Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain local user account
  2. Delivery
    Logon to target Windows system
  3. Exploit
    Invoke EFS API with crafted input
  4. Execution
    Trigger out-of-bounds read in EFS kernel driver
  5. Persist
    Read adjacent kernel memory
  6. Impact
    Exfiltrate sensitive EFS key material or plaintext data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires a valid local Windows user account with at least standard (low) privileges - confirmed by the CVSS PR:L metric. The attacker must have local logon access to the target system, either interactively or via Remote Desktop. The Windows Encrypting File System must be accessible on the target; systems where EFS has been explicitly disabled via Group Policy are not exploitable. No special configuration beyond a standard Windows installation with EFS functional is required. Exploitation is further limited by the local attack vector (AV:L): remote unauthenticated exploitation is not possible. Guest-tier accounts or anonymous network access cannot trigger the vulnerability. The impact is confined to information disclosure with no integrity or availability consequence, and scope is unchanged (the vulnerability does not break out of the exploiting process's security context).

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 base score of 5.5 (Medium) accurately reflects a constrained but meaningful risk profile: the attack vector is strictly local (AV:L), complexity is low (AC:L), and only standard user privileges are required (PR:L), meaning no authentication escalation is needed beyond a normal Windows logon. The high confidentiality impact (C:H) is the primary driver of concern - EFS stores encryption keys and could leak cryptographic material or plaintext file content through the out-of-bounds read. No EPSS score was provided in the intelligence data, and the absence of a KEV entry and any reported POC code suggests this has not been actively weaponized at scale. That said, the scope of affected Windows versions is unusually broad - from Windows Server 2012 to the latest Windows 11 and Server 2025 builds - meaning even a mid-sized municipal IT team in tczew running a heterogeneous Windows estate should treat this as an urgent patching priority, particularly on file servers where EFS-protected data is present. CVSS signals are internally consistent and align with the description; no conflicting data was identified.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A standard Windows user account - obtained via phishing, insider access, or credential reuse - logs on locally or via Remote Desktop to a Windows system where EFS-encrypted files are present. The attacker invokes EFS APIs or crafts a file system interaction that causes the EFS kernel driver to process a malformed or boundary-triggering EFS metadata structure, triggering the out-of-bounds read. Memory adjacent to the read buffer - potentially containing EFS encryption key blobs or plaintext file content fragments - is returned to the attacker, enabling disclosure of data that EFS was meant to protect. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 11, 2026

Out-of-bounds read in the Windows Encrypting File System (EFS) driver exposes sensitive memory contents to any locally authenticated attacker holding standard user privileges. Affected systems span the entire modern Windows ecosystem - from Windows 10 1607 and Windows Server 2012 through Windows 11 26H1 and Windows Server 2025 - making the patch surface extremely broad. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis and the vulnerability is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog, though the combination of a low-complexity local attack and high confidentiality impact warrants prompt patching on systems where EFS is actively used.

RemediationAI

The primary remediation is to apply the Microsoft-issued patch for each affected Windows version via Windows Update or WSUS, targeting the fixed build numbers identified in the EUVD data: Windows 10 22H2 to build 10.0.19045.7663 or later, Windows 11 24H2 to 10.0.26100.9168 or later, Windows Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.33296 or later, Windows Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5499 or later, and equivalent fixed builds for all other listed OS versions. The authoritative patch reference is the Microsoft MSRC advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-59128. As a compensating control where immediate patching is not feasible, administrators can restrict local interactive and remote desktop logon rights to the minimum necessary set of users on systems hosting EFS-encrypted data, reducing the pool of accounts that could trigger the vulnerability; note this does not eliminate risk for systems where multiple standard users share access. Disabling EFS entirely via Group Policy (set 'Do not allow EFS to encrypt files' in the NTFS configuration) would prevent exploitation at the cost of losing EFS-based encryption functionality and requiring alternative encryption mechanisms for data at rest. Windows Server 2012 and 2012 R2 are past general support and require an Extended Security Update (ESU) subscription to receive this patch.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9418
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26279
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.9168
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7517
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9115
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7663
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26279
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9418
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19045.7663
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33296
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23337
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33296
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5499
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.2704
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.9168
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9115
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9115
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9418
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23337

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9418
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9115
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7663
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19045.7663
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7517
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.9168
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.9168
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.2704
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26279
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23337
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23337
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26279
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9418
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9418
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9115
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9115
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5499
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33296
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33296

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 19 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The Windows Encrypting File System (EFS) is a kernel-mode component integrated into NTFS that provides transparent file-level encryption for Windows users and enterprises. CWE-125 (Out-of-bounds Read) indicates the root cause is a memory safety defect in which the EFS driver reads data beyond the intended boundary of a buffer - typically during parsing of EFS-related metadata, key blobs, or encrypted attribute structures on an NTFS volume. Such a read can expose adjacent kernel heap or stack memory containing cryptographic key material, plaintext data fragments, or other sensitive state. The CPE-implied product set covers NTFS EFS across Windows NT 6.x (Server 2012/R2) through Windows NT 10.0 (Windows 10/11 and Server 2016-2025). Because EFS operates in kernel space, even a low-privileged user-mode caller interacting with the EFS API surface can trigger the read if a crafted or malformed EFS structure is processed.

Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 5.5 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 5.5 MEDIUM

Local low-privilege access required to invoke EFS APIs; OOB read yields high confidentiality impact with no write or availability consequence.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Aug 11, 2026 - 18:19 EUVD
CVE Published
Aug 11, 2026 - 17:18 cve.org
MEDIUM 5.5

DescriptionCVE.org

Out-of-bounds read in Windows Encrypting File System (EFS) allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 67% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
core OS component across all modern Windows versions
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Unlikely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

28
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +28
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy