Skip to main content

Apple iOS CVE-2026-43762

| EUVDEUVD-2026-77963 MEDIUM
Improper Access Control (CWE-284)
2026-09-14 apple GHSA-x3rq-p5w2-c99j
5.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: apple
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Victim installs malicious app
  2. Exploit
    Launch app on device
  3. Execution
    App abuses access-control flaw
  4. Impact
    Read user-sensitive data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Access control enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to get a malicious app installed and executed on the victim's device (AV:L, UI:R) - via App Store distribution, sideloading, or enterprise provisioning - running on a vulnerable OS build prior to iOS/iPadOS 26.6, macOS Tahoe 26.6, or visionOS 26.6. The app needs no special privileges (PR:N) but cannot be triggered remotely; there is no network-facing exposure. Limiting factors: local code execution is a prerequisite, the user must actively run the app, and impact is confined to reading sensitive data with no integrity or availability effect.

Impact

This is a genuine but low-priority issue. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N, base 5.5) describes a LOCAL attack: a malicious or malformed app already present on the device abuses improper access control (CWE-284) to read user-sensitive data. Confidentiality impact is high but there is no integrity or availability impact, and exploitation requires the victim to install and run the attacker's app (UI:R). All exploitation signals point AWAY from urgency: EPSS is 0.19% (9th percentile), the CVE is NOT in CISA KEV, and no public exploit code is identified. No SSVC decision data was provided. The signals are internally consistent - a locally-scoped information-disclosure bug that Apple fixed proactively with 'improved checks.' The 'Authentication Bypass' tag overstates the issue; this is an access-control/data-exposure flaw, not an authentication bypass, and PR:N reflects that the malicious app needs no special privileges rather than any credential bypass.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker publishes a seemingly benign app to an App Store or sideloads it onto a target device; once the victim installs and launches it, the app abuses the access-control flaw to read user-sensitive data it should not have permission to see. No public exploit code exists and the attack is confined to the local device with no privilege escalation or system compromise.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 16, 2026

Improper access control in Apple iOS and iPadOS, macOS Tahoe, and visionOS lets a locally installed app read user-sensitive data that it should not be able to reach. The flaw (CWE-284) stems from insufficient validation checks and is remediated in iOS/iPadOS 26.6, macOS Tahoe 26.6, and visionOS 26.6; the assessed vector (CVSS 5.5, AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N) means exploitation requires the victim to install and launch a malicious app on an unpatched build, with no remote attack path and no integrity or availability impact. The attacker's app needs no special privileges, but there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and EPSS is low at 0.19% (9th percentile), so this is a genuine but low-priority confidentiality issue.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: update to iOS 26.6 and iPadOS 26.6, macOS Tahoe 26.6, and visionOS 26.6 respectively, per the Apple advisories at https://support.apple.com/en-us/128066, https://support.apple.com/en-us/128067, and https://support.apple.com/en-us/128070. Because exploitation requires a malicious app to be installed and launched (AV:L, UI:R, PR:N), the most effective compensating controls until patching are app-provisioning ones: restrict installations to trusted App Store content, block or tightly govern sideloading, enterprise provisioning, and unmanaged configuration profiles (via MDM/managed device restrictions and supervised-device policies), and remove or audit untrusted/unnamed enterprise-signed apps - the trade-off being reduced user flexibility and administrative overhead for legitimate internal apps. Do not rely on network controls (firewalls, proxies, segmentation), since there is no network-facing exposure to block; likewise, endpoint antivirus and content filters offer limited value against a signed app that stays within the vendor's code-signing model. Note that revoking already-installed apps is not a substitute for the OS update, because the missing check lives in the operating system and the data exposure persists on unpatched builds.

Affected VersionsENISA

iOS and iPadOS 0 <26.6
macOS 0 <26.6
visionOS 0 <26.6

Affected Packages

euvd ios_and_ipados fix: 26.6
euvd macos fix: 26.6
euvd visionos fix: 26.6

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 3 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

At the root of this issue is CWE-284 (Improper Access Control): Apple's operating systems rely on privacy and sandboxing enforcement layers - app sandbox profiles, entitlement checks, TCC-style user-data consent gates, and shared-container/permission validation - to prevent one app from reading another app's or the system's sensitive data. A gap in those checks means a third-party app, once running, can reach data outside its intended permission boundary. The CVSS vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N indicates the trigger is local (the app must execute on the device) with low attack complexity, no privileges required by the malicious app, and a required user interaction (launching/installing the app), while the only impact is a high confidentiality loss and no scope change, integrity, or availability effect - i.e. a read-only data exposure rather than code execution or tampering. The CPE data (cpe:2.3:a:apple:ios_and_ipados, cpe:2.3:a:apple:macos:*, cpe:2.3:a:apple:visionos:*) spans three Apple platform families, meaning the same underlying check was missing or weak across the shared codebase shipped in each OS. Apple's description ('addressed with improved checks') indicates the fix tightens validation or authorization logic rather than rewriting the subsystem, consistent with a permission-bypass class rather than a memory-safety flaw.

Know when macOS gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (apple) PRIMARY 5.5 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 5.5 MEDIUM

A locally-installed app (AV:L) needing no privileges (PR:N) but requiring the user to run it (UI:R) reads sensitive data (C:H) with no integrity or availability impact.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (apple).

CVSS VectorVendor: apple

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

4
CVSS changed
Sep 16, 2026 - 13:22 NVD
5.5 (MEDIUM)
Patch available
Sep 14, 2026 - 22:19 EUVD
CVE Published
Sep 14, 2026 - 20:47 cve.org
MEDIUM 5.5
CVE Published
Sep 14, 2026 - 20:47 cve.org
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)

DescriptionCVE.org

The issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in iOS 26.6 and iPadOS 26.6, macOS Tahoe 26.6, visionOS 26.6. An app may be able to access user-sensitive data.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 91% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
Apple iOS/iPadOS/macOS/visionOS run on a huge fraction of consumer and enterprise devices
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
High

Priority Score

28
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +28
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

More in macOS

View all
CVE-2025-34089 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 03

An unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote for Mac, a macOS remote control utility develope

CVE-2026-86950 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 28

Out-of-bounds write in Apple's iOS, iPadOS, and macOS file-parsing code lets remote attackers achieve arbitrary code exe

CVE-2026-20700 HIGH POC
7.8 Feb 11

Apple's kernel across all platforms (iOS, macOS, watchOS, visionOS, tvOS) contains a memory corruption vulnerability (CV

CVE-2022-48618 HIGH
7.0 Jan 09

The issue was addressed with improved checks. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.0). Actively exploited in the wild (cisa kev)

CVE-2024-27822 HIGH POC
7.8 May 14

A logic issue was addressed with improved restrictions. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no authent

CVE-2023-22809 HIGH POC
7.8 Jan 18

In Sudo before 1.9.12p2, the sudoedit (aka -e) feature mishandles extra arguments passed in the user-provided environmen

CVE-2022-46689 HIGH POC
7.0 Dec 15

A race condition was addressed with additional validation. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.0), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2022-32845 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Sep 23

This issue was addressed with improved checks. Rated critical severity (CVSS 10.0), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2021-44790 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 20

A carefully crafted request body can cause a buffer overflow in the mod_lua multipart parser (r:parsebody() called from

CVE-2025-52841 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Laundry on Linux, MacOS allows to perform an Account Takeover. This i

CVE-2022-3970 HIGH POC
8.8 Nov 13

A vulnerability was found in LibTIFF. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no aut

CVE-2022-0729 HIGH POC
8.8 Feb 23

Use of Out-of-range Pointer Offset in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2.4440. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy