Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessVictim installs malicious app
-
ExploitLaunch app on device
-
ExecutionApp abuses access-control flaw
-
ImpactRead user-sensitive data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Access control enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to get a malicious app installed and executed on the victim's device (AV:L, UI:R) - via App Store distribution, sideloading, or enterprise provisioning - running on a vulnerable OS build prior to iOS/iPadOS 26.6, macOS Tahoe 26.6, or visionOS 26.6. The app needs no special privileges (PR:N) but cannot be triggered remotely; there is no network-facing exposure. Limiting factors: local code execution is a prerequisite, the user must actively run the app, and impact is confined to reading sensitive data with no integrity or availability effect. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but low-priority issue. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, base 5.5) describes a LOCAL attack: a malicious or malformed app already present on the device abuses improper access control (CWE-284) to read user-sensitive data. Confidentiality impact is high but there is no integrity or availability impact, and exploitation requires the victim to install and run the attacker's app (UI:R). All exploitation signals point AWAY from urgency: EPSS is 0.19% (9th percentile), the CVE is NOT in CISA KEV, and no public exploit code is identified. No SSVC decision data was provided. The signals are internally consistent - a locally-scoped information-disclosure bug that Apple fixed proactively with 'improved checks.' The 'Authentication Bypass' tag overstates the issue; this is an access-control/data-exposure flaw, not an authentication bypass, and PR:N reflects that the malicious app needs no special privileges rather than any credential bypass. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker publishes a seemingly benign app to an App Store or sideloads it onto a target device; once the victim installs and launches it, the app abuses the access-control flaw to read user-sensitive data it should not have permission to see. No public exploit code exists and the attack is confined to the local device with no privilege escalation or system compromise. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 16, 2026
Improper access control in Apple iOS and iPadOS, macOS Tahoe, and visionOS lets a locally installed app read user-sensitive data that it should not be able to reach. The flaw (CWE-284) stems from insufficient validation checks and is remediated in iOS/iPadOS 26.6, macOS Tahoe 26.6, and visionOS 26.6; the assessed vector (CVSS 5.5, AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N) means exploitation requires the victim to install and launch a malicious app on an unpatched build, with no remote attack path and no integrity or availability impact. The attacker's app needs no special privileges, but there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is low at 0.19% (9th percentile), so this is a genuine but low-priority confidentiality issue.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: update to iOS 26.6 and iPadOS 26.6, macOS Tahoe 26.6, and visionOS 26.6 respectively, per the Apple advisories at https://support.apple.com/en-us/128066, https://support.apple.com/en-us/128067, and https://support.apple.com/en-us/128070. Because exploitation requires a malicious app to be installed and launched (AV:L, UI:R, PR:N), the most effective compensating controls until patching are app-provisioning ones: restrict installations to trusted App Store content, block or tightly govern sideloading, enterprise provisioning, and unmanaged configuration profiles (via MDM/managed device restrictions and supervised-device policies), and remove or audit untrusted/unnamed enterprise-signed apps - the trade-off being reduced user flexibility and administrative overhead for legitimate internal apps. Do not rely on network controls (firewalls, proxies, segmentation), since there is no network-facing exposure to block; likewise, endpoint antivirus and content filters offer limited value against a signed app that stays within the vendor's code-signing model. Note that revoking already-installed apps is not a substitute for the OS update, because the missing check lives in the operating system and the data exposure persists on unpatched builds.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 3 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
At the root of this issue is CWE-284 (Improper Access Control): Apple's operating systems rely on privacy and sandboxing enforcement layers - app sandbox profiles, entitlement checks, TCC-style user-data consent gates, and shared-container/permission validation - to prevent one app from reading another app's or the system's sensitive data. A gap in those checks means a third-party app, once running, can reach data outside its intended permission boundary. The CVSS vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N indicates the trigger is local (the app must execute on the device) with low attack complexity, no privileges required by the malicious app, and a required user interaction (launching/installing the app), while the only impact is a high confidentiality loss and no scope change, integrity, or availability effect - i.e. a read-only data exposure rather than code execution or tampering. The CPE data (cpe:2.3:a:apple:ios_and_ipados, cpe:2.3:a:apple:macos:*, cpe:2.3:a:apple:visionos:*) spans three Apple platform families, meaning the same underlying check was missing or weak across the shared codebase shipped in each OS. Apple's description ('addressed with improved checks') indicates the fix tightens validation or authorization logic rather than rewriting the subsystem, consistent with a permission-bypass class rather than a memory-safety flaw.
Know when macOS gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
A locally-installed app (AV:L) needing no privileges (PR:N) but requiring the user to run it (UI:R) reads sensitive data (C:H) with no integrity or availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (apple).
CVSS VectorVendor: apple
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
The issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.6 and iPadOS 26.6, macOS Tahoe 26.6, visionOS 26.6. An app may be able to access user-sensitive data.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
An unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote for Mac, a macOS remote control utility develope
Out-of-bounds write in Apple's iOS, iPadOS, and macOS file-parsing code lets remote attackers achieve arbitrary code exe
Apple's kernel across all platforms (iOS, macOS, watchOS, visionOS, tvOS) contains a memory corruption vulnerability (CV
The issue was addressed with improved checks. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.0). Actively exploited in the wild (cisa kev)
A logic issue was addressed with improved restrictions. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no authent
In Sudo before 1.9.12p2, the sudoedit (aka -e) feature mishandles extra arguments passed in the user-provided environmen
A race condition was addressed with additional validation. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.0), this vulnerability is no auth
This issue was addressed with improved checks. Rated critical severity (CVSS 10.0), this vulnerability is remotely explo
A carefully crafted request body can cause a buffer overflow in the mod_lua multipart parser (r:parsebody() called from
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Laundry on Linux, MacOS allows to perform an Account Takeover. This i
A vulnerability was found in LibTIFF. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no aut
Use of Out-of-range Pointer Offset in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2.4440. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this
EUVD-2026-77963
GHSA-x3rq-p5w2-c99j
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
VulDB
Exploit-DB