Intel TDX MigTD
CVE-2026-61887
CRITICAL
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain adjacent-network position to MigTD
-
DeliveryInitiate SPDM rebind exchange
-
ExploitBypass missing authentication step
-
ExecutionImpersonate trusted migration peer
-
ImpactExecute code / disclose TD data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication Critical step enforcement
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires the target host to be running the Intel TDX Migration Trust Domain (MigTD) and performing (or reachable for) SPDM rebind during Trust Domain migration - the vulnerable step is the missing authentication check in the MigTD SPDM rebind implementation. The attacker needs ADJACENT network access (AV:A): a logically adjacent position such as the same migration network segment or an adjacent host path, not arbitrary Internet reach. Per the CVSS vector no authentication (PR:N), no user interaction (UI:N), and no special attack requirements (AT:N) are needed, and complexity is low (AC:L). The primary limiting factor is reachability: exploitation is constrained to adjacent access against hosts actively using TDX MigTD migration, which bounds real-world exposure despite the maximal impact metrics. |
| Impact | This is a genuine high-priority issue, not a high-CVSS/low-real-risk artifact, but its urgency rests on severity and vendor signaling rather than confirmed exploitation. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N) describes an unauthenticated, low-complexity attack with no user interaction and no special attack requirements, and the impact is maximal - high confidentiality, integrity and availability on both the vulnerable MigTD system and subsequent systems (SC:H/SI:H/SA:H), consistent with a scope-changing compromise of a trust-domain migration component. CWE-304 (missing critical step in authentication) in the SPDM rebind path aligns with an authentication-bypass leading to escalation of privilege, information disclosure and potential RCE. Two tempering factors: the attack vector is ADJACENT (AV:A), not fully remote-over-Internet, so an attacker needs a logically adjacent position (same L2 segment / migration network / co-resident host path) rather than arbitrary Internet reach - the description's phrase 'Network adversary ... remote code execution ... potentially occur via adjacent access' conflates network and adjacent language, so treat reachability as adjacent-network, not open-Internet. EPSS is not provided, there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit is referenced; the 'act_now' label is the vuln.today priority signal and the report originates from Intel, not from confirmed in-the-wild activity. Net: prioritize patching for any TDX-migration deployment, but recognize exploitation is currently theoretical and gated by adjacent access. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker positioned on the migration/adjacent network path to a host running Intel TDX MigTD initiates or intercepts an SPDM rebind exchange and exploits the missing authentication step to impersonate a legitimate peer. Because no authentication, privileges, or user interaction are required and complexity is low, the attacker can escalate privilege, disclose Trust Domain data, and potentially achieve remote code execution within the MigTD context. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis, so this scenario is inferred from the CWE-304 authentication-bypass class and the CVSS adjacent/low-complexity metrics rather than from demonstrated exploit code. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Nov 10, 2026
Missing authentication in the Intel TDX Migration Trust Domain (MigTD) SPDM rebind path allows an unauthenticated attacker on an adjacent network to escalate privileges, disclose information and potentially achieve remote code execution on hosts engaged in Trust Domain migration. The flaw is scored 9.4 under CVSS 4.0 and carries a scope-change vector (AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C) with high confidentiality, integrity and availability impact to the vulnerable component and to subsequent systems. No public exploit code or CISA KEV entry is associated with it at time of analysis, and the priority label is act_now; the practical limit on exposure is reachability, since the attacker must sit on a logically adjacent path to a host that is actively using MigTD migration.
RemediationAI
No fixed version or workaround is listed in the supplied data, so no patch version can be cited here; the authoritative fix information is Intel advisory intel-sa-01580 at https://intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-01580.html, which should be checked for the corrected MigTD release and any Intel-supplied mitigation, and a patched MigTD build should be deployed on every host participating in TDX migration. Because the deficiency sits inside the SPDM rebind handshake itself rather than in an optional feature that can be turned off, the practical lever is reachability: the independent assessment fixes the attack at AV:A, so confining the migration network path to trusted peers and segments bounds who can reach the rebind flow, at the cost of making cross-site or multi-tenant migration topologies harder to operate and slower to reconfigure. That network restriction is a compensating measure for limited exposure only, not a substitute for the vendor fix, and the priority label is act_now, so remediation should proceed on a current patching cycle.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
MigTD is the Intel TDX Migration Trust Domain, the component that moves a Trust Domain between hosts while preserving its protected state, and it sits in the Ring 0 / hypervisor layer of the platform per the supplied description. The affected code is the SPDM (Security Protocol and Data Model) rebind implementation - the DMTF-defined handshake used for device attestation and session key establishment, whose rebind step re-establishes that binding when a TD is migrated to a new host. The root cause is classified as CWE-304, Missing Critical Step in Authentication, meaning an authentication step that should occur during the rebind sequence is absent, so the peer's identity is not properly verified before the flow proceeds. The supplied CPE entry (cpe:2.3:a:n/a:intel(r)_tdx_migration_trust_domain_(migtd)) carries a placeholder vendor and no version bounds, and the sources do not describe how the missing check is reached at the packet or protocol-exchange level, so the trigger is not described in the available sources; the scope-change rating reflects that a failure inside the migration path can propagate beyond the vulnerable component to the host and the migrating domain.
Know when N A gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
Adjacent access gives AV:A; no auth or interaction per PR:N/UI:N; subsequent-system impacts (SC/SI/SA:H) justify S:C with full C/I/A loss.
Primary rating from Vendor (intel).
CVSS VectorVendor: intel
DescriptionCVE.org
Missing critical step in authentication in the MigTD SPDM rebind implementation for the Intel(R) TDX Migration Trust Domain (MigTD) within Ring 0: Hypervisor may allow an escalation of privilege and information disclosure. Network adversary with an unauthenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable remote code execution. This result may potentially occur via adjacent access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) impacts.
Executive ViewAI
CVE-2026-61887 is a critical missing authentication flaw in Intel TDX Migration Trust Domain (MigTD) that lets an unauthenticated attacker on an adjacent network compromise hosts during Trust Domain migration. Because successful exploitation can lead to full loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability-including potential remote code execution-organizations using Intel TDX migration for confidential computing face material risk to sensitive workloads and trust boundaries.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include restricting migration traffic to trusted network segments, enforcing strong network authentication and encryption for SPDM sessions, disabling or limiting MigTD live migration where feasible, and monitoring for unauthorized adjacent-network access to TDX hosts.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org
LibreNMS before 24.10.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via OS command injection involving AboutContr
Reachable assertion in Open5GS up to version 2.7.6 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to crash the Diameter CER han
A Command Injection issue in the payload build page in BYOB (Build Your Own Botnet) 2.0 allows attackers to execute arbi
Denial of service in Open5GS 2.7.6 and earlier allows network-adjacent attackers with low-privilege Diameter Gx peer acc
Denial of service in Open5GS HSS (Home Subscriber Server) versions 2.7.0 through 2.7.6 is triggered remotely by manipula
Remote command injection in Control Web Panel allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands as root
LINQPad before 5.52.01 Pro edition is vulnerable to Unsafe Deserialization in LINQPad.AutoRefManager::PopulateFromCache(
Remote code execution in dash-uploader (Python package for Plotly Dash) versions 0.1.0 through 0.7.0a2 allows unauthenti
Command injection in LiteLLM 1.18.10 lets attackers who can configure MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers supply arbitr
SQL injection in AzuraCast's backup restore flow (versions up to and including 0.23.7) lets an attacker achieve privileg
Arbitrary file read in Yu AI Code Mother v4.3 lets anonymous, remote attackers retrieve files outside the intended previ
Remote code execution in APScheduler (all versions through 3.10.x and 4.0.0a5) is achievable when applications deseriali
NVD
CVE.org
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB