EUVD-2026-102828
GHSA-mv4w-jq9r-p823
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessIdentify exposed Costifier instance
-
ExploitReach leftover debug/non-production interface
-
ExecutionQuery debug endpoint unauthenticated
-
ImpactDisclose sensitive application information
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires that the Costifier deployment leaves an active debug/diagnostic (non-production) code path or interface enabled and network-reachable in a production environment - this is the specific precondition implied by CWE-489 and the 'Exploit Non-Production Interfaces' impact. Per the CVSS vector (PR:N/UI:N/AC:L), no authentication, no user interaction, and no special complexity are needed once that debug interface is exposed. The practical limiting factors are: the instance must be network-accessible to the attacker, the debug interface must not have been disabled or firewalled off, and impact is confined to confidentiality (C:L) with no integrity or availability effect; affected versions are those released through 2026-10-16. |
| Impact | This is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) active debug code flaw (CWE-489) that exposes a non-production/debug interface in SFM Software Technologies' Costifier application. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N) indicates a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated issue with limited confidentiality impact only - no integrity or availability effect - which is consistent with the 'Information Disclosure' tag and the 'Exploit Non-Production Interfaces' impact. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or public POC was provided in the input, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and no evidence of active exploitation; the signals are not conflicting, they are simply limited to the single TR-CERT advisory. Real-world risk is bounded by the modest technical impact (partial confidentiality only) and, critically, by the apparent obscurity and small deployment footprint of the product. This is therefore a genuine but low-priority issue for most organizations - relevant primarily to the narrow set of Costifier operators - rather than a widespread emergency, and it is complicated by the vendor's non-response, meaning no official patch or fixed version is confirmed. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A remote, unauthenticated attacker discovers a Costifier instance reachable over the network and sends requests to a leftover debug/diagnostic (non-production) interface that was not disabled in production. Because no authentication is required and complexity is low, the attacker retrieves sensitive application information (configuration, diagnostic, or internal state data) exposed through that interface. No public exploit code is identified at time of analysis, so exploitation would rely on manual probing of the debug endpoint. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 16, 2026
Exposed debug/diagnostic interfaces in SFM Software Technologies Inc.'s Costifier application let unauthenticated remote attackers reach non-production code paths in production deployments, resulting in limited information disclosure. The flaw carries a medium-severity CVSS 3.1 base score of 5.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N), meaning no credentials, no user interaction, and no special conditions are needed once the debug interface is network-reachable; integrity and availability are unaffected. All Costifier versions released through 2026-10-16 are in scope, the vendor was contacted but did not respond, and no public exploit identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis - the vendor was contacted early about the disclosure and did not respond, so there is no fixed version to point to and the TR-CERT advisory at https://siberguvenlik.gov.tr/guvenlik-bildirimleri/detay/tr-26-1349 is currently the only authoritative reference. Until a fix is published, treat this as a configuration and exposure problem: locate and turn off any debug, diagnostic, or non-production mode in the Costifier deployment (disable debug flags, remove test/health-diagnostic endpoints that are not operationally required, and suppress verbose error output), then verify externally that the interface is no longer answering; the trade-off is reduced troubleshooting telemetry, so keep verbose logging in a local file rather than on a reachable endpoint. Where the debug functionality cannot be removed, block it at the network layer - restrict the application to an internal management segment, add deny rules for the debug paths on the reverse proxy/WAF, and require VPN or IP allowlisting for administrative access; the trade-off is that legitimate support and monitoring integrations using the same path will break unless explicitly allowlisted. Because impact is confidentiality-only and reconnaissance-oriented, also rotate any secrets, tokens, or infrastructure details that may have leaked through the debug output and review access logs for probing of diagnostic URLs. Monitor the TR-CERT advisory and the vendor's channels for a patched release, and re-test exposure after any upgrade.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause class is CWE-489 (Active Debug Code): non-production artifacts - debug consoles, verbose diagnostics, test endpoints, stack traces, or configuration/state dumps - remain enabled and routable in a production Costifier instance. The provided CPE string cpe:2.3:a:sfm_software_technologies_inc.:costifier:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* uses a wildcard version, indicating the flaw is attributed to the product line broadly rather than to a single build, and the description scope 'through 2026-10-16' marks the boundary of versions covered by this disclosure. Because the CVSS vector is PR:N/UI:N/AC:L, exploitation is a matter of reaching the exposed interface over the network; the assessment notes the only real gating factors are that the instance is network-accessible and that the debug path has not been disabled or firewalled. This is not a memory-safety, injection, or authentication-bypass primitive: the sole impact is confidentiality (C:L) - typically disclosure of build metadata, environment details, internal paths, or limited application state that is useful for reconnaissance and follow-on attacks rather than direct compromise.
Know when Costifier gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Network-reachable debug interface needing no auth or interaction (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N); impact limited to partial information disclosure, hence C:L with I:N/A:N.
Primary rating from Vendor (TR-CERT).
CVSS VectorVendor: TR-CERT
DescriptionCVE.org
Active debug code vulnerability in SFM Software Technologies Inc. Costifier allows Exploit Non-Production Interfaces.
This issue affects Costifier: through 2026-10-16. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Threat Intelligence Overview
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Exploit-DB