Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Identify exposed RDP listener
  2. Delivery
    Connect to TCP/3389
  3. Exploit
    Send malformed RDP PDU
  4. Execution
    Trigger out-of-bounds read in parser
  5. Persist
    Receive leaked memory in response
  6. Impact
    Harvest secrets across repeated connections

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, read limits
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Collection

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires only network reachability to the RDP listener (typically TCP/3389) on a vulnerable Windows host with Remote Desktop enabled; per CVSS PR:N/UI:N no credentials and no user interaction are needed, and AC:L indicates no special timing or environmental conditions. Limiting factors are that RDP must be enabled and reachable from the attacker (hosts with RDP disabled, firewalled off, or fronted by a Remote Desktop Gateway requiring pre-authentication are not directly exposed), and the primitive is read-only (C:H, I:N, A:N) so it leaks data but does not by itself give code execution, write, or denial-of-service capability.

Impact

The CVSS vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N describes a fully remote, low-complexity, unauthenticated read primitive with high confidentiality impact and no integrity or availability effect - a profile that historically maps to high real-world interest because RDP is broadly exposed on the public internet. However, EPSS data was not provided in the input, the CVE is not in CISA KEV, and no POC has been observed, so present-day exploitation likelihood cannot be quantitatively measured from the data given. The 'Buffer Overflow' tag in the input is inconsistent with CWE-125 (an out-of-bounds read, not a write/overflow); treat this as a tagging artifact rather than evidence of code execution potential. Practical risk should be considered elevated wherever RDP is internet-exposed, but absent KEV/POC signals this should be prioritized below any actively exploited RDP RCE issue.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker reachable on the network to a vulnerable Windows host with RDP listening sends crafted RDP protocol messages during connection setup that trigger the out-of-bounds read, and observes leaked process memory returned in protocol responses or error data. Repeated connections can be used to harvest fragments such as session tokens, kernel pointers useful for ASLR bypass, or other secrets resident in the RDP service. No POC has been identified at time of analysis.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 09, 2026

Information disclosure in Microsoft Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to read out-of-bounds memory contents over the network, potentially leaking sensitive data from the RDP service process. The vulnerability requires no authentication or user interaction and is rated CVSS 7.5 with high confidentiality impact only. At time of analysis there is no public exploit identified and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory: apply the Microsoft security update referenced at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42908 for every affected Windows client and Windows Server build in the environment as identified on that page. Where immediate patching is not feasible, restrict TCP/3389 (and UDP/3389) at perimeter and host firewalls so RDP is not reachable from the internet, place RDP behind a Remote Desktop Gateway or VPN that performs pre-authentication, and require Network Level Authentication (NLA) on RD Session Hosts so that protocol parsing only occurs after CredSSP authentication - these controls reduce, but do not eliminate, exposure to an internal attacker and may break legacy or kiosk-style RDP clients that cannot perform NLA.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5256
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.8655
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23228
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9234
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.32995
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.8655
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.8880
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26132
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.2269
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.8880
Windows 11 Version 23H2 10.0.22631.0 <10.0.22631.7219
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9234
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9234
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.32995
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.8880
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7417
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26132
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23228
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19045.7417
Windows App Client for Windows Desktop 1.00 <2.0.1193.0

Affected Packages

microsoft windows_10_version_1607_10_0_14393_9234 fix: Windows 10 Version 1607 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.14393.9234, Windows 10 Version 1607 for x64-based Systems 10.0.14393.9234
microsoft windows_10_version_1809_10_0_17763_8880 fix: Windows 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.17763.8880, Windows 10 Version 1809 for x64-based Systems 10.0.17763.8880
microsoft windows_10_version_21h2_10_0_19044_7417 fix: Windows 10 Version 21H2 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.19044.7417, Windows 10 Version 21H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.19044.7417, Windows 10 Version 21H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.19044.7417
microsoft windows_10_version_22h2_10_0_19045_7417 fix: Windows 10 Version 22H2 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.19045.7417, Windows 10 Version 22H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.19045.7417, Windows 10 Version 22H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.19045.7417
microsoft windows_11_version_23h2_10_0_22631_7219 fix: Windows 11 Version 23H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.22631.7219, Windows 11 Version 23H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.22631.7219
microsoft windows_11_version_24h2_10_0_26100_8655 fix: Windows 11 Version 24H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.26100.8655, Windows 11 Version 24H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.26100.8655
microsoft windows_11_version_25h2_10_0_26200_8655 fix: Windows 11 Version 25H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.26200.8655, Windows 11 Version 25H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.26200.8655
microsoft windows_11_version_26h1_10_0_28000_2269 fix: Windows 11 Version 26H1 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.28000.2269, Windows 11 version 26H1 for x64-based Systems 10.0.28000.2269
microsoft windows_app_client_for_windows_desktop_2_0_1193_0 fix: Windows App Client for Windows Desktop 2.0.1193.0
microsoft windows_server_2012_6_2_9200_26132 fix: Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.26132, Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.26132
microsoft windows_server_2012_r2_6_3_9600_23228 fix: Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.23228, Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.23228
microsoft windows_server_2016_10_0_14393_9234 fix: Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.9234, Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.9234
microsoft windows_server_2019_10_0_17763_8880 fix: Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.8880, Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.8880
microsoft windows_server_2022_10_0_20348_5256 fix: Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.5256, Windows Server 2022 (Server Core installation) 10.0.20348.5256
microsoft windows_server_2025_10_0_26100_32995 fix: Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.32995, Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.32995
euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9234
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.8880
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7417
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19045.7417
euvd windows_11_version_23h2 fix: 10.0.22631.7219
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.8655
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.8655
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.2269
euvd windows_app_client_for_windows_desktop fix: 2.0.1193.0
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26132
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23228
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23228
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26132
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9234
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9234
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.8880
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.8880
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5256
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.32995
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.32995

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 35 packages in microsoft, euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is an out-of-bounds read (CWE-125) in the Windows implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol, the proprietary Microsoft protocol (typically TCP/3389) used for remote graphical session access. CWE-125 conditions arise when input-derived offsets or length fields are used to index into a buffer without sufficient bounds validation, causing the parser to read adjacent process memory. In an RDP context this typically manifests during early protocol handshake or PDU/virtual channel parsing in the RDP service handling untrusted client-supplied messages, with leaked memory returned to the attacker via protocol responses or error paths.

Know when Windows 10 1607 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CIRCL (temporal) 6.5 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

Out-of-bounds read in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Microsoft Windows RDP deployments face unauthorized data access risk through a network-based memory exposure flaw that bypasses authentication entirely. Affected organizations risk exposure of session credentials, encryption keys, and internal communications data stored in RDP service memory. No vendor-released patch is currently available, making immediate network-level protections essential.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations include: (1) Network segmentation-restrict RDP access to internal networks only, behind VPN and firewall rules limiting to authorized subnets; (2) Access restrictions-enable multi-factor authentication for RDP; limit RDP logon rights to required administrative accounts; (3) Endpoint detection-enable RDP event logging; deploy EDR to detect abnormal memory access patterns; (4) Service hardening-enforce Network Layer Authentication; disable high-risk RDP features (clipboard redirection, USB device redirection, drive mapping); (5) Traffic analysis-implement monitoring for reconnaissance attempts and unusual RDP connection patterns.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 76% exploitable
Vendor Action
See Below
Required. The vulnerability documented by this CVE requires customer action to resolve.
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

38
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2024-30088 HIGH POC
7.0 Jun 11

Windows Kernel contains a TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allowing local privilege escalation, exploited by the OilR

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy