Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAcquire WordPress contributor credentials
-
DeliveryAuthenticate to target site
-
ExploitSubmit arbitrary post IDs to ECS repeater data source endpoint
-
ExecutionBypass ownership and status checks
-
PersistRead custom field values from private and draft posts
-
ImpactExfiltrate sensitive post metadata
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V14 - Data Protection Data exposure prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Collection, Discovery The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires a valid contributor-level (or higher) WordPress account on the target site - editors, authors, and administrators are also affected but typically already have broader access. The specific vulnerable component is the ECS plugin's dynamic repeater data source, which must be installed and active in a version below 4.3.10. No non-default server configuration or special network position is required beyond authenticated HTTP access to the WordPress installation. Exploitation is limited by the SSVC Automatable: no assessment, meaning mass unauthenticated scanning is not viable - an attacker must first acquire credentials. The absence of a CISA KEV listing and the low EPSS percentile further indicate this is not being exploited at scale. Risk is highest in multi-author WordPress sites where contributor access is granted to semi-trusted or external users, where those users could enumerate and read metadata from private or draft posts authored by others. |
| Impact | The CVSS 6.5 (Medium) vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N is internally consistent: network-exploitable with low complexity but gated behind at least contributor-level authentication (PR:L), with high confidentiality impact and no integrity or availability effect. The SSVC assessment (Exploitation: poc, Automatable: no, Technical Impact: partial) corroborates this - a public proof-of-concept lowers the bar, but the non-automatable flag reflects the need for valid credentials rather than unauthenticated mass scanning. EPSS at 0.15% (5th percentile) signals that exploitation has not been widely observed, and no CISA KEV listing exists. The practical risk is highest in multi-author WordPress environments where contributor accounts are issued to less-trusted users; in single-author or tightly controlled deployments, the realistic threat is significantly reduced. The C:H rating is contingent on what post meta is actually stored - if custom fields contain API keys, credentials, or sensitive draft content, real-world impact escalates. No data conflicts across sources are present; all signals are consistent. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has obtained or registered a contributor-level WordPress account on a target site running ECS plugin below 4.3.10 crafts HTTP requests to the plugin's dynamic repeater data source endpoint, supplying post IDs belonging to posts they do not own. By iterating numeric post IDs, the attacker retrieves custom field values and metadata from private drafts or other restricted posts, potentially exfiltrating unpublished editorial content, embedded API keys, or sensitive configuration data. The WPScan-published proof-of-concept lowers the technical barrier for this attack, requiring only authenticated WordPress access. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 17, 2026
Missing authorization checks in the ECS WordPress plugin before 4.3.10 allow any contributor-level or higher user to read custom field values and post metadata from WordPress posts they do not own, including private and draft content. The plugin's dynamic repeater data source feature accepts user-supplied post identifiers without validating ownership or post publication status, exposing potentially sensitive metadata to lower-privileged authenticated users. A publicly available proof-of-concept exists via WPScan, though EPSS at 0.15% (5th percentile) indicates limited observed exploitation activity and no CISA KEV listing has been issued.
RemediationAI
Update the ECS WordPress plugin to version 4.3.10 or later, which is the vendor-released patched version per the WPScan advisory at https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/0d4ccc34-632a-4058-9220-b3cce7a942dd/. Updates can be applied via the WordPress admin dashboard under Plugins > Installed Plugins > ECS > Update, or via WP-CLI with 'wp plugin update ecs'. If immediate patching is not possible, consider deactivating the ECS plugin entirely until the update is applied - this eliminates the vulnerability at the cost of losing all plugin functionality. As a secondary control, audit and restrict contributor-level account creation to reduce the pool of users who could exploit this flaw; however, this is a compensating measure and does not fix the underlying authorization gap. Additionally, audit custom field usage to identify whether sensitive values such as API keys or credentials are stored in post meta, as this determines the real-world data exposure scope.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The ECS WordPress plugin implements a dynamic repeater feature that fetches custom field values using a caller-supplied post ID parameter. WordPress post meta (custom fields) is a key-value store associated with each post, commonly used to hold configuration settings, API credentials, editor-facing data, or unpublished editorial content. The root cause maps to CWE-200 (Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor): the plugin reads and returns post meta for an arbitrary post ID without checking whether the requesting user has read permission for that post, or whether the post's status (private, draft, pending) restricts visibility. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:unknown:ecs:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* reflects an unresolved vendor identifier in NVD enrichment; WPScan is the authoritative reporting source. This class of flaw - broken object-level authorization on internal WordPress API calls - is common in plugins that build dynamic content blocks without re-validating WordPress capability and post-visibility rules.
Know when Ecs gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Network-accessible via HTTP with contributor credentials (PR:L, AC:L); confidentiality impact High because private post meta may contain sensitive data; no integrity or availability impact applies.
Primary rating from Vendor (WPScan).
CVSS VectorVendor: WPScan
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
The ECS WordPress plugin before 4.3.10 does not perform ownership or post-status checks when one of its dynamic repeater data sources reads custom field values from a user-supplied post identifier, allowing users with a contributor-level account or above to read custom field values and post metadata from posts they do not own, including private and draft ones.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
CSV formula injection in Dell ECS 3.8.1.0 through 3.8.1.7 and in Dell ObjectScale versions prior to 4.3.0.0 allows remot
Hard-coded credentials in Dell ECS 3.8.1.0-3.8.1.7 and ObjectScale <4.3.0.0 allow unauthenticated filesystem access. Des
Broken access control in the Identity and Access Management (IAM) module of Dell ECS (Elastic Cloud Storage) 3.5 and 3.6
Improper privilege management in Dell ECS 3.8.1.0-3.8.1.7 and ObjectScale prior to 4.3.0.0 allows high-privileged local
Local privilege escalation in Dell ECS 3.8.1.0 through 3.8.1.7 and Dell ObjectScale prior to 4.4.0.0 allows an attacker
Authentication bypass in Dell ECS Geo replication (versions 3.8.1.0-3.8.1.7) and Dell ObjectScale (prior to 4.3.0.0) all
EUVD-2026-59913
GHSA-4p53-g645-qhr2
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB