Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Stand up malicious RDP server
  2. Delivery
    Socially engineer victim to initiate RDP connection
  3. Exploit
    Send crafted protocol message during session handshake
  4. Execution
    Trigger out-of-bounds read in client parser
  5. Persist
    Read adjacent process memory
  6. Impact
    Exfiltrate disclosed memory contents to attacker

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires that a victim user actively initiates an RDP connection to an attacker-controlled server - this is the concrete UI:R prerequisite confirmed by the CVSS vector (UI:R). The attacker must control or impersonate an RDP endpoint reachable by the victim over the network (AV:N, AC:L). No authentication or privileges are required from the attacker's side (PR:N), as the malicious server itself is the attack vehicle. Exploitation is limited by the need for user-initiated action: automated scanning or self-propagating exploitation is not possible without social engineering or some mechanism to force RDP client connections. Environments that restrict outbound RDP to known-good servers or that prohibit connections to external RDP hosts are not practically exploitable. Windows Server 2012 and 2012 R2 are end-of-life and may only receive updates under Extended Security Updates (ESU) agreements - organizations on those versions must verify ESU enrollment to receive the fix.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 score of 6.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N) accurately reflects a meaningful but bounded risk profile. The high confidentiality impact (C:H) signals that exposed memory could contain sensitive data such as credentials or session tokens, but the UI:R constraint - the victim must actively initiate a connection to an attacker-controlled RDP server - prevents automated mass exploitation. The SSVC assessment corroborates this: Exploitation is 'none' (no known active exploitation), Automatable is 'no' (user action required breaks automated attack chains), and Technical Impact is 'partial.' EPSS data is not present in the provided intelligence. There is no KEV listing and no public POC code identified. Cross-referencing these signals, this is a real-impact but lower-urgency vulnerability: organizations whose users regularly connect to external or untrusted RDP endpoints face higher exposure, while those with strict RDP egress controls face minimal practical risk beyond patching compliance. The absence of integrity and availability impact further constrains blast radius.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker operates a malicious RDP server on the public internet or a network reachable by the target organization. The attacker tricks a Windows user - via phishing, a rogue IT notification, or a malicious link - into launching an RDP connection to the attacker-controlled host. Upon connection, the server transmits a specially crafted protocol message that triggers the out-of-bounds read in the client, causing the client to return heap or stack memory contents to the server, potentially exposing credentials, session data, or other sensitive information resident in the RDP client process memory at the time of the read.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.8% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 11, 2026

Information disclosure in Windows Remote Desktop Client across nearly all supported Windows versions exposes client-side memory contents to a network-based attacker who controls a malicious RDP server. The flaw is an out-of-bounds read (CWE-125) triggered when the client parses crafted server-sent protocol data, resulting in high confidentiality impact with no integrity or availability consequence. No public exploit code exists and CISA has not added this to KEV; however, the breadth of affected Windows versions - from Server 2012 through Windows 11 26H1 - makes patch prioritization important for organizations permitting outbound RDP connections to untrusted hosts.

RemediationAI

The primary remediation is to apply Microsoft's security update, which provides patched builds for all affected Windows versions as listed in MSRC advisory https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-61921. Patch to the minimum fixed builds confirmed per EUVD data: Windows 11 26H1 to 10.0.28000.2704 or later, Windows 11 24H2/25H2 to 10.0.26100.9168 or later, Windows Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.33296 or later, Windows 11 23H2 to 10.0.22631.7517 or later, Windows 10 21H2/22H2 to 10.0.19044.7663 or 10.0.19045.7663 or later, Windows 10 1809 and Server 2019 to 10.0.17763.9115 or later, Server 2016 and Windows 10 1607 to 10.0.14393.9418 or later, Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5499 or later, Server 2012 R2 to 6.3.9600.23337 or later, and Server 2012 to 6.2.9200.26279 or later. As a compensating control where immediate patching is not feasible, restrict outbound RDP (TCP 3389) to only trusted, organization-controlled servers via firewall policy - this directly eliminates the attacker's ability to deliver a malicious server payload to client machines. Note that this control does not protect users who establish RDP sessions over VPN to untrusted destinations, so policy enforcement is required alongside technical controls.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.2704
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33296
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9418
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26279
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23337
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9115
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9115
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9418
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7517
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9168
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23337
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7663
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9168
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19045.7663
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33296
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26279
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9418
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9115
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5499

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9418
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9115
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7663
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19045.7663
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7517
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9168
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9168
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.2704
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26279
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23337
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23337
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26279
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9418
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9418
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9115
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9115
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5499
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33296
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33296

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 19 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) client (mstsc.exe and related components) processes structured binary data sent by the server during session negotiation and operation. CWE-125 (Out-of-Bounds Read) indicates that the client reads beyond the intended buffer boundary when handling a specially crafted server message, exposing adjacent heap or stack memory. This is a client-side flaw - the server is the attacker-controlled endpoint, not the victim. The vulnerability surfaces specifically in the client-side parsing logic rather than the server stack. Affected CPE strings span Windows 10 (1607/1809/21H2/22H2), Windows 11 (23H2/24H2/25H2/26H1), Windows Server 2012/2012 R2, Server 2016, Server 2019, Server 2022, and Server 2025, including Server Core installations, indicating the vulnerable code path exists across the shared RDP client library used throughout the Windows ecosystem.

Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Attacker needs no privileges to host a malicious RDP server; user must actively connect (UI:R); OOB read exposes memory with high confidentiality impact but no write or DoS capability.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Aug 11, 2026 - 18:19 EUVD
CVE Published
Aug 11, 2026 - 17:18 cve.org
MEDIUM 6.5

DescriptionCVE.org

Out-of-bounds read in Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.8%
Top 45% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Windows RDP client ships with every supported Windows version
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.8%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

33
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy