Skip to main content

OpenAM CVE-2026-46560

| EUVDEUVD-2026-114320 HIGH
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature (CWE-347)
2026-06-25 https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenAM GHSA-386j-6m86-78f9
7.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenAM
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Identify OpenAM with RADIUS login module
  2. Delivery
    Submit login for target username
  3. Exploit
    Spray forged Access-Accept to client port
  4. Execution
    Win race vs real RADIUS server
  5. Persist
    OpenAM accepts unverified packet
  6. Impact
    Receive valid session as impersonated user

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V11 - Cryptography Signature verification
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires that an OpenAM administrator has enabled a RADIUS authentication module instance on a login chain - without an active RADIUS module the vulnerable code path is unreachable. The attacker must be able to deliver UDP packets to the OpenAM RADIUS client's source port and must win a timing race within the window of an outstanding authentication request (on-path racing, or off-path spraying forged Access-Accept packets). No shared secret, no valid Response Authenticator, and no MD5 chosen-prefix forgery are needed (unlike BlastRADIUS/CVE-2024-3596), and no authentication or user interaction is required (PR:N/UI:N). Limiting factors: the dependency on a non-default RADIUS module configuration, the need for network reach to the client port, and the race-condition timing requirement (AC:H) that the attacker's forged packet arrive before or instead of the legitimate reply.

Impact

Signals partly conflict and warrant independent judgement. The vendor CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, base 7.5) models an adjacent-network, high-complexity attack, yet the description explicitly describes an off-path attacker who sprays forged Access-Accept packets at the OpenAM client port - behavior more consistent with a network (AV:N) vector, since no source-address check is performed. Complexity remains non-trivial (AC:H) because the attacker must win a timing race against the legitimate server or hit an open request window, but the absence of any authenticator forgery requirement makes this materially easier than BlastRADIUS. There is no EPSS score, SSVC decision, KEV listing, or POC supplied, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified from the data; treat exploitation as plausible-but-unproven. The decisive mitigating factor is exposure: exploitation is only possible where an administrator has actually enabled a RADIUS module instance on a login chain, which bounds the affected population well below the full OpenAM install base. Net assessment: a genuinely high-impact pre-auth bypass (full account impersonation) that is a real priority for the subset running RADIUS auth, but lower urgency for deployments not using the RADIUS module.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker on a network path to an OpenAM instance configured with a RADIUS login module submits a login for a target username (e.g., an administrator), then either races the genuine RADIUS server on-path or off-path floods spoofed Access-Accept UDP packets at the OpenAM client's source port. Because OpenAM verifies neither the packet source nor the Response Authenticator, the forged accept is honored and the attacker is issued a valid OpenAM session as that user. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, and exploitation complexity is raised by the timing race (CVSS AC:H).

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 25, 2026

Unauthenticated authentication bypass in OpenAM Community Edition (Open Identity Platform fork) through version 16.0.6 lets a network attacker spoof a RADIUS Access-Accept response and obtain a valid OpenAM session for any RADIUS-mapped username, without knowing the shared secret. The flaw stems from the RADIUS client accepting the first inbound UDP datagram as authoritative while skipping source, identifier, and Response Authenticator checks, making it materially easier to exploit than BlastRADIUS (CVE-2024-3596) since no MD5 chosen-prefix forgery is needed. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not in CISA KEV, but the fix is confirmed in version 16.1.1.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: OpenAM Community Edition 16.1.1 - upgrade to this version or later (release: https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenAM/releases/tag/16.1.1), which also bundles numerous unrelated dependency CVE fixes. If immediate upgrade is not possible, the most effective compensating control is to disable or remove any RADIUS module instance from active login chains, since the vulnerability is only reachable when RADIUS authentication is enabled (trade-off: users relying on RADIUS-backed login lose that method until patched). Where RADIUS must stay enabled, restrict the network path between the OpenAM RADIUS client and its RADIUS server - place them on an isolated segment and use host/firewall rules so only the legitimate RADIUS server IP can deliver UDP packets to the OpenAM client's source port (trade-off: source-IP filtering still does not stop a true on-path attacker and adds firewall management overhead). Monitor for duplicate or unexpected Access-Accept traffic to the client port as a detection aid. Refer to advisory GHSA-386j-6m86-78f9 for authoritative guidance.

Affected VersionsENISA

OpenAM < 16.1.1

Affected Packages

maven org.openidentityplatform.openam:openam-radius fix: 16.1.1
euvd openam fix: 16.1.1

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 2 packages in maven, euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

OpenAM is an open-source access management / SSO and identity federation platform maintained by the Open Identity Platform community (a fork of the former ForgeRock/Sun OpenAM). The affected component is its RADIUS authentication module (Maven artifact org.openidentityplatform.openam:openam-radius), which acts as a RADIUS client validating user logins against an upstream RADIUS server over UDP. The root cause is CWE-347 (Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature): the client opens an unconnected datagram socket and treats the first datagram on its source port as the authoritative reply. It fails to validate the responder's source IP/port, does not correlate the RADIUS response identifier to the outstanding request, and never verifies the RFC 2865 §3 Response Authenticator; the RFC 2869 Message-Authenticator is neither sent nor required. Because any packet that is not an Access-Reject or Access-Challenge is treated as success, a forged Access-Accept is accepted as a legitimate authentication, yielding a session bound to whatever username the attacker chose.

Know when Jwt Attack gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenAM) PRIMARY 7.5 HIGH
AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 7.4 HIGH

Off-path attacker sprays forged packets with no source/authenticator check, so AV:N/PR:N; timing race against the real server keeps AC:H; full session impersonation gives C:H/I:H but no direct availability loss (A:N).

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenAM).

CVSS VectorVendor: https://github.com/OpenIdentityPlatform/OpenAM

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Summary

Description

An Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature (CWE-347) issue in OpenAM's RADIUS authentication module allows an unauthenticated network attacker to spoof an Access-Accept response and obtain an OpenAM session for any RADIUS username, without knowing the configured shared secret. This affects OpenAM Community Edition through version 16.0.6 and was patched in version 16.1.1.

The RADIUS client opens an unconnected datagram socket and treats the first UDP datagram delivered to its source port as authoritative. The receive path does not check the source IP/port, does not match the response identifier to the outstanding request, and does not verify the Response Authenticator (RFC 2865 §3); the RFC 2869 Message-Authenticator is neither sent nor required. Any non-Reject/non-Challenge packet is treated as success, so a forged Access-Accept is accepted as a valid login.

Impact

OpenAM Community Edition deployments through version 16.0.6 where an administrator has enabled a RADIUS module instance on a login chain are potentially affected. An attacker either races the real server on-path, or off-path sprays forged Access-Accept packets at the OpenAM client port. Because the client performs no verification of the response authenticator, no MD5 chosen-prefix forgery is required, which is is materially stronger than the BlastRADIUS family (CVE-2024-3596), in which an attacker must still forge a valid authenticator.

Successful exploitation yields pre-authentication impersonation of any RADIUS-mapped user in any affected realm. The resulting session is indistinguishable from a legitimate RADIUS login and carries the named principal's privileges.

Patch

This has been patched in OpenAM Community Edition version 16.1.1. Users are encouraged to update to the latest release.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

OpenAM Community Edition versions through 16.0.6 allow unauthenticated attackers to forge valid user sessions for any RADIUS-authenticated user without credentials. This authentication bypass directly undermines access controls and exposes all downstream systems to unauthorized account takeover for organizations relying on OpenAM. Immediate upgrade to version 16.1.1 is required to restore authentication integrity.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch: Upgrade to OpenAM Community Edition version 16.1.1 or later. No interim mitigations available; patching is the required remediation.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 92% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche open-source IAM fork; RADIUS module is non-default, limited enterprise footprint
Threat Intel
1
1 source
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

38
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2013-3900 MEDIUM
5.5 Dec 11

Why is Microsoft republishing a CVE from 2013? We are republishing CVE-2013-3900 in the Security Update Guide to update

CVE-2026-48558 CRITICAL POC
9.5 Jun 12

Authentication bypass in SimpleHelp 5.5.15 and prior (plus 6.0 pre-release builds) allows remote unauthenticated attacke

CVE-2026-5430 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Aug 06

Authentication bypass in WSO2 API Manager and related components (Universal Gateway, Traffic Manager, API Control Plane,

CVE-2025-59718 CRITICAL
9.8 Dec 09

Authentication bypass in Fortinet FortiOS, FortiProxy, and FortiSwitchManager allows unauthenticated remote attackers to

CVE-2025-25291 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Mar 12

ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. Rated critical severity (CVS

CVE-2026-47304 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 14

Security feature bypass in Microsoft .NET (shipped via Visual Studio 2022 17.12/17.14 and Visual Studio 2026 18.7) lets

CVE-2025-25292 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Mar 12

ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. Rated critical severity (CVS

CVE-2022-25898 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 01

The package jsrsasign before 10.5.25 are vulnerable to Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature when JWS or JWT

CVE-2026-107722 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 08

Authentication and authorization bypass in fast-jwt 6.2.0 through 6.2.4 (npm, NearForm) lets a remote, unauthenticated a

CVE-2024-42004 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 18

A library injection vulnerability exists in Microsoft Teams (work or school) 24046.2813.2770.1094 for macOS. Rated criti

CVE-2024-41145 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 18

A library injection vulnerability exists in the WebView.app helper app of Microsoft Teams (work or school) 24046.2813.27

CVE-2024-41138 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 18

A library injection vulnerability exists in the com.microsoft.teams2.modulehost.app helper app of Microsoft Teams (work

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy