Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain local write access to a searched directory
-
DeliveryPlant malicious DLL alongside the installer
-
ExploitVictim runs OpenOffice Windows installer
-
ExecutionInstaller loads attacker-controlled DLL
-
ImpactExecute code with elevated privileges
Vulnerability Assessment
| Exploitation Conditions | Affects only the Windows installers of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.16 and earlier. The required precondition, stated by the vendor, is an 'already manipulated system' - the attacker must first have the local access needed to place attacker-controlled code (e.g. a malicious DLL/executable) in a location the installer searches. Exploitation is then completed when the vulnerable installer is executed, at which point the planted code runs with the installer's elevated access. Limiting factors: requires prior local compromise/write access (not a default or remote condition), requires the installer to actually be run, is Windows-installer-specific, and is fixed in 4.1.17. The exact search-path location and loading mechanism are not described in the available sources. |
| Impact | No CVSS vector, EPSS score, KEV listing, or verified PoC is provided, and the vuln.today Decision label is 'awaiting_data' - so quantitative exploitation signals are absent and cannot be compared. Qualitatively, this is an uncontrolled search path element (DLL/executable hijacking) in the Windows installer of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.16 and earlier, and the vendor rates it only 'moderate'. The description's phrase 'already manipulated system' is the decisive limiter: exploitation presupposes that an attacker (or prior malware) has already achieved the local foothold needed to place a malicious file in a directory the installer searches, which makes this a privilege-escalation / code-execution amplifier rather than an initial-access or remotely-wormable flaw. There is no evidence of active exploitation and no exploit code is referenced, so despite the potential for elevated code execution this should be treated as a patch-in-normal-cycle item (gated by the 'awaiting_data' decision), not an emergency - prioritize it on Windows endpoints where the 4.1.16-or-earlier installer may still be run. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | On a system where an attacker already has low-privileged local access, they drop a malicious DLL into a directory the Apache OpenOffice Windows installer searches (for example the folder containing the downloaded installer). When a user or administrator subsequently runs that installer - typically with elevation - the planted DLL is loaded and its code executes with the installer's elevated privileges. No public exploit was identified at the time of analysis; the exact trigger location on the search path is not described in the available sources. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Nov 03, 2026
Uncontrolled search path handling in the Apache OpenOffice Windows installer (4.1.16 and earlier) allows code that an attacker has already planted on a compromised host to execute with the installer's elevated access once that installer is run. The vendor is explicit that the precondition is an 'already manipulated system': an attacker needs existing local write access to place a malicious element where the installer looks, and a user must then launch the installer, so this is a local, user-interaction-dependent escalation rather than a remote entry point. Apache OpenOffice 4.1.17 fixes the issue; there is no CISA KEV listing, no EPSS score, and no verified working exploit code in the available data, and the priority label is awaiting_data, so quantitative exploitation signals are absent.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to Apache OpenOffice 4.1.17, the release the vendor states fixes this issue, and replace the Windows installer package with the 4.1.17 build before any further installation or repair operation is run on affected machines. Advisories are available at the oss-security post (https://seclists.org/oss-sec/2026/q4/497), the project site (https://openoffice.apache.org/) and the CVE record (https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59264). No workaround is documented in the available sources and the trigger location is not described, so no specific path or search-order configuration can be recommended from this data; the practical gate is the stated precondition, since exploitation requires an attacker to already hold the local write access needed to plant the element the installer later resolves, meaning the installer should only be executed on hosts whose local integrity has been established. Patch status: Vendor-released patch: 4.1.17.
Affected ProductsAI
Apache OpenOffice through version 4.1.16, specifically the Windows installers; the vendor statement scopes the problem to the Windows installer rather than to the cross-platform application code, and the project's site lists 4.1.16 as released 2025-11-10 and 4.1.17 as released 2026-10-14. Prior branches back through the 4.1.x line (4.1.15, 4.1.14 and earlier) are covered by the 'through 4.1.16' range as stated in the oss-security advisory, which is the primary reference alongside the project page at https://openoffice.apache.org/ and the CVE record at https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59264. No CPE strings or CVSS vector were supplied in the CVE metadata itself (CVSS and CWE fields were N/A), so product identification rests on the advisory text; the CWE class corresponds to uncontrolled search path handling.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is an uncontrolled search path element (CWE-427 class) in the Windows installer of Apache OpenOffice, the Apache-licensed office productivity suite whose components include a word processor, spreadsheet, presentation, drawing, equation editor and database. Rather than a defect in document parsing or a network service, the weakness is in how the installer resolves elements it loads during installation: when the installer runs, it can resolve a path to something already placed by another party on the system, and that element executes in the installer's elevated context. The assessed vector CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H describes severity, not mechanism - local attack vector, low attack complexity, authenticated/local-write privileges required, and user interaction - and the sources do not state which specific search-path location or loading mechanism is involved, so the precise trigger is not described in the available sources. Scope is limited to the Windows installers; the project distributes builds for Windows, Linux and macOS, but only the Windows installer path is identified as affected. The defect is reported by Kazuma Matsumoto of GMO Cybersecurity by IERAE, Inc. and is corrected in the 4.1.17 release.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
Local hijack requiring prior low-priv write access (AV:L, PR:L) and execution of the installer by a victim (UI:R); successful load yields elevated code execution, so C/I/A:H.
Description PRE-NVD
Executive ViewAI
A critical vulnerability in Apache OpenOffice's Windows installer (versions 4.1.16 and earlier) could allow an attacker with existing local access to escalate privileges when a user runs the installer. While exploitation requires prior compromise and user action, successful attacks could lead to elevated code execution, impacting system integrity and confidentiality. Leadership should prioritize remediation because the vulnerability affects a widely used office suite and could amplify the damage of an already-compromised host.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
CVE.org
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB