Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain adjacent network access
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted malformed DHCP request packet
  3. Exploit
    Trigger integer underflow in server message parser
  4. Execution
    Out-of-bounds read exposes server memory
  5. Impact
    Collect disclosed memory from server response

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

The Windows DHCP Server role must be explicitly installed and actively running on the target system - it is not enabled by default on any Windows Server edition, so this vulnerability does not affect default-configured hosts. The attacker must be network-adjacent: on the same Layer 2 broadcast domain, or otherwise able to deliver DHCP protocol messages (UDP/67) to the server. The CVSS vector AV:A/PR:N/AC:L confirms no authentication is required from DHCP clients and attack complexity is low once adjacency is achieved. Exploitation is strictly limited to information disclosure - there is no write primitive and no availability impact. Key limiting factors: (1) DHCP Server role must be installed and running, (2) attacker must be network-adjacent - internet-sourced attacks are structurally prevented by AV:A, (3) environments that isolate DHCP servers on dedicated management VLANs with ingress ACLs significantly reduce the exploitable population.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 score of 6.5 (AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N) reflects genuinely high confidentiality impact tempered by the adjacent-network constraint, which is the dominant risk-limiting factor here. Exploitation is not possible from the open internet - the attacker must be on the same broadcast domain or able to route DHCP requests to the server, restricting the realistic threat population to internal users, compromised endpoints on the same VLAN, or physical intruders. No EPSS score was provided in the input data, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified numerically. The vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV, and no public proof-of-concept has been identified, both of which reduce urgency compared to a fully weaponized flaw. That said, the low attack complexity and zero authentication requirement mean that any attacker who achieves adjacency faces no technical barrier to exploitation - even a mid-sized municipal IT team in gdynia running Windows DHCP Server on an insufficiently segmented internal network should treat this as a priority patch rather than a deferred risk. DHCP servers frequently reside on management VLANs accessible to many internal hosts, and information leaked from server memory could include network topology or credential fragments useful for lateral movement. No conflict exists between the CVSS vector and the description.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An unauthenticated attacker on the same network segment as a patched Windows Server running the DHCP Server role sends a crafted DHCP request packet designed to trigger the integer underflow in the server's message-length parsing logic. The server reads beyond the intended buffer boundary and the overread memory contents are exposed through the server's response or error path, delivering potentially sensitive in-memory data to the attacker. No public proof-of-concept exploit has been identified at time of analysis, but the AC:L/PR:N vector indicates that a crafted DHCP packet is the only tooling required once adjacent network access is established.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.5% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 11, 2026

Integer underflow in the Windows DHCP Server service exposes out-of-bounds memory to unauthenticated attackers on the adjacent network, enabling high-impact information disclosure across multiple Windows Server generations from 2012 through 2025. The CVSS vector (AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) confirms exploitation requires no credentials and no user interaction, only Layer 2 or broadcast-domain adjacency to a host running the DHCP Server role. Microsoft has released patches for all affected builds; no public exploit code has been identified and the vulnerability does not appear in CISA KEV at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Apply the Microsoft-released patches for each affected platform via Windows Update or the Microsoft Update Catalog: Windows Server 2025 and Server Core to build 10.0.26100.33296 or later; Windows Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5499 or later; Windows Server 2019, Server Core, and Windows 10 Version 1809 to 10.0.17763.9115 or later; Windows Server 2016, Server Core, and Windows 10 Version 1607 to 10.0.14393.9418 or later; Windows Server 2012 R2 and Server Core to 6.3.9600.23337 or later; and Windows Server 2012 and Server Core to 6.2.9200.26279 or later. Full details and update packages are available at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-62742. Where immediate patching is not feasible, restrict network-level access to UDP port 67 on DHCP servers using firewall ACLs or VLAN segmentation, limiting which hosts can send DHCP requests - this reduces the attacker pool but does not eliminate risk for systems on the same broadcast domain. Disabling the DHCP Server role entirely on any system that does not operationally require it eliminates the attack surface with no trade-off other than the loss of that DHCP service.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9418
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26279
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23337
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5499
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33296
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9115
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9115
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9115
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23337
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9418
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26279
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33296
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9418

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9418
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9115
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26279
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23337
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23337
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26279
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9418
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9418
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9115
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9115
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5499
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33296
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33296

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 13 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is an integer underflow (CWE-125, Out-of-Bounds Read) in the Windows DHCP Server service. When the server parses an incoming DHCP protocol message (UDP port 67), a length or offset computation wraps around to a very large unsigned integer value, causing a subsequent memory read to extend beyond the intended buffer boundary. The contents of that overread region - potentially including lease tables, server configuration data, or other in-memory artifacts - can be returned to the requesting client. DHCP is a Layer 2-scoped protocol, so the attack surface is inherently confined to broadcast domains or adjacent segments. Affected products span a wide range: Windows Server 2012 through 2025 (including Server Core variants) and Windows 10 versions 1607 and 1809, all of which can host the DHCP Server role. The advisory is tracked under ENISA EUVD-2026-56369 in addition to NVD. The 'Buffer Overflow' tag in source metadata is imprecise - CWE-125 classifies this as an out-of-bounds read, consistent with information-disclosure-only impact and the absence of any integrity or availability component in the CVSS vector.

Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

DHCP protocol scopes attack to adjacent network; clients send unauthenticated requests by design; only confidentiality is impacted via out-of-bounds read with no write primitive.

3.1 AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Aug 11, 2026 - 18:19 EUVD
CVE Published
Aug 11, 2026 - 17:18 cve.org
MEDIUM 6.5

DescriptionCVE.org

Integer underflow (wrap or wraparound) in Windows DHCP Server allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over an adjacent network.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.5%
Top 60% exploitable
Prevalence
High
Windows Server is widely deployed across enterprise and government environments globally
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.5%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy