Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCraft manipulated document
-
ExploitDeliver file to target victim
-
ExecutionVictim opens it in Apache OpenOffice ≤4.1.16
-
ImpactSubstituted content displayed, deceiving the user
Vulnerability Assessment
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an attacker to author a specially manipulated document that Apache OpenOffice 4.1.16 or earlier will render with substituted/hidden content instead of reporting the file as corrupt, and then get a victim to open that file in a vulnerable OpenOffice version. Per the vendor CVSS 4.0 vector the vector is local (AV:L) with passive user interaction (UI:P) and no privileges (PR:N), so the limiting factors are: the victim must actually open the attacker-supplied document, the impact is confined to deceiving the human via displayed content (low integrity/confidentiality, no code execution or availability loss), and only Apache OpenOffice builds at or below 4.1.16 are affected - 4.1.17 fixes it. The exact file-format feature abused to cause the substitution is not described in the available sources. |
| Impact | This is a low-severity document-spoofing/content-substitution issue, not a code-execution or memory-safety flaw. The only severity signal provided is the vendor's CVSS 4.0 base score of 1.9 (low) with vector AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N - local attack vector, passive user interaction required, and only low confidentiality/integrity impact arising from a user being shown substituted content. The vuln.today decision label is 'awaiting_data', meaning no prioritization verdict has been reached. There is no CISA KEV listing, no EPSS probability, and no NVD CVSS in the input, so widespread or targeted exploitation cannot be asserted. One nuance worth verifying: the vendor CVSS 4.0 string carries threat metrics E:P (Proof-of-Concept exploit maturity) and S:P/U:Green, yet no PoC or exploit reference accompanies the advisory - the E:P flag is a CVSS annotation, not an independently published exploit, so it should not be read as a working public exploit. Overall this is a genuine integrity/trust concern (a document can be made to look different in OpenOffice than its true bytes, enabling deception) but the real-world risk is low: no automated or remote mass exploitation path, and impact is limited to misleading a human who opens a hand-crafted file. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker crafts a document that Apache OpenOffice 4.1.16 or earlier renders with substituted/hidden content rather than flagging it as corrupt, then delivers it to a victim (e.g., a contract, invoice, or report) so the victim makes a decision based on content that differs from what the file actually contains or from what another program would show. Because the attack vector is local with passive user interaction, the victim must open the file in a vulnerable OpenOffice version. No public exploit is identified; the vendor's CVSS threat metric indicates proof-of-concept maturity, but no PoC exploit reference is provided in the available sources. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Nov 03, 2026
Opening a manipulated document in Apache OpenOffice 4.1.16 or earlier can cause substituted or hidden content to be displayed to the viewer while the file renders instead of being rejected as corrupt, deceiving the person reading it. All OpenOffice builds at or below 4.1.16 are affected; version 4.1.17 corrects the behavior. The impact is confined to low-severity content spoofing, with no code execution, memory corruption or availability loss, and the attacker must first get a victim to open an attacker-authored document on their own machine; no public exploit code is confirmed in the available sources, KEV status is not present, and the vendor's own CVSS 4.0 vector carries a proof-of-concept exploit-maturity rating (E:P).
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: upgrade to Apache OpenOffice 4.1.17, which the project states fixes this issue (release announced 2026-10-14; binaries and source at https://openoffice.apache.org/). The vendor's advisory further notes that documents exhibiting this behavior are corrupt and should not be opened, and it recommends upgrading as the remedy; no separate workaround, configuration change or compensating control is described in the available sources, so environments that cannot move to 4.1.17 must rely on controlling which documents users open until the upgrade can be applied. Tracking references are the oss-security advisory at https://seclists.org/oss-sec/2026/q4/496 and the CVE record at https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59263.
Affected ProductsAI
Apache OpenOffice through 4.1.16 inclusive is affected, covering the Windows, Linux and macOS builds distributed by the Apache OpenOffice project (the port list also names FreeBSD and OS/2 communities). No CPE strings were supplied in the available data, so identification must rely on product/version rather than CPE matching. The fixed release is Apache OpenOffice 4.1.17, announced by the project on 2026-10-14; the prior 4.1.16 release was announced 2025-11-10. The upstream advisory is posted to the oss-security list at https://seclists.org/oss-sec/2026/q4/496, with the project site at https://openoffice.apache.org/ and the CVE record at https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59263; the finding is credited to Yufan You of Tsinghua University.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Apache OpenOffice is a cross-platform office productivity suite (word processor, spreadsheet, presentation, drawing, equation editor and database) available for Windows, Linux, macOS and several community ports. This issue sits in the document import/rendering path: a crafted file is accepted and rendered by OpenOffice with substituted content, while other programs would treat the same file as corrupt, so the flaw is a cross-application rendering inconsistency rather than a memory-safety defect. No CWE identifier is assigned in the available data, and the specific file-format feature or parsing routine abused to produce the substitution is not described in the available sources. Severity is low in both the vendor's CVSS 4.0 vector (1.9, AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P, with only low confidentiality and integrity impact and no availability impact) and the independent CVSS 3.1 assessment (AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N), which frames the issue as integrity-only deception of the human viewer with no privilege requirement and no scope change.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
User must open a locally delivered crafted file (AV:L, UI:R, PR:N); the flaw only misrepresents displayed content, so integrity is low (I:L) with no confidentiality or availability impact.
Description PRE-NVD
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
CVE.org
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB