction requirement reducing automatable mass exploitation, and the impact being limited to process crash with no code execution or data exposure. Systems that do not process HTJ2K-compressed EXR files, or that pre-filter EXR compression attributes before decoding, are not exposed.

Impact

The CVSS 6.5 score with vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H is consistent with the described attack model: network delivery of a malicious file with no authentication required, but a user or automated process must trigger the decode. The UI:R factor meaningfully constrains opportunistic mass exploitation; however, media ingestion pipelines, render farms, and digital content creation tooling that automatically process incoming EXR assets may fulfill this requirement without explicit user interaction, reducing the practical barrier. No EPSS score was provided in the input data, and the CVE does not appear in CISA KEV, indicating no confirmed active exploitation at time of analysis. Impact is strictly a denial of service - the stack corruption crashes the decoding process with no confidentiality or integrity consequence reported. The combination of no KEV listing, no POC, UI:R, and availability-only impact suggests this is a medium-priority patch item for most organizations, though studios and post-production facilities with automated EXR ingest pipelines should prioritize the upgrade to 3.4.14 promptly given their attack surface.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker crafts a malicious EXR file with a JPEG 2000 SIZ marker that specifies a tile-grid offset placing the first tile entirely outside the visible image canvas, then delivers it to a target user or automated media ingestion pipeline running OpenEXR 3.4.0-3.4.13. When the HTJ2K code path in the OpenJPH AVX2 decoder processes the file, it computes invalid tile and codeblock geometry and performs a stack out-of-bounds write, crashing the host application. No public proof-of-concept exploit has been identified, but the attack surface is file delivery to any system that decodes HTJ2K-compressed EXR input.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 24, 2026

Stack-based out-of-bounds write in OpenEXR's HTJ2K decode path allows remote attackers to crash applications that process crafted EXR image files. Affected are OpenEXR versions 3.4.0 through 3.4.13, where the vendored OpenJPH AVX2 decoder fails to reject JPEG 2000 SIZ marker geometries in which the first tile does not intersect the visible image, leading to invalid codeblock computation and a stack memory corruption that terminates the process. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; a vendor-released patch is available in version 3.4.14.

RemediationAI

Upgrade to OpenEXR 3.4.14, the first release containing the fix, as confirmed by commits 45521f92104373b5c850f27f2d4659ab6759e848 and 85009d840cc085aa96ad03ae76fa6463defeb0e5 referenced in the GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-fw66-6xph-56jm (https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr/security/advisories/GHSA-fw66-6xph-56jm). For deployments that cannot immediately upgrade, a targeted workaround is to reject or quarantine EXR files using HTJ2K compression before they reach the decoder - this can be implemented by inspecting the EXR compression attribute at the application layer and refusing files with compression type 10 (HTJ2K). Note that this workaround disables HTJ2K-compressed EXR processing entirely, which may impact workflows that legitimately use that compression format. Wrapping image-decoding processes in a sandboxed subprocess limits crash impact to the sandbox but does not prevent the DoS condition itself.

Affected ProductsAI

OpenEXR versions 3.4.0 through 3.4.13, as maintained by the Academy Software Foundation under the AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr GitHub repository, are affected. The vulnerable component is the HTJ2K decode path using the vendored OpenJPH library. No CPE strings were included in the provided input data; affected software is identified by the GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-fw66-6xph-56jm at https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr/security/advisories/GHSA-fw66-6xph-56jm. Version 3.4.14 is the first fixed release.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

OpenEXR is the reference implementation for the EXR high dynamic range image format, maintained by the Academy Software Foundation. Starting with version 3.4.0, it introduced support for HTJ2K (High Throughput JPEG 2000) compression via a vendored copy of the OpenJPH library, which includes an AVX2-accelerated decoder for x86_64 platforms. The JPEG 2000 SIZ (Image and Tile Size) marker segment defines image origin, dimensions, tile size, and tile-grid offset. OpenEXR's HTJ2K path validates the decoded codestream dimensions against EXR chunk sizes but does not enforce that the computed first tile actually intersects the image canvas. When a crafted SIZ field produces a tile-grid geometry where no tile touches the visible image, the decoder derives invalid tile and codeblock dimensions, writing to stack memory beyond its allocated buffer region. This is classified as CWE-121 (Stack-based Buffer Overflow). The root cause is an incomplete geometry-validity check in the input parsing layer, not an AVX2 instruction fault, though the AVX2 path is identified in the commit diff as the affected code path.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (github) PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

File must be actively opened or processed by a user or pipeline (UI:R); no authentication required; impact is process crash only, so C:N and I:N with A:H.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE MEDIUM
Red Hat 6.5 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (github).

CVSS VectorVendor: github

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

OpenEXR is the reference implementation and specification for the EXR image format, widely used in the motion picture industry. From version 3.4.0 through 3.4.13, a crafted HTJ2K-compressed EXR can crash OpenEXR during normal decode. An HTJ2K-compressed EXR whose JPEG 2000 SIZ fields place the first tile outside the visible image can reach invalid tile and codeblock geometry in the vendored OpenJPH AVX2 decoder, causing a stack out-of-bounds write and denial of service. OpenEXR's HTJ2K path validates the decoded codestream dimensions against the EXR chunk size, but it does not reject SIZ image-offset/tile-grid geometry where the first tile does not intersect the image. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.14.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 84% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
widely used in VFX and motion picture industry production pipelines
Data Quality
7 sources
Confidence: High
NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment Vendor GitHub VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A stack-based buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a buffer located on the stack than it was allocated to hold.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Moderate
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Desktop Applications 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy