Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessLure victim via social engineering
-
ExploitDeliver crafted network traffic to Chromoting
-
ExecutionSpoof Chromoting UI elements
-
ImpactDeceive user into trusting falsified interface
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V3 - Web Frontend Security UI security representation
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires the victim to be running Google Chrome's Chromoting (Chrome Remote Desktop) component on Windows at a version prior to 155.0.8059.39, and requires the victim to interact with the session (UI:R) under attacker social-engineering pressure. The attacker must be positioned to deliver crafted network traffic to the Chromoting connection. Limiting factors: mandatory user interaction plus social engineering (not automatable), dependence on the Chromoting feature being actively in use rather than a default always-on surface, Windows-only scope, and no elevation of impact beyond UI spoofing (no code execution or authenticated access granted). |
| Impact | This is a genuinely low-priority issue despite its network attack vector. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L) yields a base score of 5.4 (medium), but two factors heavily constrain real-world risk: UI:R means the attack cannot succeed without victim interaction, and the description explicitly requires social engineering, so exploitation is not automatable. Google's own Chromium severity rating is 'Low,' which aligns with the limited technical impact (UI spoofing, not code execution or data theft). No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or public exploit code was provided in the intelligence, so there is no evidence of exploitation probability or active use. Exploitation status: no public exploit identified at time of analysis. One internal inconsistency to verify: the official vector lists A:L (low availability impact), which is unusual for a pure UI-misrepresentation flaw (CWE-451) where the expected impact is integrity/confidentiality of displayed information - verify the availability impact with the vendor advisory. Overall, this ranks well below Chrome's actively-exploited RCE and sandbox-escape bugs and should be remediated via normal patch cadence. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker uses social engineering to induce a victim running Chrome Remote Desktop (Chromoting) on Windows to interact with an attacker-influenced session, then sends crafted network traffic that causes Chrome to render spoofed or misleading UI elements. The victim, trusting the falsified interface, is deceived into taking an action (e.g., approving a connection or trusting displayed information). No public exploit code was provided, and success depends entirely on the victim's interaction. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 06, 2026
UI misrepresentation in the Chromoting (Chrome Remote Desktop) component of Google Chrome on Windows allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to spoof interface elements by delivering crafted network traffic, provided the victim is socially engineered into interacting with the session. Only Windows installations of Chrome prior to 155.0.8059.39 are affected, and the outcome is limited to misleading the user (low confidentiality impact) rather than code execution or credential compromise. No public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation was identified at time of analysis, and the Chromium team rated the security severity as Low.
RemediationAI
Upgrade Google Chrome on Windows to 155.0.8059.39 or later via the browser's built-in update mechanism or the stable channel release referenced at https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/10/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_086471744.html; vendor-released patch version 155.0.8059.39 addresses the issue, and details are tracked at https://issues.chromium.org/issues/556259957. Where immediate upgrading is not possible, reduce the exposure surface by disabling or uninstalling the Chromoting host component and the Chrome Remote Desktop extension on managed Windows endpoints (side effect: remote support and remote-desktop workflows become unavailable, so a sanctioned alternative such as the enterprise remote access tool must be designated), and restrict outbound/inbound remoting traffic to approved relay and host endpoints via firewall or proxy policy (side effect: legitimate off-network remote sessions may break and require allowlisting). Because exploitation depends on social engineering plus user interaction (UI:R), reinforce user awareness training against unsolicited remote-session invitations and unexpected remote-desktop prompts, and consider enterprise policy to require explicit user confirmation before accepting remoting connections; note that these are compensating controls only and do not remove the underlying UI spoofing defect.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is a CWE-451 user interface misrepresentation issue inside Chromoting, the remoting protocol and host/client implementation that underpins Chrome Remote Desktop. Because Chromoting renders remote desktop content and session chrome within the browser, crafted network traffic on the remoting channel can cause the UI to present information that does not correspond to the real session state, enabling spoofing of interface elements. The affected product is captured by the generic CPE cpe:2.3:a:google:chrome:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, but the vendor advisory and EUVD data scope the defect specifically to the Chromoting feature on Windows prior to 155.0.8059.39. The CVSS vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L (as published) reflects a network-reachable, unauthenticated attack that nevertheless requires victim interaction; our independent assessment narrows the impact further and drops the availability component, leaving CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N. Root cause is a failure to faithfully represent session/UI state, not a memory-safety or privilege boundary defect.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
Network-reachable crafted traffic (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N) but mandatory victim interaction (UI:R); impact is limited deception/disclosure (C:L), with no integrity or availability effect justified for a pure UI-spoofing flaw.
Primary rating from Vendor (Chrome).
CVSS VectorVendor: Chrome
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
UI misrepresentation in Chromoting in Google Chrome on on Windows prior to 155.0.8059.39 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to potentially spoof UI elements via crafted network traffic. (Chromium security severity: Low)
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
Command injection in the Windows Shell lets remote, unauthenticated attackers bypass a Windows security feature and then
External control of file name or path in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network
EUVD-2026-93652
GHSA-333x-v5m7-6vff
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB