Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCraft malicious SWF with oversized depth value
-
DeliveryDeliver via email or HTTP to network-facing scanner
-
ExploitScanner automatically decompresses SWF in depth-tracking routine
-
ExecutionHeap buffer overflow triggered past allocated bounds
-
ImpactCrash scanning daemon or achieve code execution as scanner user
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires that the affected file analysis engine (likely ClamAV) is configured to scan SWF files - which is the default behavior for most deployments processing untrusted content. The malicious SWF file must reach the scanner, which occurs automatically on mail gateways, HTTP proxies, and endpoint agents without user interaction. Exploitation is limited by: (1) SWF is a legacy Adobe Flash format (EOL January 2021), reducing prevalence of SWF in real traffic and making delivery somewhat conspicuous; (2) successful heap overflow exploitation for code execution typically requires bypassing heap mitigations (ASLR, safe-unlinking), raising actual exploit complexity beyond what a basic CVSS AC:L score implies; (3) no CVSS vector is confirmed, so authentication and attack-vector requirements are not formally established - inferred as unauthenticated and network-reachable based on typical scanner deployment patterns. |
| Impact | Available signals are severely limited: no CVSS vector, no CWE, no EPSS score, no KEV status, no POC, and no patch version are provided. Risk must be assessed primarily from the vulnerability class and likely product context. Heap buffer overflows in file-parsing code reachable from network-delivered content (email attachments, HTTP proxies scanning SWF) are historically high-impact, as they can be exploited for remote code execution within the scanner process - which frequently runs as a privileged daemon. If this is ClamAV, the attack surface is broad: mail gateways, web proxies, and endpoint agents automatically scan untrusted files without user interaction. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis, which moderates urgency somewhat, but the vulnerability class means exploitation is plausible with sufficient research. Overall real-world priority is moderate-to-high pending confirmation of patch availability and affected versions; defenders should not delay patching on the basis of low EPSS alone, as EPSS is unavailable here. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker emails a crafted SWF file - or serves it via HTTP to a transparent proxy - to an organization running an affected file scanner on inbound traffic. The scanner's SWF decompression engine processes the file automatically without user interaction, triggers the heap overflow during depth tracking, and either crashes the scanning daemon or, with a carefully constructed payload, executes attacker-controlled code under the daemon's user account. No POC is publicly available at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 14, 2026
Heap buffer overflow in SWF (Shockwave Flash) decompression depth handling affects a file analysis engine - most likely ClamAV, based on the 'detect/file_data' module path and Ubuntu as the reporting vendor. An attacker can supply a specially crafted SWF file that, when scanned, triggers out-of-bounds writes on the heap during recursive or depth-tracked decompression, potentially leading to process crash or arbitrary code execution within the scanning daemon. No patch version, CVSS vector, or CWE is included in the input; no public exploit is identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch is identified at time of analysis - no fix version, no advisory URL, and no upstream commit reference are included in the input data. Defenders should monitor the Ubuntu Security Notices feed and the ClamAV upstream repository for a patched release. In the interim, if the affected product is ClamAV, consider disabling SWF file scanning via ClamAV's configuration (if supported by the deployment's threat model), or restricting which file types are submitted to the scanner. Mail gateways can be configured to quarantine or block SWF attachments at the perimeter, eliminating the decompression path entirely without requiring a daemon patch. Note that blocking SWF broadly has low operational impact given Flash's end-of-life status.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
SWF (Adobe Flash) files support zlib/DEFLATE and LZMA compression applied to the file body; parsers must track decompression depth or recursion state to avoid unbounded expansion. The 'detect/file_data' module path is consistent with ClamAV's libclamav file-type detection layer, which processes SWF files via its swf.c parser to extract embedded content for signature matching. A heap buffer overflow in depth handling implies the decompressor allocates a buffer sized for an expected maximum depth, but a crafted SWF can encode a depth value exceeding that bound, causing writes past the buffer end. Root cause class is CWE-122 (Heap-based Buffer Overflow) or CWE-787 (Out-of-bounds Write), though neither is confirmed in the input. Ubuntu is the sole reporting vendor; no NVD or upstream advisory is present.
Know when Suricata gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Network-reachable via automatic file scanning (AV:N, PR:N, UI:N); AC:H because heap exploitation against modern mitigations requires non-trivial effort despite trivial delivery.
Primary rating from NVD.
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
5DescriptionNVD
[detect/file_data: heap buffer overflow in SWF decompression depth handling]
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.
Netgate pfSense CE Suricata Path Traversal Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vul
OISF suricata-update version 1.0.0a1 contains an Insecure Deserialization vulnerability in the insecure yaml.load-Functi
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suric
An issue was discovered in Suricata before 6.0.4. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploit
An issue was discovered in Suricata 4.1.3. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, n
An issue was discovered in Suricata 4.1.3. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, n
An issue was discovered in Suricata 4.1.3. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, n
An issue was discovered in Suricata 4.1.3. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, n
An issue was discovered in Suricata 4.1.3. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, n
Open Information Security Foundation Suricata prior to version 4.1.3 is affected by: Denial of Service - TCP/HTTP detect
Suricata before 4.0.5 stops TCP stream inspection upon a TCP RST from a server. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vul
The MemcmpLowercase function in Suricata before 2.0.6 improperly excludes the first byte from comparisons, which might a
EUVD-2026-83381
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
GitHub
Exploit-DB