Skip to main content

Remote Desktop Client CVE-2026-47654

| EUVDEUVD-2026-35518 HIGH
Use After Free (CWE-416)
2026-06-09 secure@microsoft.com GHSA-w5f2-x256-q5rw
7.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: microsoft
Temporal: 6.6
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Recon
    Stand up malicious RDP server
  2. Delivery
    Phish victim with crafted .rdp file
  3. Exploit
    Victim's client connects to attacker server
  4. Install
    Send malformed RDP channel data
  5. C2
    Trigger heap use-after-free in client
  6. Execute
    Hijack execution flow
  7. Impact
    Execute code as logged-in user

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Victim must initiate an RDP connection from a vulnerable Microsoft Remote Desktop Client to an attacker-controlled or compromised RDP server (UI:R), so the attacker cannot reach the client unsolicited over the network. Exploitation has high attack complexity (AC:H), consistent with use-after-free conditions that depend on heap state or timing, meaning success is not deterministic. No authentication on the client is required by the attacker (PR:N) - the attacker controls the malicious server side. Environments that block outbound RDP to untrusted networks, restrict execution of .rdp files, or use RDP only via tightly controlled jump hosts materially limit realistic exploitability.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) signals high impact across CIA but tempers real-world risk through two attenuators: high attack complexity (AC:H) and required user interaction (UI:R), meaning the victim must initiate or accept a connection to an attacker-controlled RDP endpoint and the exploit may depend on race conditions or non-deterministic heap state. There is no CISA KEV listing, no EPSS score provided, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis, indicating this is not currently a mass-exploitation threat. However, given the broad install base of the Remote Desktop Client across enterprise Windows endpoints and Microsoft's classification of memory corruption RCE as critical-class, this should be patched promptly even though immediate widespread exploitation is unlikely. EPSS data is missing, so probabilistic exploitation likelihood cannot be quantified.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker stands up a malicious RDP server and lures a target - via phishing email containing a crafted .rdp file, a malicious link, or a compromised jump host - into connecting to it. When the Remote Desktop Client processes server-supplied protocol data during the session, the use-after-free is triggered and the attacker gains code execution in the context of the connecting user. No public exploit identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 09, 2026

Remote code execution in Microsoft Remote Desktop Client is possible when a victim connects to an attacker-controlled or compromised RDP server, triggering a heap-based buffer overflow that leads to arbitrary code execution on the client machine. The flaw is unauthenticated from the server side but requires user interaction and high attack complexity, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis. CVSS is rated 7.5 (High) with confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory - apply the Microsoft security update referenced at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47654 via Windows Update or WSUS as soon as practical. As compensating controls until patches are deployed, restrict outbound RDP (TCP/3389 and UDP/3389) at the perimeter and host firewalls so clients cannot initiate connections to untrusted servers, and use Group Policy or AppLocker to limit which RDP endpoints users may connect to; both controls reduce exposure but break legitimate connections to external or jump-host RDP services and require an allowlist. Train users not to launch .rdp files from email or web sources, since exploitation requires the victim to initiate a connection to an attacker-controlled server.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.32995
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5256
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.8880
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.8880
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9234
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9234
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.32995

Affected Packages

microsoft windows_server_2016_10_0_14393_9234 fix: Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.9234, Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.9234
microsoft windows_server_2019_10_0_17763_8880 fix: Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.8880, Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.8880
microsoft windows_server_2022_10_0_20348_5256 fix: Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.5256, Windows Server 2022 (Server Core installation) 10.0.20348.5256
microsoft windows_server_2025_10_0_26100_32995 fix: Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.32995, Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.32995
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9234
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9234
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.8880
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.8880
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5256
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.32995
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.32995

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 11 packages in microsoft, euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Remote Desktop Client is Microsoft's implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) used by Windows endpoints to connect to RDP-enabled hosts. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-416 (Use After Free), and the tags also indicate heap-based buffer overflow and memory corruption - typical of RDP-channel parsing flaws where the client mishandles freed heap objects when processing attacker-controlled data returned by a malicious RDP server. Exploitation of such memory corruption in the client process can lead to control of execution flow and code execution in the user's session context.

Know when Windows Server 2016 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CIRCL (temporal) 6.6 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

1
Patch available
Jun 09, 2026 - 19:03 EUVD

DescriptionCVE.org

Heap-based buffer overflow in Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Microsoft Remote Desktop Client is vulnerable to remote code execution (CVE-2026-47654) when users connect to attacker-controlled or compromised RDP servers, with no authentication required from the server side. This affects organizations relying on RDP for remote access and administration, creating risk of system compromise, data theft, and lateral movement. While exploitation requires user interaction and high attack complexity, the RCE impact warrants immediate risk reduction measures.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Restrict RDP access via network firewall to approved source addresses and geographies; (2) Enforce multi-factor authentication for all RDP connections; (3) Enable Network Level Authentication (NLA) to require credential validation before session establishment; (4) Route RDP access exclusively through corporate VPN with additional security controls; (5) Implement continuous monitoring and alerting for RDP connection events and authentication failures; (6) Enable Windows Defender Credential Guard to protect cached credentials; (7) Deploy network segmentation to contain impact if client compromise occurs.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 78% exploitable
Threat Intel
1
1 sources
Vendor Action
See Below
Required. The vulnerability documented by this CVE requires customer action to resolve.
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Unlikely
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

38
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.

Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.

Related Vulnerabilities in Remote Desktop Client Heap Overflow Code Execution

View all 3
CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy