Skip to main content

EasyIO NEO CVE-2026-64893

| EUVDEUVD-2026-91074 HIGH
Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information (CWE-319)
2026-10-01 jci GHSA-7qm5-3w7w-vwh7
7.3
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: jci
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain network-adjacent position on BMS segment
  2. Exploit
    Intercept controller communication path (MITM)
  3. Execution
    Capture cleartext sensitive data
  4. Impact
    Reuse harvested credentials/data against controller

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V12 - Secure Communication Transport encryption
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to achieve a man-in-the-middle position on the network path used by EasyIO NEO (versions before 3.3b25), because sensitive information is transmitted without encryption (CWE-319). Limiting factors per the CVSS 4.0 vector: HIGH attack complexity (AC:H) and a present attack requirement (AT:P) mean the attacker must control or intercept the communication channel; low privileges (PR:L) are needed; and user/passive interaction (UI:P) is required, so a victim-side transmission must occur for sensitive data to be captured. This is not remote-unauthenticated exploitation against default configurations - it is gated by network positioning and interaction.

Impact

This is a moderate, context-dependent risk rather than a top-tier emergency. The only severity signal provided is a vendor-supplied (jci/Johnson Controls) CVSS 4.0 base score of 7.3 with vector AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P - meaning that while the vector is network-reachable, exploitation carries HIGH attack complexity (AC:H), a specific attack requirement (AT:P), requires low-level privileges (PR:L), and depends on user/passive interaction (UI:P). These modifiers collectively indicate a non-trivial, situational attack - consistent with a man-in-the-middle (CWE-319 cleartext transmission) scenario where the attacker must already occupy a privileged network position on the path between victim endpoints. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no proof-of-concept were provided, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active or widespread exploitation. Note a tension worth flagging: AV:N implies remote reachability, but a cleartext/MITM flaw realistically requires network-adjacent interception positioning, which is why AC:H is appropriate - the 'network' vector does not mean trivial internet-wide exploitation. Given EasyIO NEO is a niche building-automation/HVAC controller rather than ubiquitous software, this should be prioritized by operators of affected OT/BMS environments but does not warrant emergency cross-industry response.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has gained a foothold on the same operational-technology/building-automation network segment as an EasyIO NEO controller positions themselves as a man-in-the-middle on the communication path. Because sensitive information is transmitted in cleartext, the attacker passively intercepts or actively relays traffic to capture credentials or configuration data exchanged with the controller. No public exploit code was identified, and the attack requires both a privileged network position and victim-side interaction, limiting opportunistic use.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: Active threat signals + CRITICAL/HIGH severity.
Patch available 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 01, 2026

Cleartext transmission of sensitive information in Johnson Controls EasyIO NEO (all versions before 3.3b25) lets an attacker who has already achieved a man-in-the-middle position on the network path read data the controller exchanges without encryption. It is rated 7.3 under CVSS 4.0 and mapped to CWE-319, but exploitation is gated rather than trivial: the assessed vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R, consistent with the CVSS 4.0 AC:H, AT:P, PR:L, UI:P values) requires channel control or interception, low privileges on the attacker side, and a victim-side transmission to occur. There is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, making this a moderate, context-dependent risk rather than an emergency, and impact is primarily confidentiality loss with limited integrity/availability effects.

RemediationAI

The primary fix is to upgrade EasyIO NEO firmware to 3.3b25 or later, the version boundary the vendor advisory uses to delimit the affected range ("before 3.3b25"), and to verify the installed build on each controller after flashing; consult the Johnson Controls advisory at https://www.johnsoncontrols.com/trust-center/cybersecurity/security-advisories for the authoritative release notes. Where immediate firmware updates are not possible, the effective compensating control is to remove the attacker's ability to reach the man-in-the-middle position: place NEO controllers and their management/engineering workstations on a dedicated, tightly firewalled OT VLAN, and tunnel all management, engineering and telemetry traffic through an encrypted overlay (IPsec, WireGuard or an equivalent VPN/SSH tunnel) so the cleartext hop is never observable. The trade-off is added latency and complexity in the OT path plus the need to manage tunnel keys on constrained devices; additionally, disable or restrict untrusted management interfaces (for example, block direct HTTP/web access from anything other than an engineering jump host) and enable port security, DHCP snooping and dynamic ARP inspection at the access layer to blunt the spoofing techniques used to obtain the interception position, accepting that legacy switches may not support these features. Because a MITM requires physical or logical adjacency, minimizing flat L2 domains and auditing for rogue devices or mirrored ports is a high-value secondary step; monitoring for replayed or re-used credentials captured from cleartext sessions should accompany any interim control until 3.3b25 is deployed.

Affected VersionsENISA

EasyIO NEO 0 <3.3b25

Affected Packages

euvd easyio_neo fix: 3.3b25

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

EasyIO NEO is a Johnson Controls building-automation/edge controller platform (CPE cpe:2.3:a:johnson_controls:easyio_neo:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*), the kind of device that sits between field equipment and supervisory building management systems and therefore handles credentials, configuration, telemetry and control traffic. The root cause is CWE-319, Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information: rather than a memory-safety or injection bug, the product sends sensitive data over a channel that is not protected by transport encryption, so any party able to observe or relay that traffic can recover it. In OT/IoT/building-automation networks this is typically reached through ARP or DNS spoofing, rogue access points, mirror ports, or compromised intermediate switches/routers; the HIGH attack complexity and present attack requirement in the CVSS 4.0 vector reflect that this positioning is a prerequisite, not something the vulnerability itself provides. Because the resulting exposure is disclosure (plus possible downstream integrity/availability effects through reuse of recovered secrets), the weakness is best addressed by adding transport-layer protection (TLS/VPN/IPsec) and by network segmentation rather than by input validation.

Know when Easyio Neo gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (jci) PRIMARY 7.3 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
vuln.today AI 5.4 MEDIUM

MITM interception of cleartext data needs a privileged network position (AC:H) and a victim transmission (UI:R); primary impact is confidentiality (C:H) with limited integrity tampering and no availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (jci).

CVSS VectorVendor: jci

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Attack Requirements
Present
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
Passive
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
High
Subsequent system: Integrity
High
Subsequent system: Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 01, 2026 - 22:18 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 01, 2026 - 21:25 cve.org
HIGH 7.3

DescriptionCVE.org

  • Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information vulnerability in Johnson Controls EasyIO NEO allows - Man In the Middle Attack.

This issue affects EasyIO NEO: before 3.3b25.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Johnson Controls EasyIO NEO building controllers running any version before 3.3b25 exchange sensitive data across the network without encryption, so an attacker who has already established a man-in-the-middle position on that path can read it. Exploitation is gated rather than trivial - it requires the attacker to already hold a position of low privilege on the channel plus a victim-side transmission - and there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, making this a context-dependent confidentiality risk rather than an emergency. Leadership should care because these controllers typically sit in building automation and OT environments where unencrypted traffic reaches supervisory systems that manage physical facilities, and no vendor-released patch has been identified.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: isolate EasyIO NEO controllers on a dedicated, segmented OT VLAN restricted to explicitly authorized hosts; replace cleartext communication with encrypted and authenticated transport (IPsec, TLS, or VPN) between controller and supervisory system; enforce port security and 802.1X on access switches; remove or encrypt remote-access paths to the controllers; and monitor OT segments for ARP spoofing and other man-in-the-middle activity.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 98% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche building-automation/HVAC controller, industry-specific OT deployment
Threat Intel
1
1 source
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available Yes
Active threat Yes
Deciding rule
Active threat signals + CRITICAL/HIGH severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

46
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: +10
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Threat IntelligenceMISP

CISA Advisories
Sources: CISA (public domain)

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy