Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessRun malicious app on macOS
-
DeliverySend oversized input to vulnerable component
-
ExploitTrigger buffer overflow past size check
-
ExecutionCorrupt memory and panic system
-
ImpactUnexpected system termination (DoS)
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, buffer size validation
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to already be able to execute a malicious or compromised application locally on the macOS host (consistent with AV:L and 'An app may be able to...'); it is not remotely reachable. The specific API or system component that performs the insufficient size validation is not named by Apple. Limiting factors: the attacker needs an app running on the device (so initial access/code execution is a prerequisite), impact is confined to availability (unexpected system termination/DoS) with no data disclosure or modification, and running a fully patched build (macOS 27, 15.8, or 26.7) removes the flaw. |
| Impact | This is a moderate, low-priority issue that the combined signals consistently rate as such - there is no conflict between sources. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H, base 5.5) describes a locally-exploitable availability-only flaw: an attacker must already be running code on the machine (a malicious or compromised app) and the only outcome is unexpected system termination (a crash/DoS), with no confidentiality or integrity impact and no scope change. All corroborating signals point the same direction: EPSS is very low at 0.21% (11th percentile), the CVE is NOT on CISA KEV, no public exploit code was identified, and CISA SSVC scores Exploitation=none, Automatable=no, Technical Impact=partial. There is no data conflict to flag - the CVSS local vector, the 'An app may be able to...' description, and the SSVC 'none/no/partial' decision all agree this is a local denial-of-service requiring prior code execution, not a remotely weaponizable critical. The practical priority is low: patch in the normal maintenance cycle. The only limiting nuance worth verifying is the exact privilege level the triggering 'app' needs, which the description does not specify beyond requiring local app execution. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A user installs or is tricked into running a malicious application (or an already-present app is compromised); the app issues a crafted request that overflows an undersized buffer in a macOS system component. Because size validation was insufficient, the overflow corrupts memory and forces an unexpected system termination (kernel panic or service crash), denying availability. No public exploit code was identified at time of analysis, and because CVSS is AV:L the attacker must already have local code execution on the target. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 20, 2026
Unexpected system termination can be triggered in Apple macOS by a locally running malicious or compromised app that exploits insufficient size validation in an unnamed system component, affecting versions prior to macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7, and macOS Golden Gate 27. This is a local-only availability flaw rated CVSS 5.5 with a low EPSS score of 0.21% (11th percentile); no public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation was identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: update to macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7, or macOS Golden Gate 27 as applicable, using the Apple advisories at https://support.apple.com/en-us/149035, https://support.apple.com/en-us/149042, and https://support.apple.com/en-us/149043. Because exploitation requires a malicious or compromised app already running locally, interim risk reduction should focus on preventing execution of untrusted software through Gatekeeper and notarization enforcement, application allowlisting, and use of standard rather than administrative accounts; the trade-off is administrative overhead and possible blocking of legitimate but unapproved applications. Network-level controls are not an effective mitigation because the issue is local and not remotely reachable, and no vendor workaround beyond patching was identified in the provided data.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is classified as CWE-119, improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer, and Apple addressed it through improved size validation. The CVSS vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H confirms that exploitation is local, requires low attack complexity and privileges, needs no user interaction, and affects only availability, with no confidentiality or integrity impact and no scope change. The CPE entry cpe:2.3:a:apple:macos:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* indicates a broad Apple macOS product match, while EUVD version ranges narrow the affected releases to macOS before 15.8, before 26.7, and before 27. The specific API or system component that performs the insufficient size validation is not named by Apple, but the impact is consistent with a locally executed app causing a denial-of-service condition through an out-of-bounds memory operation.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Requires a locally-running app so AV:L/PR:L; no user interaction; impact is only unexpected system termination, so C:N/I:N/A:H with unchanged scope.
Primary rating from Vendor (apple).
CVSS VectorVendor: apple
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
A buffer overflow was addressed with improved size validation. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7. An app may be able to cause unexpected system termination.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
EUVD-2026-104702
GHSA-ccf9-2h59-jh67
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB