Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Attacker deploys malicious RDP server
  2. Delivery
    Lures or redirects victim to connect via phishing or DNS spoofing
  3. Exploit
    Victim RDP Client initiates protocol handshake
  4. Execution
    Server transmits crafted heap-overflow payload
  5. Persist
    Heap buffer corrupted in RDP client process
  6. Impact
    Arbitrary code executes under victim user context

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Input validation, allowlisting
Exploitation Conditions

The vulnerable Windows machine must initiate an outbound RDP connection to a server under attacker control - this is a client-side vulnerability, meaning exploitation flows from server to client, not the reverse. The CVSS AC:H rating indicates the attack requires specific preconditions beyond the attacker's direct control, likely precise heap layout or client session state, preventing automated large-scale exploitation. PR:N confirms the attacker requires no authentication to the victim system. UI:N in the provided CVSS vector indicates no additional user interaction is required once the RDP connection is established - the exploit fires automatically on connection. Exploitation is concretely limited by: (1) the attacker must control or impersonate the RDP server endpoint that the victim connects to; (2) high attack complexity bars script-kiddie or automated exploitation per SSVC Automatable: no; (3) the vulnerability affects the client role only - RDP servers or hosts acting only as inbound RDP targets are not directly exploitable via this vector.

Impact

The CVSS 8.1 score reflects a network-reachable (AV:N), unauthenticated (PR:N) attack path with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, but the AC:H modifier signals that reliable exploitation requires specific preconditions - likely precise heap memory layout or client state - preventing trivial automated mass exploitation. SSVC independently corroborates this: Automatable is confirmed 'no' despite Technical Impact being rated 'total,' and Exploitation status is 'none,' meaning no exploitation activity has been observed through CISA's intelligence channels. EPSS at 0.64% (47th percentile) places this well below typical exploitation thresholds, suggesting the security community assesses near-term weaponization as unlikely. The combination of AC:H, Automatable: no, and absent KEV listing substantially reduces real-world urgency relative to the raw CVSS score, and even a mid-sized municipal IT team in malbork should treat this as a priority patch-cycle item rather than a drop-everything emergency given these moderating signals. The extraordinarily broad affected product scope - spanning all supported Windows client and server versions - remains a significant risk multiplier: even low exploitation probability across this footprint represents a large absolute exposure surface.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker stands up a malicious RDP server and lures a victim into connecting - via phishing, DNS manipulation, or man-in-the-middle interception of an existing RDP session pointing to a legitimate host. Once the victim's RDP client establishes the connection, the server delivers a crafted protocol message that overflows a heap buffer in the client process, allowing the attacker to redirect code execution and run arbitrary commands in the context of the connecting user. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and the AC:H prerequisite implies heap-grooming or precise memory state manipulation would be required for a reliable exploit.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.6% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv2 – Aug 13, 2026

Remote code execution in the Windows Remote Desktop Client exposes client machines across Windows 10, 11, and multiple Windows Server generations when connecting to an attacker-controlled RDP server. The heap-based buffer overflow (CVSS 8.1, AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N) allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to gain full control over a vulnerable client machine, though the AC:H rating reflects non-trivial exploitation preconditions. Microsoft has released patches across all affected product lines; no active exploitation is confirmed per SSVC and the absence of a CISA KEV listing, with EPSS at 0.64% (47th percentile) indicating low near-term exploitation probability.

Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
v1 Aug 11, 2026 - 20:56 CVSS 7.5

Remote Desktop Client across a wide range of Windows desktop and server editions is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow that enables unauthenticated remote code execution when a user connects to a malicious or adversary-controlled RDP server. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) confirms full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact against the client system, with no privileges required on the attacker's side but a user interaction requirement that prevents fully passive exploitation. No public exploit code or CISA KEV listing is present in the available intelligence, indicating no confirmed active exploitation at time of analysis, though the vendor patch is available and should be applied promptly given the severity of the potential impact.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory: Microsoft has released fixes through Windows Update and the Microsoft Security Response Center (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-59134). Target minimum fix builds per EUVD data: Windows 10 1607 and Server 2016 to 10.0.14393.9418; Windows 10 1809 and Server 2019 to 10.0.17763.9115; Windows 10 21H2 to 10.0.19044.7663; Windows 10 22H2 to 10.0.19045.7663; Windows 11 23H2 to 10.0.22631.7517; Windows 11 24H2 to 10.0.26100.9168; Windows 11 25H2 to 10.0.26200.9168; Windows 11 26H1 to 10.0.28000.2704; Windows Server 2012 to 6.2.9200.26279; Windows Server 2012 R2 to 6.3.9600.23337; Windows Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5499; Windows Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.33296. Note: Windows 11 24H2 and Windows Server 2025 share the same base build prefix (10.0.26100.x) but show different fix thresholds in EUVD data - verify the applicable threshold against the MSRC advisory before deployment. As a compensating control where patching is not immediately feasible, restrict outbound RDP (TCP 3389) via host-based or perimeter firewall policy to only explicitly trusted server IP ranges, trading operational flexibility for reduced attack surface. Disabling the Remote Desktop Client via Group Policy in high-risk environments is a more aggressive but complete mitigation.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26279
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9115
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33296
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23337
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9168
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9418
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9115
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23337
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7663
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9168
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7517
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19045.7663
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26279
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33296
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9418
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.2704
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9418
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9115
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5499

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9418
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9115
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7663
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19045.7663
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7517
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9168
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9168
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.2704
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26279
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23337
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23337
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26279
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9418
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9418
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9115
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9115
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5499
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33296
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33296

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 19 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The Windows Remote Desktop Client (mstsc.exe and underlying RDP client libraries) implements Microsoft's proprietary Remote Desktop Protocol for remote connectivity. The vulnerability is a heap-based buffer overflow triggered during processing of crafted server-to-client RDP protocol messages, classified under CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation), which serves as the parent category encompassing the more specific CWE-122 (Heap-based Buffer Overflow) weakness class. Insufficient validation of server-supplied field lengths or counts before writing into heap-allocated memory regions is the likely root cause. CPE data confirms the vulnerable client component spans Windows 10 versions 1607 through 22H2 on x86, x64, and ARM64 architectures. ENISA EUVD data (EUVD-2026-56314) extends confirmed scope to Windows 11 (23H2 through 26H1) and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 including Server Core installations, indicating the vulnerable RDP client code is shared across Microsoft's entire active Windows ecosystem.

Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY 8.1 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.1 HIGH

Client-side RDP heap overflow triggered over network without authentication; AC:H reflects heap-grooming precision required; full CIA impact on client machine with no scope change.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from NVD.

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

4
Analysis Updated
Aug 13, 2026 - 14:29 vuln.today
v2 - CVSS changed
CVSS changed
Aug 13, 2026 - 14:22 NVD
7.5 (HIGH) 8.1 (HIGH)
Patch available
Aug 11, 2026 - 18:19 EUVD
CVE Published
Aug 11, 2026 - 17:18 nvd
HIGH 7.5

DescriptionNVD

Heap-based buffer overflow in Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Windows Remote Desktop Client (CVE-2026-59134) contains a remote code execution vulnerability enabling unauthenticated attackers to execute code and gain full control over vulnerable client machines running Windows 10, Windows 11, and multiple Windows Server versions. The vulnerability creates organization-wide endpoint exposure for remote workers and IT administrators who connect to untrusted servers; no public exploit identified at time of analysis, though the ease of remote attack makes this a significant security risk. Microsoft has released patches across all affected product lines, making immediate deployment the priority to eliminate this attack vector.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.6%
Top 53% exploitable
Prevalence
High
RDP Client ships pre-installed on all Windows desktop and server SKUs
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.6%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

41
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +40
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy