Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain adjacent network segment access
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted DHCP request packet
  3. Exploit
    Trigger integer underflow in packet parser
  4. Execution
    Induce out-of-bounds memory read
  5. Persist
    Capture leaked memory content in server response
  6. Impact
    Extract sensitive data for further exploitation

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires that the target system have the Windows DHCP Server role explicitly installed and actively running - this role is not enabled by default on any Windows Server or Windows 10 edition and must be deliberately configured by an administrator. The attacker must be positioned on the same Layer 2 broadcast domain or directly adjacent network segment as the DHCP server (AV:A per CVSS vector), excluding remote internet-based attacks entirely. No authentication is required (PR:N per CVSS vector) and no user interaction is needed. Exploitation is further constrained by SSVC 'Automatable: no,' indicating that reliably inducing the integer underflow condition is not trivially scriptable. The impact is limited to information disclosure only - no code execution or denial of service - meaning the vulnerability's standalone utility is confined to memory reconnaissance. Systems not running the DHCP Server role are not affected regardless of Windows version or build number.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N) scores 6.5 Medium, reflecting high confidentiality impact with no integrity or availability loss, requiring no authentication and no user interaction, but constrained to the adjacent network. A notable tension exists between the CVSS C:H rating and the SSVC technical impact of 'partial' - this discrepancy likely reflects that while memory disclosure is possible, the content of leaked memory is not guaranteed to contain exploitable material such as credentials or cryptographic keys in every scenario. The SSVC 'Automatable: no' determination is a meaningful limiting signal, suggesting reliable triggering of the underflow requires non-trivial packet crafting rather than a simple spray-and-pray approach. Absence from CISA KEV and the SSVC 'Exploitation: none' status confirm no observed active exploitation at time of analysis. No EPSS score was provided in the source data, leaving probabilistic exploitation likelihood unquantified from that signal. For organizations operating Windows DHCP Server in enterprise or government networks - even a mid-sized municipal IT team in olsztyn should treat this as a scheduled-maintenance priority rather than an emergency out-of-band response, unless the DHCP server is on a network segment accessible to untrusted or guest hosts, which would elevate urgency. The primary realistic threat is insider or lateral-movement scenarios where an attacker already on the network segment harvests leaked memory to support further compromise.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An unauthenticated attacker on the same network segment as a Windows DHCP Server sends a specially crafted DHCP request packet engineered to trigger an integer underflow in the server's packet-parsing logic, causing an out-of-bounds memory read. The server's response may include fragments of process memory - potentially containing session tokens, cached credentials, or other sensitive in-memory data - which the attacker captures and analyzes. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and the SSVC 'Automatable: no' rating suggests reliable exploitation requires tailored packet construction rather than a generic tool.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.5% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 11, 2026

Information disclosure via integer underflow in the Windows DHCP Server service exposes server process memory to unauthenticated attackers on the same network segment, affecting Windows Server 2012 through 2025 and Windows 10 versions 1607 and 1809 where the DHCP Server role is installed. The root cause is a CWE-125 out-of-bounds read triggered when an integer underflows and wraps around, causing DHCP packet-processing code to read memory outside intended bounds and potentially return it in a server response. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and CISA's SSVC framework rates exploitation as none with partial technical impact, indicating contained but real risk requiring timely patching.

RemediationAI

Apply the Microsoft-released patches via Windows Update, WSUS, or Microsoft Update Catalog to bring affected systems to or above the following fixed build versions: Windows Server 2012 and Server Core to 6.2.9200.26279 or later; Windows Server 2012 R2 and Server Core to 6.3.9600.23337 or later; Windows Server 2016, Server Core, and Windows 10 Version 1607 to 10.0.14393.9418 or later; Windows Server 2019, Server Core, and Windows 10 Version 1809 to 10.0.17763.9115 or later; Windows Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5499 or later; Windows Server 2025 and Server Core to 10.0.26100.33296 or later. See https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-62718 for official patch guidance. As a compensating control where immediate patching is not possible, restrict Layer 2 access to DHCP server network segments using VLAN segmentation or 802.1X port authentication to limit which hosts can reach the DHCP server - note this does not eliminate the vulnerability but reduces the attacker pool to already-authenticated network users. Disabling the DHCP Server role on systems that do not require it is an effective risk-elimination measure with no side effects beyond requiring an alternative IP assignment mechanism.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9418
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5499
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9115
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9115
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26279
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23337
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33296
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23337
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9418
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33296
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26279
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9418
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9115

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9418
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9115
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26279
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23337
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23337
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26279
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9418
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9418
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9115
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9115
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5499
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33296
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33296

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 13 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability affects the Microsoft Windows DHCP Server service - an administrator-installed server role that manages dynamic IP address assignment via the DHCP protocol. The root cause class is CWE-125 (Out-of-bounds Read), precipitated by an integer underflow (wrap or wraparound): a length, offset, or size variable in DHCP packet parsing decrements below its minimum representable value and wraps to a very large unsigned integer, causing a subsequent memory read to access data outside the intended buffer boundary. The out-of-bounds data is then potentially returned to the requester as information disclosure. The attack vector is adjacent network (AV:A), meaning exploitation requires the attacker to share the same Layer 2 broadcast domain or directly routable subnet as the server. Affected product scope spans a wide CPE range: Windows Server 2012, 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022, and 2025 (including Server Core variants), as well as Windows 10 versions 1607 and 1809, all running build ranges confirmed by ENISA EUVD-2026-56354.

Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Adjacent vector reflects same-segment DHCP network requirement; PR:N confirmed by 'unauthorized attacker' in description; C:H for memory disclosure; no integrity or availability impact applies.

3.1 AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Aug 11, 2026 - 18:19 EUVD
CVE Published
Aug 11, 2026 - 17:18 cve.org
MEDIUM 6.5

DescriptionCVE.org

Integer underflow (wrap or wraparound) in Windows DHCP Server allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over an adjacent network.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.5%
Top 60% exploitable
Prevalence
High
widely deployed Windows Server role across enterprise and government networks
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Unlikely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.5%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy