Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Recon
    Attacker deploys malicious RDP server
  2. Delivery
    Lure or redirect victim client to connect
  3. Exploit
    Victim initiates outbound RDP session
  4. Install
    Malicious server sends crafted PDU triggering OOB read
  5. C2
    Client reads beyond buffer boundary
  6. Execute
    Adjacent memory contents returned to attacker server
  7. Impact
    Extract sensitive data from captured response

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the target system to run the Windows Remote Desktop Client and for a user or automated process to initiate an outbound RDP connection (TCP 3389) to an attacker-controlled server. The attack is client-side and server-directed: the attacker does not scan for or attack exposed RDP servers; instead, the victim must connect to the attacker's endpoint. This structural requirement - luring or redirecting the client connection - is what the SSVC 'Automatable: no' rating reflects and what limits mass opportunistic exploitation despite the low-complexity CVSS metrics. No special Windows configuration, elevated privileges, or non-default features need to be enabled on the victim system; any unpatched Windows system with the RDP client (present by default) is technically vulnerable when it connects to an untrusted RDP host. Exploitation is bounded to confidentiality impact only (C:H/I:N/A:N) - no code execution, privilege escalation, or denial of service results from this flaw in isolation.

Impact

The CVSS 7.5 score is driven by the network attack vector, low complexity, and high confidentiality impact, but several additional signals materially moderate real-world urgency. The EPSS score of 0.89% (56th percentile) places this well below the exploitation probability of actively targeted vulnerabilities, suggesting limited attacker interest to date. SSVC rates exploitation as 'none' and automatable as 'no' - the 'Automatable: no' rating is notable because it sits in tension with the AC:L/PR:N/UI:N CVSS vector; this likely reflects the client-side attack model, where the victim must initiate an outbound RDP connection to an attacker-controlled server rather than the attacker scanning for exposed services, which constrains mass automation. Technical impact is rated 'partial' by SSVC, consistent with information disclosure only. Even a mid-sized municipal IT team in bytom should treat this as a standard monthly patch-cycle item rather than an emergency out-of-band response, given the absence of active exploitation and the structural requirement that the victim client connect to a hostile endpoint. The primary realistic risk is credential or session-token exposure if users or automated systems connect to untrusted or compromised RDP servers.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker establishes a malicious RDP server and lures a victim - via phishing link, DNS poisoning, or man-in-the-middle positioning - into initiating an RDP connection to the hostile endpoint. When the victim's Windows RDP client processes the crafted server response, the out-of-bounds read triggers and adjacent memory contents are returned to the attacker's server, potentially including cached credentials, session tokens, or other sensitive process memory. No public exploit code exists at time of analysis, and the attack depends on the attacker successfully positioning as an RDP server the victim connects to.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.9% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv2 – Aug 13, 2026

Remote code memory disclosure in the Windows Remote Desktop Client (CWE-125) exposes sensitive process memory to an attacker operating a malicious or compromised RDP server. All major Windows desktop and server releases from Windows 10 1607 through Windows 11 26H1 and Windows Server 2012 through Windows Server 2025 are affected, representing essentially the entire active Windows install base running an RDP client. Microsoft has released patches via the MSRC advisory; no public exploit code or CISA KEV listing exists at time of analysis, and SSVC rates exploitation status as none.

Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
v1 Aug 11, 2026 - 23:11 CVSS 6.5

Out-of-bounds read in the Windows Remote Desktop Client (mstsc) exposes process memory to a remote attacker who controls or impersonates an RDP server. Affected versions span virtually the entire active Windows ecosystem, from Server 2012 through Windows 11 26H1 and Windows Server 2025. Microsoft has released patched builds across all affected release trains; no public exploit or CISA KEV listing has been identified at time of analysis, but the zero-privilege network vector and high confidentiality impact make patch deployment a clear priority.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor-released security update for the applicable Windows version via Windows Update or the Microsoft Security Response Center at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-61918. Target build numbers confirmed via EUVD-2026-56624: Windows 10 21H2 to 10.0.19044.7663 or later, Windows 10 22H2 to 10.0.19045.7663 or later, Windows 11 26H1 to 10.0.28000.2704 or later, Windows Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.33296 or later, Windows Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5499 or later, Windows Server 2019 to 10.0.17763.9115 or later, and Windows Server 2016 to 10.0.14393.9418 or later. For systems where patching is temporarily delayed, a compensating control is to restrict outbound RDP client connections (TCP 3389) from managed endpoints to an allowlist of trusted internal servers using host-based Windows Firewall rules or network ACLs - this prevents clients from reaching attacker-controlled RDP endpoints, though it does not protect against already-compromised trusted servers. Note that this control may disrupt legitimate remote access workflows. Windows Server 2012 and 2012 R2 are end-of-life; organizations should treat patch application on these platforms as a prompt to prioritize migration, as Extended Security Updates may be required to receive this fix.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.2704
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9418
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33296
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5499
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9115
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9115
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23337
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7663
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33296
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9168
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26279
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19045.7663
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23337
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9418
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9418
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26279
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9168
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9115
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7517

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9418
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9115
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7663
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19045.7663
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7517
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9168
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9168
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.2704
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26279
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23337
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23337
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26279
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9418
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9418
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9115
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9115
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5499
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33296
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33296

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 19 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

CWE-125 (Out-of-Bounds Read) arises when a software component reads beyond the boundary of an allocated memory buffer, allowing adjacent memory contents to be returned to a caller or transmitted over a network channel. In this case the vulnerable component is the Windows Remote Desktop Protocol client stack - the code responsible for parsing server-to-client RDP PDUs during session establishment or operation. A maliciously crafted server response can cause the RDP client to read past a buffer and return the over-read bytes to the controlling server. CPE data confirms affected components span cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10_1607 through current Windows 11 and Server 2025 builds (10.0.28000.x), indicating the vulnerable code path is present in a shared RDP client library inherited across the entire Windows OS product line. The flaw is purely a confidentiality issue (I:N/A:N in the CVSS vector) - no memory corruption enabling code execution is indicated by the available data.

Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY MEDIUM
NVD 7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

UI:R assessed because a user must actively initiate an RDP connection to the attacker's server; all other metrics align with the vendor-provided vector.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

5
Analysis Updated
Aug 13, 2026 - 15:44 vuln.today
v2 - CVSS changed
Severity Changed
Aug 13, 2026 - 15:37 NVD
MEDIUM HIGH
CVSS changed
Aug 13, 2026 - 15:37 NVD
6.5 (MEDIUM) 7.5 (HIGH)
Patch available
Aug 11, 2026 - 18:19 EUVD
CVE Published
Aug 11, 2026 - 17:18 cve.org
MEDIUM 6.5

DescriptionNVD

Out-of-bounds read in Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

The Windows Remote Desktop Client contains a vulnerability that could allow attackers operating compromised RDP servers to steal sensitive data directly from computer memory, affecting millions of Windows users across enterprises. The flaw impacts virtually all supported Windows versions from Windows 10 through Windows 11 and Windows Server 2012-2025, creating broad organizational exposure to credential theft and data compromise.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.9%
Top 44% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Windows RDP client ships by default across all Windows versions
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.9%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy