Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain root access to RHEL host
-
DeliveryLocate LDBM database directory
-
ExploitRead raw encrypted attribute bytes
-
ExecutionCompare ciphertext blocks across entries
-
ImpactIdentify entries sharing identical encrypted values
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V11 - Cryptography Random IV generation
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the following specific conditions: (1) the attacker must have privileged local filesystem access to the LDBM database directory - consistent with the CVSS AV:L/PR:H vector, this means root-level or equivalent OS access to the host running 389-ds-base; (2) the 389-ds-base instance must be configured with attribute-level encryption enabled on one or more attributes using AES-CBC or 3DES-CBC - this is a non-default configuration that must be explicitly activated by a directory administrator; (3) the target attributes must store values where equality is meaningful (e.g., hashed credentials, unique identifiers, PII fields). Exploitation is limited by: the requirement for pre-existing privileged OS access (meaning the host is already compromised); the non-default nature of LDBM attribute encryption (only organizations that specifically opted into this feature are affected); and the passive nature of the attack (no code execution, no network path, no user interaction required). The attacker cannot recover plaintext values - only detect that two ciphertexts represent the same underlying plaintext. |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N) scores 4.4 Medium, and the vector is internally consistent with the described attack: local access (AV:L) with high privileges (PR:H) is required to read raw LDBM database files, which are normally restricted to the directory server process and root. The C:H rating reflects the potential sensitivity of encrypted attributes (identity data, credentials, PII) and the fact that equality detection across entries can constitute a meaningful confidentiality breach in high-assurance deployments. No EPSS score was provided in the input data; given the high privilege bar and the passive, non-exploitable nature of the flaw (no code execution path), real-world exploitation probability is expected to be very low in practice. The CVE is not in the CISA KEV catalog, and no POC or active exploitation evidence has been provided. The primary real-world risk is insider threat or post-compromise forensic analysis: an attacker who has already achieved root on the RHEL host could leverage this to correlate directory entries without triggering authentication-layer auditing. For most organizations, the exploit precondition (privileged filesystem access) represents a breach condition already - this vulnerability adds incremental exposure beyond that baseline rather than enabling initial access. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has escalated to root on a RHEL host running Red Hat Directory Server opens the LDBM database files directly (e.g., using a Berkeley DB tool or raw file reads on /var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-instance/db/) and extracts the raw ciphertext bytes for an encrypted attribute such as a personal identifier or credential field across multiple user entries. Because the static IV causes identical plaintext values to encrypt to identical ciphertext, the attacker can group entries by ciphertext equality - for example, confirming which users share the same attribute value - without needing the encryption key or recovering any actual plaintext. No public proof-of-concept code has been identified at time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 07, 2026
Attribute encryption in the 389-ds-base LDBM backend exposes a cryptographic design flaw affecting Red Hat Directory Server 11, 12, and 13 across all supported RHEL releases (6 through 10). The LDBM backend applies a static, hardcoded initialization vector (IV) for both AES-CBC and 3DES-CBC encryption of directory attribute values, meaning that two entries storing identical plaintext for an encrypted attribute will always produce identical ciphertext blocks - a classic ciphertext equality oracle. An attacker with privileged filesystem-level read access to the LDBM database files can exploit this to determine whether any two encrypted attribute values are identical, leaking relational information about the directory without recovering plaintext. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and this CVE is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
RemediationAI
No patched package version was explicitly identified in the provided input data; the Red Hat CVE advisory (https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-14969) and Bugzilla entry (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2497735) should be monitored for errata releases targeting 389-ds-base on the affected RHEL releases. Until a patch is available, organizations that rely on LDBM attribute encryption for sensitive fields should consider the following compensating controls: restrict filesystem access to the LDBM database directory (typically /var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-<instance>/db/) using file ACLs to the directory server UID only, eliminating the ability of non-root users to perform offline ciphertext comparison; enforce SELinux in enforcing mode with the dirsrv policy active, which limits read access to LDBM files even for privileged system users; and audit root-level access to LDBM data directories via auditd rules on directory read/open syscalls. Note that restricting filesystem permissions does not eliminate risk for accounts with legitimate root access. Rotating encrypted attribute values after a patch is applied may be advisable if the directory has been exposed to unauthorized root-level access, since pre-existing ciphertexts encrypted under the static IV will remain comparably vulnerable.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
389-ds-base is the upstream community project for Red Hat Directory Server, an LDAP directory service packaged in RHEL. The LDBM (Lightweight Database Manager) backend is the local persistent storage layer for directory entries. When attribute-level encryption is configured, 389-ds-base is supposed to encrypt sensitive attribute values (e.g., userPassword-equivalent fields, personal identifiers) using AES-CBC or 3DES-CBC before writing them to disk. CBC (Cipher Block Chaining) mode is semantically secure only when each encryption operation uses a unique, unpredictable IV. CWE-329 (Not Using an Unpredictable IV with CBC Mode) captures exactly this failure: using a fixed/static IV eliminates the randomization that prevents ciphertext blocks from leaking information about plaintext relationships. The result is that AES-CBC or 3DES-CBC with a static IV degenerates into a deterministic cipher for the first block, making identical plaintexts always produce identical ciphertexts. Affected CPEs span cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_directory_server_11 through _13 and cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_6 through _10.
Know when Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Local filesystem access with high OS privileges required; no integrity or availability impact; confidentiality high given sensitivity of encrypted directory attributes.
Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).
CVSS VectorNVD
DescriptionNVD
A flaw was found in 389-ds-base where the LDBM backend attribute encryption uses a hardcoded static initialization vector for AES-CBC and 3DES-CBC operations, allowing an attacker with privileged filesystem access to detect plaintext equality across encrypted entries by comparing ciphertext blocks.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Affected Products (CPE)NVD
More in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
View allHeap corruption via double-free in 389-ds-base's LDAP control parsing allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash
Remote code execution in Cockpit's web interface allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the h
Remote code execution in Samba's printing subsystem allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary shell commands via craft
Ghostscript can execute arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of its process when it renders a crafted PostScript
Use-after-free in librsvg during rendering of crafted SVG documents with nested XInclude directives and duplicate entity
A signed integer overflow vulnerability exists in the libtiff library's putcontig8bitYCbCr44tile function that leads to
The system CA trust store shipped in Red Hat's ca-certificates RPM packages includes eMudhra root authorities that signe
Authentication bypass in 389 Directory Server (shipped as Red Hat Directory Server 11-13 and within RHEL 6-10) lets remo
Remote code execution and privilege escalation in HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and Printing) affects the hpcups print filter
Unauthenticated privilege escalation in FreeIPA (Red Hat Identity Management) allows a remote attacker to gain genuine a
A heap buffer overflow exists in libsoup's WebSocket permessage-deflate compression path: when a very large outbound mes
Remote code execution in libarchive on 32-bit systems allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code via spe
Same weakness CWE-329 – Generation of Predictable IV with CBC Mode
View allSame technique Information Disclosure
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Moderate| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.1 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE CaaS Platform 4.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Enterprise Storage 6 | Affected |
| SUSE Enterprise Storage 7 | Affected |
| SUSE Enterprise Storage 7.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP1-BCL | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP1-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2-BCL | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3-BCL | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.2 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.2 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.2 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.3 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.4 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.5 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
| suse/389-ds | Affected |
EUVD-2026-42052
GHSA-9458-4323-hx4r
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB