Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain root access to RHEL host
  2. Delivery
    Locate LDBM database directory
  3. Exploit
    Read raw encrypted attribute bytes
  4. Execution
    Compare ciphertext blocks across entries
  5. Impact
    Identify entries sharing identical encrypted values

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V11 - Cryptography Random IV generation
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the following specific conditions: (1) the attacker must have privileged local filesystem access to the LDBM database directory - consistent with the CVSS AV:L/PR:H vector, this means root-level or equivalent OS access to the host running 389-ds-base; (2) the 389-ds-base instance must be configured with attribute-level encryption enabled on one or more attributes using AES-CBC or 3DES-CBC - this is a non-default configuration that must be explicitly activated by a directory administrator; (3) the target attributes must store values where equality is meaningful (e.g., hashed credentials, unique identifiers, PII fields). Exploitation is limited by: the requirement for pre-existing privileged OS access (meaning the host is already compromised); the non-default nature of LDBM attribute encryption (only organizations that specifically opted into this feature are affected); and the passive nature of the attack (no code execution, no network path, no user interaction required). The attacker cannot recover plaintext values - only detect that two ciphertexts represent the same underlying plaintext.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N) scores 4.4 Medium, and the vector is internally consistent with the described attack: local access (AV:L) with high privileges (PR:H) is required to read raw LDBM database files, which are normally restricted to the directory server process and root. The C:H rating reflects the potential sensitivity of encrypted attributes (identity data, credentials, PII) and the fact that equality detection across entries can constitute a meaningful confidentiality breach in high-assurance deployments. No EPSS score was provided in the input data; given the high privilege bar and the passive, non-exploitable nature of the flaw (no code execution path), real-world exploitation probability is expected to be very low in practice. The CVE is not in the CISA KEV catalog, and no POC or active exploitation evidence has been provided. The primary real-world risk is insider threat or post-compromise forensic analysis: an attacker who has already achieved root on the RHEL host could leverage this to correlate directory entries without triggering authentication-layer auditing. For most organizations, the exploit precondition (privileged filesystem access) represents a breach condition already - this vulnerability adds incremental exposure beyond that baseline rather than enabling initial access.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has escalated to root on a RHEL host running Red Hat Directory Server opens the LDBM database files directly (e.g., using a Berkeley DB tool or raw file reads on /var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-instance/db/) and extracts the raw ciphertext bytes for an encrypted attribute such as a personal identifier or credential field across multiple user entries. Because the static IV causes identical plaintext values to encrypt to identical ciphertext, the attacker can group entries by ciphertext equality - for example, confirming which users share the same attribute value - without needing the encryption key or recovering any actual plaintext. No public proof-of-concept code has been identified at time of analysis.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 07, 2026

Attribute encryption in the 389-ds-base LDBM backend exposes a cryptographic design flaw affecting Red Hat Directory Server 11, 12, and 13 across all supported RHEL releases (6 through 10). The LDBM backend applies a static, hardcoded initialization vector (IV) for both AES-CBC and 3DES-CBC encryption of directory attribute values, meaning that two entries storing identical plaintext for an encrypted attribute will always produce identical ciphertext blocks - a classic ciphertext equality oracle. An attacker with privileged filesystem-level read access to the LDBM database files can exploit this to determine whether any two encrypted attribute values are identical, leaking relational information about the directory without recovering plaintext. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and this CVE is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

RemediationAI

No patched package version was explicitly identified in the provided input data; the Red Hat CVE advisory (https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-14969) and Bugzilla entry (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2497735) should be monitored for errata releases targeting 389-ds-base on the affected RHEL releases. Until a patch is available, organizations that rely on LDBM attribute encryption for sensitive fields should consider the following compensating controls: restrict filesystem access to the LDBM database directory (typically /var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-<instance>/db/) using file ACLs to the directory server UID only, eliminating the ability of non-root users to perform offline ciphertext comparison; enforce SELinux in enforcing mode with the dirsrv policy active, which limits read access to LDBM files even for privileged system users; and audit root-level access to LDBM data directories via auditd rules on directory read/open syscalls. Note that restricting filesystem permissions does not eliminate risk for accounts with legitimate root access. Rotating encrypted attribute values after a patch is applied may be advisable if the directory has been exposed to unauthorized root-level access, since pre-existing ciphertexts encrypted under the static IV will remain comparably vulnerable.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

389-ds-base is the upstream community project for Red Hat Directory Server, an LDAP directory service packaged in RHEL. The LDBM (Lightweight Database Manager) backend is the local persistent storage layer for directory entries. When attribute-level encryption is configured, 389-ds-base is supposed to encrypt sensitive attribute values (e.g., userPassword-equivalent fields, personal identifiers) using AES-CBC or 3DES-CBC before writing them to disk. CBC (Cipher Block Chaining) mode is semantically secure only when each encryption operation uses a unique, unpredictable IV. CWE-329 (Not Using an Unpredictable IV with CBC Mode) captures exactly this failure: using a fixed/static IV eliminates the randomization that prevents ciphertext blocks from leaking information about plaintext relationships. The result is that AES-CBC or 3DES-CBC with a static IV degenerates into a deterministic cipher for the first block, making identical plaintexts always produce identical ciphertexts. Affected CPEs span cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_directory_server_11 through _13 and cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_6 through _10.

Know when Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (redhat) PRIMARY MEDIUM
NVD 4.4 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 4.4 MEDIUM

Local filesystem access with high OS privileges required; no integrity or availability impact; confidentiality high given sensitivity of encrypted directory attributes.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE MEDIUM
Red Hat 4.4 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

DescriptionNVD

A flaw was found in 389-ds-base where the LDBM backend attribute encryption uses a hardcoded static initialization vector for AES-CBC and 3DES-CBC operations, allowing an attacker with privileged filesystem access to detect plaintext equality across encrypted entries by comparing ciphertext blocks.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 100% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
enterprise LDAP server on RHEL, not universally deployed
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

22
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +22
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Affected Products (CPE)NVD

cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_directory_server_11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_directory_server_12:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_directory_server_13:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
CVE-2026-18663 MEDIUM
5.9 Aug 12

Heap corruption via double-free in 389-ds-base's LDAP control parsing allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash

CVE-2026-4631 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 07

Remote code execution in Cockpit's web interface allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the h

CVE-2026-4480 CRITICAL POC
9.0 May 26

Remote code execution in Samba's printing subsystem allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary shell commands via craft

CVE-2026-101258 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 06

Ghostscript can execute arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of its process when it renders a crafted PostScript

CVE-2026-96889 HIGH POC
7.8 Sep 23

Use-after-free in librsvg during rendering of crafted SVG documents with nested XInclude directives and duplicate entity

CVE-2026-4775 HIGH POC
7.8 Mar 24

A signed integer overflow vulnerability exists in the libtiff library's putcontig8bitYCbCr44tile function that leads to

CVE-2026-114406 MEDIUM POC
6.8 Oct 21

The system CA trust store shipped in Red Hat's ca-certificates RPM packages includes eMudhra root authorities that signe

CVE-2026-18922 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 07

Authentication bypass in 389 Directory Server (shipped as Red Hat Directory Server 11-13 and within RHEL 6-10) lets remo

CVE-2026-14544 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 03

Remote code execution and privilege escalation in HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and Printing) affects the hpcups print filter

CVE-2026-76578 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 07

Unauthenticated privilege escalation in FreeIPA (Red Hat Identity Management) allows a remote attacker to gain genuine a

CVE-2026-102560 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 29

A heap buffer overflow exists in libsoup's WebSocket permessage-deflate compression path: when a very large outbound mes

CVE-2026-5121 HIGH
7.5 Mar 30

Remote code execution in libarchive on 32-bit systems allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code via spe

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Moderate
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 Affected
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.1 Affected

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy