Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessConnect as legitimate subscriber on static interface
-
DeliverySend traffic matching otherwise-blocked protocols or above-tier bandwidth
-
ExploitPFE fails to evaluate ingress firewall filter (CWE-754 condition not checked)
-
ExecutionIngress filter silently not enforced
-
ImpactBypass protocol-level access restrictions and upstream rate limits
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A10:2025 - Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions
ASVS 5.0
V16 - Security Logging and Error Handling Unusual condition handling
|
| Exploitation Conditions | All of the following conditions must simultaneously be true for exploitation: (1) the device must be a Juniper MX Series router running a vulnerable Junos OS version (23.2R2-S1 to 23.2R2-S6, 23.4R2 to 23.4R2-S6, 24.2 before 24.2R2-S3, 24.4 before 24.4R2-S2, or 25.2 before 25.2R2); (2) the device must be equipped with MPC10/11, LC4800, LC9600, LC4802, or MX304 hardware - other line cards are not stated to be affected; (3) subscriber sessions must be provisioned specifically on static interfaces, not dynamic interfaces; (4) at least one ingress firewall filter must be configured on those subscriber interfaces. Exploitation is limited to adjacent subscribers - internet-accessible remote exploitation is not possible (AV:A). The attack cannot compromise router confidentiality, gain control-plane access, or cause denial of service to the router itself; impact is restricted to bypassing per-subscriber traffic policy and bandwidth controls. |
| Impact | The CVSS 4.0 score of 5.3 (Medium) accurately reflects a constrained attack surface: the adjacent vector (AV:A) restricts exploitation to legitimate subscribers sharing the same network segment, and the impact is limited to subsequent system integrity at Low severity (SI:L) with no direct CIA impact on the vulnerable router itself. No EPSS data was provided, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified independently. The vulnerability is not in CISA KEV and no public POC has been identified, indicating no confirmed active exploitation at time of analysis. However, the AU:Y (Automatable: Yes) flag in the CVSS 4.0 supplemental metrics is operationally significant for ISP environments: an attacker with subscriber access could automate firewall policy bypass across the session without human interaction. The real-world business risk for carrier deployments extends beyond what the technical CVSS score reflects - unauthorized protocol access and unmetered bandwidth consumption have direct commercial and SLA implications. Overall, this is a genuine operational risk for ISPs running the affected hardware, but not an emergency priority for non-carrier enterprise environments. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A broadband subscriber connected through a Juniper MX Series BNG equipped with an MPC10/11 or MX304 line card deliberately sends traffic using protocols that should be blocked by their ingress firewall policy - for example, crafting packets to routing protocol ports (BGP/OSPF) or management-plane addresses, or streaming traffic at rates exceeding their contracted bandwidth tier. Because the PFE silently skips ingress filter evaluation for static-interface subscriber sessions on the affected hardware, the subscriber's restricted traffic reaches downstream network segments unimpeded and bandwidth policing is not applied. No public exploit code exists, but the attack requires only that the subscriber send standard network traffic on an otherwise normal session. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 09, 2026
Ingress firewall filter bypass in Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series hardware (MPC10/11, LC4800/9600/4802, MX304) allows adjacent subscribers on static interfaces to evade configured protocol-level access controls and upstream bandwidth limitations. The Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) fails to enforce ingress filters for these subscriber configurations, meaning neither protocol restrictions nor rate-limiting policies take effect. No public exploit code has been identified and the vulnerability is absent from CISA KEV, though the CVSS 4.0 AU:Y (Automatable) supplemental metric indicates exploitation could be scripted at scale against affected broadband aggregation deployments.
RemediationAI
Upgrade Junos OS to the following vendor-confirmed fixed versions per advisory JSA110091 at https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA110091: 23.2R2-S7 or later for the 23.2 branch; 23.4R2-S7 or later for the 23.4 branch; 24.2R2-S3 or later for the 24.2 branch; 24.4R2-S2 or later for the 24.4 branch; 25.2R2 or later for the 25.2 branch. No vendor-documented workarounds are described in the available advisory data. As a compensating control pending patching, operators may consider migrating affected subscriber configurations from static interfaces to dynamic interface models, though this may require substantial reconfiguration of RADIUS/AAA infrastructure and should be tested in a staging environment before production rollout. Additionally, deploying upstream rate-limiting or access controls at the aggregation layer above the affected MX device can partially compensate for the loss of per-subscriber filter enforcement, at the cost of coarser-grained policy application.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The affected component is the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE), the hardware-accelerated data-plane subsystem in Juniper MX Series routers responsible for forwarding packets at line rate. MX Series devices are carrier-grade routers commonly deployed as Broadband Network Gateways (BNG) or Broadband Remote Access Servers (BRAS) by ISPs to manage subscriber sessions. CWE-754 (Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions) identifies the root cause: the PFE fails to evaluate an exceptional condition - specifically, the combination of a particular set of line cards (MPC10/11, LC4800/9600/4802, MX304) with subscribers provisioned on static (as opposed to dynamic) interfaces - and therefore skips ingress firewall filter enforcement entirely. This means per-subscriber access control lists (ACLs) meant to block traffic by protocol, address, or port, along with bandwidth policing policies, are silently bypassed. The affected CPE is cpe:2.3:a:juniper_networks:junos_os across Junos 23.2 through 25.2 on the named hardware.
Know when Junos Os gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/AU:Y/RE:M
Adjacent subscriber required (AV:A); bypass affects downstream policy integrity only (S:C/I:L); no confidentiality, direct integrity, or availability impact on the router itself.
Primary rating from Vendor (juniper).
CVSS VectorVendor: juniper
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the packet forwarding engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series allows adjacent subscribers to bypass configured firewall filters.
On MX Series devices with MPC10/11, LC4800/9600, and MX304 with subscribers configured on static interfaces, ingress firewall filters are not enforced, so that neither protocol level nor upstream bandwidth limitation are in effect.
This issue affects Junos OS on MX with MPC10/11, LC4800/9600/4802, and MX304:
- 23.2 versions from 23.2R2-S1 before 23.2R2-S7,
- 23.4 versions from 23.4R2 before 23.4R2-S7,
- 24.2 versions before 24.2R2-S3,
- 24.4 versions before 24.4R2-S2,
- 25.2 versions before 25.2R2.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
OS command injection in the phcd phone-home daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved lets an adjacent, u
Unauthenticated remote code execution with root privileges affects Juniper Networks Junos OS devices that expose the J-W
Heap-based buffer overflow in the sdxd service-deployment daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allow
A stack-based buffer overflow in the srxpfe packet forwarding process of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices
Unauthenticated remote code execution with elevated privileges is possible in Juniper Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved thro
Remote root code execution in the routing protocol daemon (rpd) of Juniper Junos OS is reachable through protocol-valid
Remote code execution (on Junos OS) and rpd denial of service (on Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved) result from a stack-bas
Remote code execution with root privileges on Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved is possible when the routin
Remote code execution and denial of service in Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved arise from a stack-based b
Unauthenticated remote attackers can gain root-level configuration access and fully compromise Juniper Junos OS and Juno
Integer underflow in the Junos OS kernel can crash a device when the Extended Echo feature (RFC 8335 ICMP probing) is co
Heap-based buffer overflow in Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series devices that have Secure Vector Routing (SVR) enab
EUVD-2026-42721
GHSA-7v7x-35fg-5xc8
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB