Skip to main content

OpenSSL CVE-2026-63075

| EUVDEUVD-2026-65485 HIGH
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770)
2026-08-25 openssl-security@openssl.org GHSA-cj75-r57j-r5v8
High
Disputed · 7.5 Vendor: openssl
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Identify OpenSSL QUIC endpoint
  2. Delivery
    Complete QUIC handshake (no auth required)
  3. Exploit
    Send repeated PING frames to elicit ACK-only responses
  4. Execution
    Withhold acknowledgments for ack-eliciting packets
  5. Persist
    Force unbounded ACK-only metadata accumulation in ACKM
  6. Impact
    Exhaust server memory causing DoS

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Resource allocation limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Impact

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

The target must be running OpenSSL 3.4.0-3.4.6, 3.5.0-3.5.7, 3.6.0-3.6.3, or 4.0.0-4.0.1 with the QUIC stack actively in use - TLS-only deployments are not affected. The attacker must be able to reach the QUIC UDP port and successfully complete a QUIC handshake, meaning the endpoint must be network-accessible without connection-level authentication barriers prior to handshake completion. Post-handshake, no credentials or elevated session state are required. Impact scales with attack duration and concurrency: a single short-lived connection produces negligible memory growth, while sustained connections or high-concurrency scenarios are required to reach service-affecting exhaustion. Exploitation is limited to: (1) QUIC-enabled OpenSSL versions in the affected range, (2) UDP endpoints reachable by the attacker, and (3) sufficient connection persistence to accumulate meaningful memory pressure.

Impact

The CVSS 7.5 High vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) accurately characterizes a network-reachable, zero-authentication DoS with no confidentiality or integrity impact; these metrics align with the description's post-handshake trigger requiring no special privileges. SSVC rates the attack as automatable with partial technical impact and no current exploitation, which is internally consistent - the absence of KEV listing and POC confirms this is not yet weaponized but is mechanically straightforward to script. EPSS data is not available in the provided input and cannot be cited. Practical risk is significantly gated by QUIC adoption: OpenSSL's QUIC stack was introduced in 3.2 and real-world QUIC server deployments using OpenSSL (versus alternatives like quiche or msquic) are still maturing, reducing population-level blast radius compared to a TLS vulnerability. However, affected QUIC endpoints are directly exposed to exploitation without any user interaction or elevated privileges, and sustained or concurrent connections accelerate memory exhaustion, making this a genuine operational risk for environments actively serving QUIC traffic.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker directs a script to open many concurrent QUIC connections to an OpenSSL-based server (e.g., a reverse proxy or application server with QUIC enabled), completing the handshake on each, then continuously transmitting PING frames to force ACK-only responses while deliberately withholding its own acknowledgments. Over time, each connection accumulates unreleased ACK-only packet metadata in the server's QUIC ACK manager, progressively consuming heap memory until the server process is terminated by the OS OOM killer or becomes unresponsive. No public exploit code exists at time of analysis, but the attack mechanism is mechanically straightforward to implement from the public description.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.5% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 25, 2026

Memory exhaustion in OpenSSL's QUIC stack allows any remote peer that completes a QUIC handshake to cause unbounded connection-scoped memory growth by sending repeated PING frames while withholding acknowledgments for ack-eliciting packets. Affected versions span OpenSSL 3.4.0 through early 4.0.x; TLS-only deployments and the FIPS module are unaffected. No public exploit code exists and SSVC confirms no active exploitation at time of analysis, though the attack is rated automatable (CVSS AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N), making concurrent-connection amplification straightforward.

RemediationAI

Upgrade to a fixed release as confirmed by vendor advisory (https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260825.txt): OpenSSL 3.4.7, 3.5.8, 3.6.4, or 4.0.2 depending on the active release branch. The upstream fix is distributed across four commits (7308946576b12e64b8be53bcf0a120354b2b42bc, 7c98d79738549df92868e7dd9be4bbf061eed709, bf84721c2548351176e367e6de505792f0118dc6, c902e5f16d6a9e130e96d3ca6d8f64d71652e393). If immediate patching is not feasible, operators exposing QUIC endpoints to untrusted networks should implement connection-rate limiting at the load-balancer or firewall layer to restrict the number of concurrent QUIC connections from individual peers; this reduces but does not eliminate the attack surface. Alternatively, disabling QUIC at the ingress layer (if the application supports fallback to TLS/TCP) eliminates the vulnerability entirely but introduces latency trade-offs for clients that rely on QUIC's 0-RTT handshake and multiplexing benefits. Applications using OpenSSL solely for TLS require no action.

Affected VersionsENISA

OpenSSL 3.5.0 <3.5.8
OpenSSL 3.6.0 <3.6.4
OpenSSL 4.0.0 <4.0.2
OpenSSL 3.4.0 <3.4.7

Affected Packages

euvd openssl fix: 3.4.7, 3.5.8, 3.6.4, 4.0.2

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

OpenSSL's QUIC ACK manager (OSSL_ACKM, implemented in ssl/quic/quic_ackm.c) maintains a per-packet-space transmission history to support loss detection and retransmission. The QUIC protocol does not require peers to acknowledge ACK-only packets (packets containing only ACK frames are not ack-eliciting), yet the vulnerable implementation stored full packet metadata for them anyway via ossl_ackm_on_tx_packet(). A malicious peer exploits this by sending PING frames - which the QUIC spec requires the recipient to respond to with ACKs - forcing ACK-only transmissions from the OpenSSL peer, while suppressing its own acknowledgments to prevent the history from being pruned. CWE-770 (Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling) is the correct root cause class: no upper bound was enforced on ACK-only packet metadata retained in the tx_pkt_history_st structure. The fix, visible in the provided commit diffs, introduces ossl_ackm_on_tx_ack_only_packet() which updates only the highest_sent watermark rather than storing the full packet record, and txp_pkt_is_ack_only() to classify such packets before dispatching to FIFD.

Know when OpenSSL gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Sources disagree (Low–High)
Vendor (openssl) PRIMARY 7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.5 HIGH

Network-reachable QUIC endpoint, handshake completion is the only prerequisite (PR:N), no confidentiality or integrity impact - pure availability DoS consistent with description.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE 5.3 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Red Hat 7.5 LOW

vuln.today treats the vendor’s rating as authoritative. A higher third-party CVSS (e.g. CISA-ADP) is shown for transparency but does not drive the headline severity.

CVSS VectorVendor: openssl

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

4
CVSS changed
Aug 25, 2026 - 15:22 NVD
7.5 (None) 7.5 (HIGH)
Patch available
Aug 25, 2026 - 15:01 EUVD
CVE Published
Aug 25, 2026 - 13:19 cve.org
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)
CVE Published
Aug 25, 2026 - 13:19 cve.org
HIGH 7.5

DescriptionCVE.org

Issue summary: When OpenSSL processes QUIC traffic from a peer that repeatedly sends ack-eliciting packets while not acknowledging ACK-only responses, the QUIC stack can retain ACK-only packet metadata for the lifetime of the connection.

Impact summary: A remote peer that can complete a QUIC handshake can cause connection-scoped memory growth which may lead to Denial of Service through memory exhaustion, especially with sustained traffic or many concurrent QUIC connections.

CWE: CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

Description: When the OpenSSL QUIC stack sends an ACK-only packet, there is no requirement by the QUIC protocol that the peer will acknowledge that ACK-only packet (i.e. it is itself not ack-eliciting). However, the OpenSSL implementation stores the metadata about the ACK frames regardless. In and of itself that's ok, but if a malicious peer establishes a connection, and then drives the connection such that ACK-only packets are forced from the OpenSSL implementation peer (i.e., by sending numerous PING frames), and then withholding any subsequent acks for ack-eliciting data, like legitimate data, said malicious peer can force inappropriate memory growth on the OpenSSL peer, potentially leading to a Denial of Service.

The fix is to ensure that we account for the transmission of the ACK-only packet in the packet histories high and low watermark without actually storing the ACK-only packet metadata itself.

FIPS impact: no The OpenSSL FIPS module is not affected as the QUIC code is outside the FIPS module boundary.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

OpenSSL QUIC implementations in versions 3.4.0 through 4.0.x are vulnerable to unauthenticated remote denial-of-service attacks that can crash QUIC services by exhausting server memory. Organizations relying on QUIC for load balancing, API gateways, or edge delivery require immediate vendor patching to prevent service outages. Traditional TLS-only deployments are not affected.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.5%
Top 61% exploitable
Prevalence
High
widely deployed enterprise library, but QUIC path narrows exposure
Data Quality
8 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment MSRC Vendor GitHub VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.5%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

38
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2014-0160 HIGH POC
7.5 Apr 07

The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packe

CVE-2021-3711 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 24

In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the API function EVP_PKEY_decrypt(). Rated cri

CVE-2014-0195 MEDIUM POC
6.8 Jun 05

The dtls1_reassemble_fragment function in d1_both.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0

CVE-2014-0224 HIGH POC
7.4 Jun 05

OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCiph

CVE-2016-0800 MEDIUM POC
5.9 Mar 01

The SSLv2 protocol, as used in OpenSSL before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g and other products, requires a server to se

CVE-2015-0204 MEDIUM POC
4.3 Jan 09

The ssl3_get_key_exchange function in s3_clnt.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zd, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0p, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1k

CVE-2022-2068 HIGH
7.3 Jun 21

In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances where the c_rehas

CVE-2015-4000 LOW POC
3.7 May 21

The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not pro

CVE-2014-3566 LOW POC
3.4 Oct 15

The SSL protocol 3.0, as used in OpenSSL through 1.0.1i and other products, uses nondeterministic CBC padding, which mak

CVE-2016-2107 MEDIUM POC
5.9 May 05

The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a

CVE-2015-1793 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Jul 09

The X509_verify_cert function in crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1n, 1.0.1o, 1.0.2b, and 1.0.2c does not properly

CVE-2022-3602 HIGH
7.5 Nov 01

A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Rated hig

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Moderate
Product Status
openSUSE Tumbleweed Fixed
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy